agentleFS
weininghuiweininghui/skills/afrexai-compliance-audit/SKILL.md

afrexai-compliance-audit

Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run internal compliance audits against major frameworks without hiring a consultant.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run internal compliance audits against major frameworks without hiring a consultant.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Document inventory needed for audit

    line 61
  3. Distinctive:

    When the user requests a compliance audit:

    line 67
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask which framework(s) they need assessed

    line 69

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Compliance Audit Generator

Run internal compliance audits against major frameworks without hiring a consultant.

What It Does

Generates a structured compliance audit for your organization against any of these frameworks:

  • SOC 2 (Type I & II) — Trust Services Criteria
  • ISO 27001 — Information Security Management
  • GDPR — Data Protection (EU/UK)
  • HIPAA — Healthcare Data (US)
  • PCI DSS — Payment Card Security
  • SOX — Financial Controls (US public companies)
  • CCPA/CPRA — California Consumer Privacy

How to Use

Tell the agent which framework you need audited. Provide context about your organization:

  • Industry and size
  • Current security controls
  • Data types you handle
  • Existing certifications
  • Known gaps or concerns

Example Prompts

  • "Run a SOC 2 readiness audit for our 40-person SaaS company"
  • "Check our GDPR compliance — we process EU customer data and use AWS"
  • "Generate an ISO 27001 gap analysis for our fintech startup"
  • "Audit our HIPAA controls — we're a healthtech handling PHI"

Output Format

The agent produces:

1. Executive Summary

  • Overall readiness score (0-100%)
  • Critical gaps count
  • Estimated remediation timeline

2. Control-by-Control Assessment

For each control domain:

  • Status: Compliant / Partial / Non-Compliant / Not Assessed
  • Evidence Required: What auditors will ask for
  • Current Gap: What's missing
  • Remediation Steps: Specific actions to close the gap
  • Priority: Critical / High / Medium / Low
  • Effort: Hours/days estimate

3. Remediation Roadmap

  • Phase 1 (0-30 days): Critical fixes
  • Phase 2 (30-90 days): High priority items
  • Phase 3 (90-180 days): Full compliance

4. Evidence Checklist

  • Document inventory needed for audit
  • Policy templates to create
  • Technical configurations to verify

Agent Instructions

When the user requests a compliance audit:

  1. Ask which framework(s) they need assessed
  2. Gather context about their organization (industry, size, tech stack, data types)
  3. Generate the full audit report following the output format above
  4. For each control area, be specific — don't give generic advice. Reference the actual control numbers (e.g., SOC 2 CC6.1, ISO 27001 A.8.2)
  5. Prioritize findings by business risk, not alphabetical order
  6. Include cost estimates where possible (e.g., "penetration test: $5,000-$15,000")
  7. Flag any controls that require third-party tools or services

Be direct. No filler. Every finding should have a clear "do this" action attached.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.