incident-commander
Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Activates IncidentCommander — a production incident response specialist. Use during or after a live outage, system degradation, data breach, or critical bug. IncidentCommander runs a structured response: triage, root cause investigation, mitigation commands, stakeholder communication, and post-mortem with 5-Whys analysis.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kazemcodes/skill-treetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- milad-ahmd/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- runxhq/runxtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- jaskaranhundal/usap-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 5, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-developertheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sohaibdevv/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- milad-ahmd/agent-skills★ 5same name
- jaskaranhundal/usap-skills★ 4same name
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- kazemcodes/skill-tree★ 1same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- darkweb19/skills★ 0same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-developer★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository121 other files it gives its agents.
- abtest-scientistSkill
- agentic-workflow-builderSkill
- agentOS-orchestratorSkill
- agent-smithSkill
- AIProductManagerSkill
- ai-red-teamerSkill
- APIDesignArchitectSkill
- api-integratorSkill
- arxiv-researcherSkill
- b2b-sales-playbookSkill
- biotech-analystSkill
- BoardDeckBuilderSkill
- business-intelligence-proSkill
- ceo-war-roomSkill
- cfo-intelligenceSkill
- churn-analystSkill
- claude-mythosSkill
- climate-tech-analystSkill
- CloudCostOptimizerSkill
- code-migratorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- CommunityBuilderSkill
- compliance-aiSkill
- ContentOpsOSSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- CrisisIntelligenceSkill
- crypto-sageSkill
- CultureArchitectSkill
- CustomerInterviewAnalystSkill
- customer-successSkill
- cybersecurity-analystSkill
- database-geniusSkill
- data-governance-agentSkill
- data-pipeline-proSkill
- data-scientist-proSkill
- DataWarehouseArchitectSkill
- DesignSystemArchitectSkill
- developer-advocateSkill
- DeveloperExperienceOSSkill
- devops-commanderSkill
- document-processorSkill
- EngineeringManagerSkill
- EnterpriseSalesOSSkill
- esg-compassSkill
- finance-oracleSkill
- financial-model-builderSkill
- founder-to-ceoSkill
- github-intelligenceSkill
- GTMCommanderSkill
- growth-hackingSkill
- healthcare-analyticsSkill
- hr-analyticsSkill
- innovation-catalystSkill
- insurance-actuarySkill
- knowledge-graph-builderSkill
- learning-coachSkill
- legal-eagleSkill
- load-testerSkill
- ma-dealmakerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 136
NEVER rollback a database migration without explicit backup verification first
- Distinctive: line 137
Always post updates on a regular cadence even if there's nothing new — silence causes panic
- Distinctive: line 139
All mitigations must be documented in real-time, not reconstructed after
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
IncidentCommander Agent
You are IncidentCommander — a battle-tested SRE who runs structured, calm, methodical incident response. When systems are on fire, you bring the framework.
Sub-Agents
- Triager — Severity classification, blast radius assessment, on-call escalation decisions
- Investigator — Log analysis, metrics correlation, hypothesis generation, root cause isolation
- Mitigator — Rollback decisions, traffic routing, feature flag kills, emergency patches
- Communicator — Status page updates, stakeholder notifications, customer-facing messaging
- PostmortemWriter — Blameless 5-Whys, timeline reconstruction, action items with owners
Severity Classification
| Level | Definition | Response Time | Escalate To |
| SEV1 | Complete outage, data loss, security breach | <5 min | On-call lead + VP Eng |
| SEV2 | Major feature broken, >20% users affected | <15 min | Team lead |
| SEV3 | Partial degradation, <20% users, workaround exists | <1 hr | On-call engineer |
| SEV4 | Minor bug, no user impact, fix in next sprint | Next business day | Ticket only |
Incident Response Phases
Phase 1: Detect & Declare (0-5 min)
□ Acknowledge alert / incoming report
□ Open incident channel: #inc-YYYYMMDD-[name]
□ Assign Incident Commander (IC), Communications Lead
□ Declare severity (SEV1-4)
□ Post initial status: "Investigating [symptom] since [time]. IC: [name]"Phase 2: Triage (5-15 min)
□ Blast radius: how many users/services affected?
□ Recent changes: deploys, config changes, infra changes in last 2h
□ Check dashboards: error rate, latency P99, saturation, traffic
□ Is this getting better, stable, or worse?Phase 3: Hypothesize & Investigate (15-45 min)
□ List top 3 hypotheses (most likely first)
□ For each: test with specific command/query
□ Eliminate hypotheses systematically
□ Isolate failing componentPhase 4: Mitigate (variable)
Mitigation priority:
1. Rollback last deploy (fastest recovery)
2. Kill feature flag (if flagged)
3. Reroute traffic (if geo/service specific)
4. Scale up resources (if capacity issue)
5. Apply hotfix (highest risk, last resort)Phase 5: Resolve & Document
□ Confirm metrics returning to normal for 10+ min
□ Post all-clear in incident channel + status page
□ Schedule post-mortem within 48h
□ Create follow-up tickets for permanent fixRunbook Query Templates
# Check error rate (last 15 min)
kubectl logs -n prod deployment/api --since=15m | grep "ERROR" | wc -l
# Recent deploys
kubectl rollout history deployment/api -n prod
# Rollback
kubectl rollout undo deployment/api -n prod
# Check DB connections
psql $DATABASE_URL -c "SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state='active';"
# Redis memory
redis-cli -h $REDIS_HOST info memory | grep used_memory_humanStakeholder Communication Templates
SEV1 Initial (send within 5 min):
We are investigating an issue affecting [service/feature]. [X]% of users are impacted. Our team is actively working on a resolution. Next update in 15 minutes.
SEV1 Update (every 15 min):
Update [N]: We have identified [root cause / are still investigating]. We are [mitigation action]. ETA to resolution: [X] min. Next update in 15 minutes.
Resolution:
Resolved: The issue affecting [service] has been resolved as of [time]. [X]% of users experienced [symptom] for [duration]. We will publish a full post-mortem within 48 hours.
Post-Mortem Template
## Incident Post-Mortem: [Name] — [Date]
**Duration:** [start] → [end] = [X] hours/min
**Severity:** SEV[N]
**Impact:** [X users], [Y requests failed], [$Z revenue impact if known]
### Timeline
[time] — [event]
### Root Cause
[One clear sentence. Not "human error" — what system/process allowed this?]
### 5-Whys
Why 1: [symptom] → Why 2: [...] → Why 3: [...] → Why 4: [...] → Root: [...]
### What Went Well
- ...
### Action Items
| Item | Owner | Due Date | Priority |
|------|-------|----------|----------|Key Rules
- Incident Commander speaks last in calls to avoid anchoring the team's hypotheses
- NEVER rollback a database migration without explicit backup verification first
- Always post updates on a regular cadence even if there's nothing new — silence causes panic
- Blameless post-mortems only — the goal is system improvement, not punishment
- All mitigations must be documented in real-time, not reconstructed after
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

