strategy-create
Skill6 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Bootstrap strategy docs from a project definition. Use after /define produces a project definition. Use as Stage 0 step 3 before /roadmap-create. Configurable doc set; counterpart to /strategy-sync which updates existing docs.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstorm-reviewSkill
- brainstormSkill
- conceptSkill
- defineSkill
- financial-reviewSkill
- light-spec-reviseSkill
- light-specSkill
- linear-hygieneSkill
- linearSkill
- phase-planSkill
- pipekit-helpSkill
- pipekit-updateSkill
- pk-bugSkill
- pk-exitSkill
- pk-expressSkill
- pr-fixSkill
- prod-readySkill
- pr-security-reviewSkill
- release-changelogSkill
- repo-security-reviewSkill
- review-planSkill
- roadmap-createSkill
- roadmap-reviewSkill
- security-gateSkill
- spec-preflightSkill
- startupSkill
- strategy-syncSkill
- sync-linearSkill
- tpmSkill
- verifySkill
- workSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
If it doesn't exist, warn: _"No project definition found.
- Very specific: line 34
Read method.config.md if it exists (may already have a Strategy Docs table)
- Very specific: line 78
Read the template from templates/strategy/
- Very specific: line 79
Read project-definition.md for source material
- Distinctive: line 93
Wait for feedback. If the user requests changes, read the file, apply edits, write it back, and point them to it again.
- Very specific: line 106
Create the Strategy/ directory if it doesn't exist
- Very specific: line 107
Write each approved doc to Strategy/
- Distinctive: line 108
Use consistent filenames matching the method config format:
- Very specific: line 119
Read method.config.md (create from template if it doesn't exist)
- Very specific: line 120
Update the ## Strategy Docs table with the docs just created:
- Distinctive: line 164
Write first, review in editor: Write each doc to disk immediately, point the user to the file, and give a brief terminal summary.
- Distinctive: line 168
When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Strategy Create Skill
You are a strategy document generator. Your job is to create initial strategy docs from a project definition. Read method.config.md for project context. This is the creation counterpart to /strategy-sync (which updates existing docs after features ship).
Triggers
/strategy-create- "create strategy docs"
- "bootstrap strategy docs"
Prerequisites
project-definition.mdshould exist (output of/define)- If it doesn't exist, warn: "No project definition found. Run
/definefirst."
Purpose
Strategy docs are the human-readable explanation of the product. They serve two audiences:
- Stakeholders — understand what the product does in plain language
- Developers — understand the technical model, permissions, and patterns
These docs are living documents: /strategy-create generates v0.1.0, /strategy-sync updates them after features ship. Code is always truth — docs track reality.
Execution Steps
Phase 1 — Determine Doc Set
- Read
project-definition.md - Read
method.config.mdif it exists (may already have a Strategy Docs table) - Analyze the project definition to recommend which docs are needed:
Always create:
| Doc | Template | When |
| Conceptual Overview | templates/strategy/conceptual-overview.md | Always |
| Technical Architecture | templates/strategy/technical-architecture.md | Always |
Create if applicable:
| Doc | Template | Trigger |
| Design Direction | templates/strategy/design-direction.md | Project has a UI (web, mobile, desktop) |
| Permissions | templates/strategy/permissions.md | Project has user roles with different access levels |
| Data Model | templates/strategy/data-model.md | Project has complex data relationships or calculations |
| Workflow Examples | templates/strategy/workflow-examples.md | Project has multi-step user journeys |
| UX Reference | templates/strategy/ux-reference.md | Project has complex UI interactions |
- Present the recommended doc set:
## Recommended Strategy Docs for {Project Name}
Required:
1. Conceptual Overview — what it does (stakeholders)
2. Technical Architecture — how it works (developers)
Recommended based on your project:
3. Permissions — you defined {N} user roles with different access
4. Data Model — your workflows involve {entities}
Optional:
5. Workflow Examples — would help document {N} key workflows
6. UX Reference — skip for now, add when UI patterns emerge
Create all recommended? Or adjust the list?- User approves or adjusts the doc set.
Phase 2 — Generate Each Doc
For each approved doc, in order:
- Read the template from
templates/strategy/ - Read
project-definition.mdfor source material - Generate a first draft:
- Fill in project-specific content from the definition
- Match the audience level specified in the template header
- Mark sections as
[TBD]where the definition doesn't provide enough detail - Set version to
v0.1.0and date to today
- Write the file to
Strategy/immediately — don't dump the full document in the terminal - Tell the user where to find it and give a brief summary:
"Written to Strategy/{DocName}.md. Here's what it covers:"
- {3-5 bullet summary of the document's key content}
"Open it in your editor, review it, and let me know what to change — or say 'approved' to move to the next doc."
- Wait for feedback. If the user requests changes, read the file, apply edits, write it back, and point them to it again. Iterate until approved.
Audience discipline:
- Conceptual Overview: Simple language. A stakeholder with no technical background should understand it completely. No code, no jargon.
- Technical Architecture: Developer-level. Schema detail, API patterns, code conventions.
- Design Direction: Practical. Developers and AI agents need clear aesthetic guidance. Ask for inspiration links, color preferences, typography direction, and anti-patterns. Explicitly probe for the build model's default aesthetic tendencies — recent Claude models settle into a persistent house style (cream backgrounds, serif displays like Georgia/Fraunces/Playfair, terracotta accents, Space Grotesk, purple gradients, generic sans stacks). If the user's aesthetic doesn't counter these with a concrete alternative, the build agents will default to them — generic "make it clean" instructions just shift the model to a different fixed palette. This doc is read by
/frontend-designduring execution. - Permissions: Technical but clear. Admins need to understand the access model.
- Data Model: Developer-level. Entity relationships, constraints, calculations.
- Workflow Examples: Step-by-step, concrete. All audiences.
- UX Reference: Practical. Developers and support need to understand UI patterns.
Phase 3 — Write Files
- Create the
Strategy/directory if it doesn't exist - Write each approved doc to
Strategy/ - Use consistent filenames matching the method config format:
Strategy/ConceptualOverview.mdStrategy/TechnicalArchitecture.mdStrategy/DesignDirection.mdStrategy/Permissions.mdStrategy/DataModel.mdStrategy/WorkflowExamples.mdStrategy/UXReference.md
Phase 4 — Update Config
- Read
method.config.md(create from template if it doesn't exist) - Update the
## Strategy Docstable with the docs just created:
## Strategy Docs
| Doc | File | Purpose | Audience |
|-----|------|---------|----------|
| Conceptual Overview | `Strategy/ConceptualOverview.md` | What the product does | Stakeholders |
| Technical Architecture | `Strategy/TechnicalArchitecture.md` | System design, APIs, patterns | Developers |
| Permissions | `Strategy/Permissions.md` | Auth, roles, access control | Developers, Admins |- This table is read by
/strategy-syncto know which docs to update after features ship.
Phase 5 — Summary
## Strategy Docs Created
Directory: Strategy/
Docs created: {N}
- ConceptualOverview.md (v0.1.0)
- TechnicalArchitecture.md (v0.1.0)
- Permissions.md (v0.1.0)
- ...
Config updated: method.config.md — Strategy Docs table
TBD sections: {N} items across {M} docs need detail as the project develops
- TechnicalArchitecture.md §Data Model: schema not yet defined
- ...
Next steps:
- Tech stack decisions (if not yet made): /startup
- /roadmap-create — turn project stages into a structured roadmap
- Strategy docs will be updated automatically via /strategy-sync after features shipRules
- v0.1.0 is intentionally incomplete. Strategy docs grow with the project. It's fine to have
[TBD]sections — they'll be filled as features are built and/strategy-syncruns. - Don't invent features. Strategy docs describe what's in the project definition, not new ideas. If a doc feels thin, that's OK — it'll grow.
- Match audience. Conceptual Overview reads like a product pitch. Technical Architecture reads like system design docs. Don't mix the registers.
- Config is the manifest. The
method.config.mdStrategy Docs table is the source of truth for which docs exist. Both/strategy-createand/strategy-syncread it. - Write first, review in editor. Write each doc to disk immediately, point the user to the file, and give a brief terminal summary. Don't dump full documents in the terminal — the user reviews in their editor.
Common Drifts to Avoid
When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:
- Reducing the doc set → Every project needs at minimum Conceptual Overview + Technical Architecture. Other docs are optional, but these two anchor everything.
- Entire sections as
[TBD]→ Individual[TBD]items are fine. But if an entire section is[TBD], the project definition likely wasn't detailed enough — go back to/define. - Mixing audience registers → Read the template header for each doc. Conceptual Overview uses no jargon; Technical Architecture includes schema detail. Keep the registers separate.
- Padding thin docs → v0.1.0 is supposed to be thin. It grows as features ship and
/strategy-syncruns. Inventing features to fill pages creates inaccurate docs.
Related
/define— previous step: creates the project definition that feeds this skill/strategy-sync— counterpart: updates these docs after features ship/roadmap-create— next step: uses strategy docs to build the roadmaptemplates/strategy/— templates for each doc type
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

