data-quality-gate
Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design validation checks for structured datasets and data pipelines. Use when ingesting, transforming, joining, exporting, or versioning data used by software or machine-learning systems.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-skill-auditSkill
- api-contract-checkSkill
- build-rescueSkill
- change-narrativeSkill
- context-handoffSkill
- dataset-workshopSkill
- dependency-careSkill
- docs-syncSkill
- experiment-ledgerSkill
- failure-forensicsSkill
- model-diff-reviewSkill
- model-eval-designSkill
- multi-agent-crosscheckSkill
- parallel-task-designSkill
- performance-proofSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- repo-scoutSkill
- research-evidence-mapSkill
- review-lensSkill
- safe-migrationSkill
- security-surfaceSkill
- spec-firstSkill
- sql-integrity-checkSkill
- test-driven-changeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Write down the schema: field names, types, requiredness, allowed ranges, units, identifiers, timezone conventions, and null semantics.
- Distinctive: line 16
Run validation on a sample first, then on the intended dataset.
- Distinctive: line 22
Do not silently impute, delete, or rewrite data to make validation pass.
- Distinctive: line 23
Never upload sensitive datasets to external services without authorization and a valid data-use basis.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Data Quality Gate
Procedure
- Define the intended use, data owner, source, allowable uses, sensitivity class, and expected freshness. Do not assume data is safe to use merely because it is accessible.
- Write down the schema: field names, types, requiredness, allowed ranges, units, identifiers, timezone conventions, and null semantics.
- Profile representative samples for missingness, duplicates, outliers, inconsistent categories, encoding problems, invalid dates, and suspicious distribution shifts.
- Validate joins and identifiers. Check row counts before and after transformations to detect accidental fan-out or dropped records.
- Define hard failures versus warnings. Make thresholds explicit and explain why they matter to downstream decisions.
- Preserve lineage: source snapshot, transformation version, timestamps, and deterministic parameters. Avoid recording secrets or personal records in logs.
- Run validation on a sample first, then on the intended dataset. Save a compact machine-readable summary and meaningful failure examples.
Deliverable
Include schema contract, validation checks, counts, examples of failed rows with sensitive values redacted, and the go/no-go decision.
Boundaries
- Do not silently impute, delete, or rewrite data to make validation pass.
- Never upload sensitive datasets to external services without authorization and a valid data-use basis.
- Label synthetic or inferred data; never represent it as collected fact.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

