agentleFS
voyager67voyager67/AgentFieldkit/skills/data-quality-gate/SKILL.md

data-quality-gate

Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design validation checks for structured datasets and data pipelines. Use when ingesting, transforming, joining, exporting, or versioning data used by software or machine-learning systems.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write down the schema: field names, types, requiredness, allowed ranges, units, identifiers, timezone conventions, and null semantics.

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Run validation on a sample first, then on the intended dataset.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not silently impute, delete, or rewrite data to make validation pass.

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Never upload sensitive datasets to external services without authorization and a valid data-use basis.

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Data Quality Gate

Procedure

  1. Define the intended use, data owner, source, allowable uses, sensitivity class, and expected freshness. Do not assume data is safe to use merely because it is accessible.
  2. Write down the schema: field names, types, requiredness, allowed ranges, units, identifiers, timezone conventions, and null semantics.
  3. Profile representative samples for missingness, duplicates, outliers, inconsistent categories, encoding problems, invalid dates, and suspicious distribution shifts.
  4. Validate joins and identifiers. Check row counts before and after transformations to detect accidental fan-out or dropped records.
  5. Define hard failures versus warnings. Make thresholds explicit and explain why they matter to downstream decisions.
  6. Preserve lineage: source snapshot, transformation version, timestamps, and deterministic parameters. Avoid recording secrets or personal records in logs.
  7. Run validation on a sample first, then on the intended dataset. Save a compact machine-readable summary and meaningful failure examples.

Deliverable

Include schema contract, validation checks, counts, examples of failed rows with sensitive values redacted, and the go/no-go decision.

Boundaries

  • Do not silently impute, delete, or rewrite data to make validation pass.
  • Never upload sensitive datasets to external services without authorization and a valid data-use basis.
  • Label synthetic or inferred data; never represent it as collected fact.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.