brainstorm-review
Skill6 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Batch-triage untriaged Linear issues — Now/Later/Kill verdict per item. Use when the brainstorm backlog has stacked up. Use before /phase-plan to clean the candidate pool. EXPAND/HOLD/REDUCE framework with scope reduction on Now items.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormSkill
- conceptSkill
- defineSkill
- financial-reviewSkill
- light-spec-reviseSkill
- light-specSkill
- linear-hygieneSkill
- linearSkill
- phase-planSkill
- pipekit-helpSkill
- pipekit-updateSkill
- pk-bugSkill
- pk-exitSkill
- pk-expressSkill
- pr-fixSkill
- prod-readySkill
- pr-security-reviewSkill
- release-changelogSkill
- repo-security-reviewSkill
- review-planSkill
- roadmap-createSkill
- roadmap-reviewSkill
- security-gateSkill
- spec-preflightSkill
- startupSkill
- strategy-createSkill
- strategy-syncSkill
- sync-linearSkill
- tpmSkill
- verifySkill
- workSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
Read method.config.md for team and state IDs
- Very specific: line 34
Follow endCursor while hasNextPage is true
- Distinctive: line 85
Ask which phase/stage
- Distinctive: line 86
If the brainstorm is broad, run REDUCE: _"What's the smallest useful version?
- Very specific: line 87
Update description with ## v1 Scope if reduced — pk issue update <ID> --description-file <F> (the write replaces the whole description, so …
- Very specific: line 96
Ask for trigger type from the grammar (same table as /brainstorm Phase 2 HOLD — see that skill for the full list).
- Distinctive: line 97
Ask for target initiative/stage
- Very specific: line 99
Add Parked label — pk issue update <ID> --add-label Parked (same call as the state move).
- Distinctive: line 104
Do not paraphrase. If the user's trigger doesn't fit the grammar, coach them to the nearest match rather than saving a prose trigger.
- Distinctive: line 112
Ask which issue to merge into
- Distinctive: line 157
When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorm Review Skill
You are a brainstorm triage coordinator. Your job is to batch-triage untriaged Linear issues. Read method.config.md for project context. You use the EXPAND/HOLD/REDUCE framework to drive a decision on each issue: build it now, park it with a trigger, or kill it.
Triggers
/brainstorm-review- "review brainstorms"
- "triage issues"
- "process brainstorms"
Purpose
Issues created by /brainstorm land in Triage or Ideas with no disposition. They accumulate, create noise, and get forgotten. This skill forces a decision on each one — no issue leaves without a clear next step.
Run from the parent project root, not from inside a pk branch worktree.
Execution Steps
Phase 1 — Fetch Undisposed Issues
- Read
method.config.mdfor team and state IDs - Fetch issues needing disposition via the project's Linear route (verb table:
sop/Linear_SOP.md § Linear transport; themcproute's equivalent of each call is listed there). It is a state sweep, not a title search, so it is apk gqlpage — and run the whole review's Linear traffic in one subagent, serially (sop/Linear_SOP.md § Rate limits):pk gql 'query($team: String!, $after: String) { issues(first:50, after:$after, filter:{ team:{ name:{ eq:$team } }, state:{ name:{ in:["Triage","Ideas"] } } }) { nodes { identifier title createdAt priority project { name } labels { nodes { name } } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } }' '{"team":"{team from method.config.md}","after":null}'- State: Triage or Ideas (the
state.name infilter above) - Filter out issues that already have a
Parkedlabel (already dispositioned as "Later") — drop any node whoselabelsincludeParked - Follow
endCursorwhilehasNextPageis true
- State: Triage or Ideas (the
- Sort by creation date (oldest first)
Phase 2 — Present Dashboard
## Brainstorm Review — {N} issues need disposition
| # | Issue | Title | Created | Complexity |
|---|-------|-------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | PROJ-12 | Advanced search filters | 3 days ago | Medium |
| 2 | PROJ-15 | Export to PDF | 1 week ago | Low |
| 3 | PROJ-18 | AI-powered search matching | 2 weeks ago | High |
| ...
Review each? Or filter by project/age?Phase 3 — Disposition Each Issue
For each issue, present the analysis and force a decision:
- Read the issue —
pk issue show <ID> --commentsfor the description and thread, plus its relations (dependencies, duplicates —pk issue showcarries none) viapk gql '{ issue(id:"<ID>") { relations(first:50) { nodes { type relatedIssue { identifier state { name } } } } inverseRelations(first:50) { nodes { type issue { identifier state { name } } } } } }' - Assess against current project state:
- Does it align with the current stage?
- Are its dependencies met or close to met?
- Is it duplicated by another issue?
- Has the need changed since it was brainstormed?
- Present disposition options:
## PROJ-12 — Advanced Search Filters
Brainstormed: 3 days ago
Complexity: Medium (~6-10h)
Dependencies: PROJ-3 (Basic search) — currently in Building
Assessment: Aligns with Stage 1. Dependency will be met this initiative.
Recommendation: Now — queue for next initiative after PROJ-3 ships.
Disposition:
1. Now → route to pipeline (assign phase, move to Needs Spec)
2. Later → park with trigger condition
3. Kill → archive with rationale
4. Merge → combine with existing issue
5. Skip → come back to this one laterPhase 4 — Execute Disposition
Now:
- Ask which phase/stage
- If the brainstorm is broad, run REDUCE: "What's the smallest useful version? What can wait?"
- Update description with
## v1 Scopeif reduced —pk issue update <ID> --description-file <F>(the write replaces the whole description, so send existing + new section) - Route by complexity tier (matches
/brainstormtier mapping):- Low → Quick: move to "Approved" (
pk issue update <ID> --state Approved) — ready forpk branch {issue}+/work {issue}(no spec) - Medium → Standard: move to "Needs Spec" (
pk issue update <ID> --state "Needs Spec") — ready for/light-spec {issue} - High → Heavy: move to "Needs Spec" (same call) —
/light-specmandatory;/workthen plans inline with forced--deepgrounding on the native backend (the default)
- Low → Quick: move to "Approved" (
- Set priority (ask user) —
pk issue set <ID> --priority N - Assign to correct project/initiative —
pk issue update <ID> --project <I{N}.P{N}>
Later:
- Ask for trigger type from the grammar (same table as
/brainstormPhase 2 HOLD — see that skill for the full list). In short:{ISSUE-ID} ships|Stage {N} UAT passes|Initiative {N} ships|date: YYYY-MM-DD|manual - Ask for target initiative/stage
- Move to "Ideas" or "Future Phases" —
pk issue update <ID> --state Ideas/--state "Future Phases" - Add
Parkedlabel —pk issue update <ID> --add-label Parked(same call as the state move). Create it if missing, color#EAB308:pk gql 'mutation($in: IssueLabelCreateInput!) { issueLabelCreate(input:$in) { success issueLabel { id name } } }' '{"in":{"teamId":"<TEAM>","name":"Parked","color":"#EAB308"}}'(team id frompk config "Team ID") - Post the Linear comment —
pk issue comment <ID> "<body>"— in the exact parseable format —/roadmap-reviewgreps for this prefix:
Do not paraphrase. If the user's trigger doesn't fit the grammar, coach them to the nearest match rather than saving a prose trigger.**Parked:** Revisit when {trigger}. Target: {phase/stage}.
Kill:
- Ask for rationale
- Move to "Canceled" —
pk issue update <ID> --state Canceled - Post Linear comment —
pk issue comment <ID> "Killed: {rationale}"
Merge:
- Ask which issue to merge into
- Post the brainstorm content as a comment on the target issue —
pk issue comment <TARGET-ID> --body-file <F> - Move this issue to "Duplicate" —
pk issue update <ID> --state Duplicate - Set
duplicate ofrelation —pk issue relatewrites onlyblocks, so:pk gql 'mutation { issueRelationCreate(input:{ issueId:"<ID>", relatedIssueId:"<TARGET-ID>", type: duplicate }) { success } }'
Phase 5 — Summary
## Brainstorm Review Complete
Reviewed: {N} issues
Now: {N} (moved to On Deck / Needs Spec)
- PROJ-12 — Advanced search filters → Phase 2
- PROJ-15 — Export to PDF → Phase 3
Later: {N} (parked with triggers)
- PROJ-18 — AI matching → revisit after Stage 1 UAT
Killed: {N}
- PROJ-20 — Real-time collaboration → out of scope for this product
Merged: {N}
- PROJ-22 → merged into PROJ-12
Skipped: {N}
Next steps:
- /phase-plan --rebalance if "Now" items should enter the current initiative
- /light-spec {issue} for any "Now" items in Needs Spec (Standard/Heavy)
- pk branch {issue} + /work {issue} for any "Now" items in Approved (Quick)
- /roadmap-review to validate the updated boardIntegration with Other Skills
| Skill | How It Connects |
/brainstorm | Creates the issues this skill triages. /brainstorm now includes immediate disposition (Phase 2), but older issues or batch-created issues still need /brainstorm-review. |
/roadmap-review | Surfaces "Later" items whose trigger conditions have fired. When a parked issue's trigger is met, /roadmap-review flags it for re-disposition. |
/phase-plan | "Now" dispositions feed into phase composition. Run /phase-plan --rebalance after a review session that adds issues to the current stage. |
/light-spec | The next step for "Now" items that move to Needs Spec. |
Common Drifts to Avoid
When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:
- Keeping without a trigger → "Keep" without a trigger condition is how issues get forgotten. Choose Later (with a concrete trigger) or Kill.
- Vague triggers → "Someday" is not a trigger condition. Define a concrete revisit point (e.g., "after PROJ-56 ships", "after Stage 1 UAT").
- Priority without a home → Setting priority without an initiative/stage assignment is incomplete. Every disposition should answer: where does it ship?
Related
/brainstorm— creates issues with immediate disposition/concept— project-level ideation (different from feature brainstorming)/phase-plan— manages phase composition after disposition/roadmap-review— surfaces parked items whose triggers have fired
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

