agentleFS
wonderslifewonderslife/pdd-skills/expert-auto-refactor/SKILL.md

expert-auto-refactor

Skill41 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Automated refactoring expert skill that transforms collected quality improvement tasks into concrete code operations. Automatically triggers when users need code refactoring, duplicate elimination, or complexity simplification.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Small steps: Only change a small part each time

    line 192
  2. Distinctive:

    Maintain tests: Ensure tests always pass

    line 193
  3. Distinctive:

    Frequent commits: Commit after each small step

    line 194
  4. Distinctive:

    Rollback capable: Keep each commit independently rollbackable

    line 195

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Automated Refactoring Expert (expert-auto-refactor)

Core Philosophy

"Initiate targeted refactoring PRs regularly in a 'small debt repayment' manner to prevent technical debt from accumulating into unmanageable 'painful interest'." —— Harness Engineering

The automated refactoring expert is an upgraded version of expert-code-quality, not just recording issues but actively executing refactoring operations.

Refactoring Types

1. Extract Common Methods

Scenario: Similar code logic in multiple places

Refactoring Method:

  1. Identify similar code
  2. Extract common methods
  3. Replace original calls

Example:

Before refactoring:

// File A
function formatDate(date) {
  return `${date.getFullYear()}-${date.getMonth() + 1}-${date.getDate()}`;
}

// File B
function formatDateString(d) {
  return `${d.getFullYear()}-${d.getMonth() + 1}-${d.getDate()}`;
}

After refactoring:

// utils/dateUtils.ts
export function formatDate(date: Date): string {
  return `${date.getFullYear()}-${date.getMonth() + 1}-${date.getDate()}`;
}

// File A
import { formatDate } from '../utils/dateUtils';

// File B
import { formatDate } from '../utils/dateUtils';

2. Eliminate Duplicate Code

Scenario: Identical or highly similar code blocks

Refactoring Method:

  1. Detect duplicate code
  2. Extract to shared module
  3. Update references

Example:

Before refactoring:

// Repeated validation logic in multiple places
if (!user.email || !user.email.includes('@')) {
  throw new Error('Invalid email');
}

After refactoring:

// utils/validators.ts
export function validateEmail(email: string): boolean {
  return email && email.includes('@');
}

// Usage
if (!validateEmail(user.email)) {
  throw new Error('Invalid email');
}

3. Simplify Complex Logic

Scenario: Functions that are too long, deeply nested, or have complex logic

Refactoring Method:

  1. Split long functions
  2. Extract sub-functions
  3. Simplify conditional logic

Example:

Before refactoring:

function processOrder(order) {
  if (order.status === 'pending') {
    if (order.items.length > 0) {
      if (order.payment) {
        // Processing logic...
        if (order.shipping) {
          // More processing...
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

After refactoring:

function processOrder(order) {
  if (!canProcessOrder(order)) return;
  
  processPayment(order);
  processShipping(order);
  updateOrderStatus(order);
}

function canProcessOrder(order) {
  return order.status === 'pending' 
    && order.items.length > 0 
    && order.payment;
}

4. Optimize Naming

Scenario: Non-standard naming, unclear meaning

Refactoring Method:

  1. Analyze naming context
  2. Generate better naming
  3. Batch replacement

Example:

Before refactoring:

function calc(a, b) {
  return a * b * 0.1;
}

After refactoring:

function calculateTax(basePrice: number, quantity: number): number {
  const TAX_RATE = 0.1;
  return basePrice * quantity * TAX_RATE;
}

Refactoring Process

┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
│   Analyze   │ ──→ │    Plan     │ ──→ │   Execute   │ ──→ │   Verify    │
│             │     │             │     │             │     │             │
│ • Code      │     │ • Refactor  │     │ • Code      │     │ • Test      │
│   structure │     │   strategy  │     │   changes   │     │   execution │
│ •           │     │ • Impact    │     │ • Reference │     │ • Function  │
│ Dependencies│     │   scope     │     │   updates   │     │   validation│
│ • Test      │     │ • Risk      │     │ • Document  │     │ • PR        │
│   coverage  │     │   assessment│     │   sync      │     │   creation  │
└─────────────┘     └─────────────┘     └─────────────┘     └─────────────┘

Refactoring Strategy

Small Debt Repayment Principle

Each refactoring should:

  1. Small steps: Only change a small part each time
  2. Maintain tests: Ensure tests always pass
  3. Frequent commits: Commit after each small step
  4. Rollback capable: Keep each commit independently rollbackable

Risk Assessment

Risk LevelConditionStrategy
LowComplete test coverageAuto execute
MediumPartial test coverageCreate PR
HighNo test coverageAdd tests first then refactor

Output Format

Refactoring Report

# Refactoring Report - YYYY-MM-DD

## Refactoring Scope
- Target files: X
- Affected files: X
- Test coverage: X%

## Refactoring Operations

### Extract Common Methods
| Original File | New File | Method Name | Status |
|-------|-------|-------|------|
| utils/formatDate.js | utils/dateUtils.ts | formatDate | ✅ Completed |

### Eliminate Duplicate Code
| File A | File B | Duplicate Lines | Status |
|-------|-------|---------|------|
| service/UserService.ts | service/OrderService.ts | 25 lines | ✅ Completed |

### Simplify Complex Logic
| File | Function Name | Original Lines | New Lines | Status |
|------|-------|-------|-------|------|
| service/OrderService.ts | processOrder | 80 | 35 | ✅ Completed |

## Verification Results
- Unit tests: ✅ All passed
- Integration tests: ✅ All passed
- Functional verification: ✅ No anomalies

## PR Information
- PR number: #XXX
- Branch: refactor/entropy-reduction-YYYYMMDD
- Status: Pending review

Configuration Options

# auto-refactor-config.yaml
auto_refactor:
  # Refactoring scope
  scope:
    code_paths: ["src/"]
    exclude: ["node_modules/", "dist/", "build/"]
  
  # Refactoring rules
  rules:
    max_file_lines: 300
    max_function_lines: 50
    min_similarity: 0.8
  
  # Execution strategy
  execution:
    auto_fix_low_risk: true   # Auto fix low risk
    create_pr: true           # Create PR
    max_changes_per_run: 10   # Max changes per run
  
  # Testing requirements
  testing:
    require_tests: true       # Require tests
    min_coverage: 80          # Minimum coverage

Usage Examples

Example 1: Extract Duplicate Code

User: Eliminate duplicates in code

AI:
1. Detect duplicate code
2. Analyze similarity
3. Extract to shared module
4. Update all references
5. Create PR

Example 2: Simplify Complex Function

User: Simplify processOrder function

AI:
1. Analyze function structure
2. Identify extractable sub-functions
3. Execute split refactoring
4. Run test verification
5. Create PR

Example 3: Optimize Naming

User: Optimize code naming

AI:
1. Scan non-standard naming
2. Analyze context
3. Generate better naming
4. Batch replacement
5. Create PR

Collaboration with Other Skills

  • pdd-entropy-reduction: Called as a sub-skill by the coordinator
  • expert-entropy-auditor: Receive refactoring suggestions
  • expert-arch-enforcer: Receive architecture violation fixes
  • pdd-code-reviewer: Trigger code review after refactoring
  • pdd-doc-change: Synchronously update related documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.