agentleFS
withpiperwithpiper/pipekit/skills/brainstorm-review/SKILL.md

brainstorm-review

Skill6 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Batch-triage untriaged Linear issues — Now/Later/Kill verdict per item. Use when the brainstorm backlog has stacked up. Use before /phase-plan to clean the candidate pool. EXPAND/HOLD/REDUCE framework with scope reduction on Now items.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read method.config.md for team and state IDs

    line 27
  2. Very specific:

    Follow endCursor while hasNextPage is true

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask which phase/stage

    line 85
  4. Distinctive:

    If the brainstorm is broad, run REDUCE: _"What's the smallest useful version?

    line 86
  5. Very specific:

    Update description with ## v1 Scope if reduced — pk issue update <ID> --description-file <F> (the write replaces the whole description, so …

    line 87
  6. Very specific:

    Ask for trigger type from the grammar (same table as /brainstorm Phase 2 HOLD — see that skill for the full list).

    line 96
  7. Distinctive:

    Ask for target initiative/stage

    line 97
  8. Very specific:

    Add Parked label — pk issue update <ID> --add-label Parked (same call as the state move).

    line 99
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not paraphrase. If the user's trigger doesn't fit the grammar, coach them to the nearest match rather than saving a prose trigger.

    line 104
  10. Distinctive:

    Ask which issue to merge into

    line 112
  11. Distinctive:

    When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:

    line 157

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brainstorm Review Skill

You are a brainstorm triage coordinator. Your job is to batch-triage untriaged Linear issues. Read method.config.md for project context. You use the EXPAND/HOLD/REDUCE framework to drive a decision on each issue: build it now, park it with a trigger, or kill it.

Triggers

  • /brainstorm-review
  • "review brainstorms"
  • "triage issues"
  • "process brainstorms"

Purpose

Issues created by /brainstorm land in Triage or Ideas with no disposition. They accumulate, create noise, and get forgotten. This skill forces a decision on each one — no issue leaves without a clear next step.

Run from the parent project root, not from inside a pk branch worktree.

Execution Steps

Phase 1 — Fetch Undisposed Issues

  1. Read method.config.md for team and state IDs
  2. Fetch issues needing disposition via the project's Linear route (verb table: sop/Linear_SOP.md § Linear transport; the mcp route's equivalent of each call is listed there). It is a state sweep, not a title search, so it is a pk gql page — and run the whole review's Linear traffic in one subagent, serially (sop/Linear_SOP.md § Rate limits):
    pk gql 'query($team: String!, $after: String) { issues(first:50, after:$after, filter:{ team:{ name:{ eq:$team } }, state:{ name:{ in:["Triage","Ideas"] } } }) { nodes { identifier title createdAt priority project { name } labels { nodes { name } } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } }' '{"team":"{team from method.config.md}","after":null}'
    • State: Triage or Ideas (the state.name in filter above)
    • Filter out issues that already have a Parked label (already dispositioned as "Later") — drop any node whose labels include Parked
    • Follow endCursor while hasNextPage is true
  3. Sort by creation date (oldest first)

Phase 2 — Present Dashboard

## Brainstorm Review — {N} issues need disposition

| # | Issue | Title | Created | Complexity |
|---|-------|-------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | PROJ-12 | Advanced search filters | 3 days ago | Medium |
| 2 | PROJ-15 | Export to PDF | 1 week ago | Low |
| 3 | PROJ-18 | AI-powered search matching | 2 weeks ago | High |
| ...

Review each? Or filter by project/age?

Phase 3 — Disposition Each Issue

For each issue, present the analysis and force a decision:

  1. Read the issue — pk issue show <ID> --comments for the description and thread, plus its relations (dependencies, duplicates — pk issue show carries none) via pk gql '{ issue(id:"<ID>") { relations(first:50) { nodes { type relatedIssue { identifier state { name } } } } inverseRelations(first:50) { nodes { type issue { identifier state { name } } } } } }'
  2. Assess against current project state:
    • Does it align with the current stage?
    • Are its dependencies met or close to met?
    • Is it duplicated by another issue?
    • Has the need changed since it was brainstormed?
  3. Present disposition options:
## PROJ-12 — Advanced Search Filters

Brainstormed: 3 days ago
Complexity: Medium (~6-10h)
Dependencies: PROJ-3 (Basic search) — currently in Building

Assessment: Aligns with Stage 1. Dependency will be met this initiative.
Recommendation: Now — queue for next initiative after PROJ-3 ships.

Disposition:
  1. Now → route to pipeline (assign phase, move to Needs Spec)
  2. Later → park with trigger condition
  3. Kill → archive with rationale
  4. Merge → combine with existing issue
  5. Skip → come back to this one later

Phase 4 — Execute Disposition

Now:

  1. Ask which phase/stage
  2. If the brainstorm is broad, run REDUCE: "What's the smallest useful version? What can wait?"
  3. Update description with ## v1 Scope if reduced — pk issue update <ID> --description-file <F> (the write replaces the whole description, so send existing + new section)
  4. Route by complexity tier (matches /brainstorm tier mapping):
    • Low → Quick: move to "Approved" (pk issue update <ID> --state Approved) — ready for pk branch {issue} + /work {issue} (no spec)
    • Medium → Standard: move to "Needs Spec" (pk issue update <ID> --state "Needs Spec") — ready for /light-spec {issue}
    • High → Heavy: move to "Needs Spec" (same call) — /light-spec mandatory; /work then plans inline with forced --deep grounding on the native backend (the default)
  5. Set priority (ask user) — pk issue set <ID> --priority N
  6. Assign to correct project/initiative — pk issue update <ID> --project <I{N}.P{N}>

Later:

  1. Ask for trigger type from the grammar (same table as /brainstorm Phase 2 HOLD — see that skill for the full list). In short: {ISSUE-ID} ships | Stage {N} UAT passes | Initiative {N} ships | date: YYYY-MM-DD | manual
  2. Ask for target initiative/stage
  3. Move to "Ideas" or "Future Phases" — pk issue update <ID> --state Ideas / --state "Future Phases"
  4. Add Parked label — pk issue update <ID> --add-label Parked (same call as the state move). Create it if missing, color #EAB308: pk gql 'mutation($in: IssueLabelCreateInput!) { issueLabelCreate(input:$in) { success issueLabel { id name } } }' '{"in":{"teamId":"<TEAM>","name":"Parked","color":"#EAB308"}}' (team id from pk config "Team ID")
  5. Post the Linear comment — pk issue comment <ID> "<body>" — in the exact parseable format — /roadmap-review greps for this prefix:
    **Parked:** Revisit when {trigger}. Target: {phase/stage}.
    Do not paraphrase. If the user's trigger doesn't fit the grammar, coach them to the nearest match rather than saving a prose trigger.

Kill:

  1. Ask for rationale
  2. Move to "Canceled" — pk issue update <ID> --state Canceled
  3. Post Linear comment — pk issue comment <ID> "Killed: {rationale}"

Merge:

  1. Ask which issue to merge into
  2. Post the brainstorm content as a comment on the target issue — pk issue comment <TARGET-ID> --body-file <F>
  3. Move this issue to "Duplicate" — pk issue update <ID> --state Duplicate
  4. Set duplicate of relation — pk issue relate writes only blocks, so: pk gql 'mutation { issueRelationCreate(input:{ issueId:"<ID>", relatedIssueId:"<TARGET-ID>", type: duplicate }) { success } }'

Phase 5 — Summary

## Brainstorm Review Complete

Reviewed: {N} issues

  Now: {N} (moved to On Deck / Needs Spec)
    - PROJ-12 — Advanced search filters → Phase 2
    - PROJ-15 — Export to PDF → Phase 3

  Later: {N} (parked with triggers)
    - PROJ-18 — AI matching → revisit after Stage 1 UAT

  Killed: {N}
    - PROJ-20 — Real-time collaboration → out of scope for this product

  Merged: {N}
    - PROJ-22 → merged into PROJ-12

  Skipped: {N}

Next steps:
  - /phase-plan --rebalance if "Now" items should enter the current initiative
  - /light-spec {issue} for any "Now" items in Needs Spec (Standard/Heavy)
  - pk branch {issue} + /work {issue} for any "Now" items in Approved (Quick)
  - /roadmap-review to validate the updated board

Integration with Other Skills

SkillHow It Connects
/brainstormCreates the issues this skill triages. /brainstorm now includes immediate disposition (Phase 2), but older issues or batch-created issues still need /brainstorm-review.
/roadmap-reviewSurfaces "Later" items whose trigger conditions have fired. When a parked issue's trigger is met, /roadmap-review flags it for re-disposition.
/phase-plan"Now" dispositions feed into phase composition. Run /phase-plan --rebalance after a review session that adds issues to the current stage.
/light-specThe next step for "Now" items that move to Needs Spec.

Common Drifts to Avoid

When you encounter these situations, take the safer path:

  • Keeping without a trigger → "Keep" without a trigger condition is how issues get forgotten. Choose Later (with a concrete trigger) or Kill.
  • Vague triggers → "Someday" is not a trigger condition. Define a concrete revisit point (e.g., "after PROJ-56 ships", "after Stage 1 UAT").
  • Priority without a home → Setting priority without an initiative/stage assignment is incomplete. Every disposition should answer: where does it ship?

Related

  • /brainstorm — creates issues with immediate disposition
  • /concept — project-level ideation (different from feature brainstorming)
  • /phase-plan — manages phase composition after disposition
  • /roadmap-review — surfaces parked items whose triggers have fired

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.