experiment-ledger
Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Make ML training experiments reproducible and comparable. Use when fine-tuning models, comparing hyperparameters, changing datasets, or sharing GPU resources across contributors.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-skill-auditSkill
- api-contract-checkSkill
- build-rescueSkill
- change-narrativeSkill
- context-handoffSkill
- data-quality-gateSkill
- dataset-workshopSkill
- dependency-careSkill
- docs-syncSkill
- failure-forensicsSkill
- model-diff-reviewSkill
- model-eval-designSkill
- multi-agent-crosscheckSkill
- parallel-task-designSkill
- performance-proofSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- repo-scoutSkill
- research-evidence-mapSkill
- review-lensSkill
- safe-migrationSkill
- security-surfaceSkill
- spec-firstSkill
- sql-integrity-checkSkill
- test-driven-changeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Do not change training settings mid-run without recording a new experiment identity.
- Distinctive: line 23
Keep model checkpoints linked to their data and code versions.
- Distinctive: line 30
Do not claim a model improved from training loss alone.
- Distinctive: line 31
Never publish weights or datasets with unknown license, privacy, or safety status.
- Distinctive: line 32
Avoid expensive repeated runs when a small diagnostic can test the hypothesis.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Experiment Ledger
Before a run
- Record the hypothesis and the single or small set of variables being tested.
- Identify base model and immutable revision, tokenizer/chat template, training code commit, dataset version/checksum, train/validation split, seed, precision, optimizer, learning rate, schedule, batch size, gradient accumulation, epochs/steps, context length, and checkpoint policy.
- Estimate VRAM, disk, runtime, and approximate cost. Confirm the run will not interfere with another team member's GPU job or overwrite their checkpoints.
- Define baseline metrics and a stopping rule before inspecting results.
During a run
- Capture actual configuration, environment/library versions, host/device type, start/end time, logs, throughput, GPU memory, failures, and checkpoint paths.
- Track training and validation metrics with step numbers. Watch for divergence, collapsed output, data-loader stalls, and unexpectedly high memory.
- Do not change training settings mid-run without recording a new experiment identity.
After a run
- Evaluate with the same frozen evaluation harness used for the baseline.
- Compare quality, latency, memory, and cost. Include uncertainty and sample sizes where relevant.
- Keep model checkpoints linked to their data and code versions. Store only artifacts approved for the project.
- Record what to try next, even if the run failed.
Deliverable
A compact experiment card with ID, hypothesis, immutable inputs, config, resource usage, metrics, caveats, artifacts, and conclusion.
Boundaries
- Do not claim a model improved from training loss alone.
- Never publish weights or datasets with unknown license, privacy, or safety status.
- Avoid expensive repeated runs when a small diagnostic can test the hypothesis.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

