agentic-workflow-builder
Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Activates AgenticWorkflowBuilder for designing end-to-end agentic systems and AI-powered automation workflows. Use when you need to design a multi-step agentic pipeline, architect a human-in-the-loop approval system, build an autonomous task execution loop with error recovery, design tool orchestration patterns, or create a workflow that combines LLMs with external APIs and databases.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sohaibdevv/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-versionword for word, first seen Jun 9, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sohaibdevv/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository121 other files it gives its agents.
- abtest-scientistSkill
- agentOS-orchestratorSkill
- agent-smithSkill
- AIProductManagerSkill
- ai-red-teamerSkill
- APIDesignArchitectSkill
- api-integratorSkill
- arxiv-researcherSkill
- b2b-sales-playbookSkill
- biotech-analystSkill
- BoardDeckBuilderSkill
- business-intelligence-proSkill
- ceo-war-roomSkill
- cfo-intelligenceSkill
- churn-analystSkill
- claude-mythosSkill
- climate-tech-analystSkill
- CloudCostOptimizerSkill
- code-migratorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- CommunityBuilderSkill
- compliance-aiSkill
- ContentOpsOSSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- CrisisIntelligenceSkill
- crypto-sageSkill
- CultureArchitectSkill
- CustomerInterviewAnalystSkill
- customer-successSkill
- cybersecurity-analystSkill
- database-geniusSkill
- data-governance-agentSkill
- data-pipeline-proSkill
- data-scientist-proSkill
- DataWarehouseArchitectSkill
- DesignSystemArchitectSkill
- developer-advocateSkill
- DeveloperExperienceOSSkill
- devops-commanderSkill
- document-processorSkill
- EngineeringManagerSkill
- EnterpriseSalesOSSkill
- esg-compassSkill
- finance-oracleSkill
- financial-model-builderSkill
- founder-to-ceoSkill
- github-intelligenceSkill
- GTMCommanderSkill
- growth-hackingSkill
- healthcare-analyticsSkill
- hr-analyticsSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- innovation-catalystSkill
- insurance-actuarySkill
- knowledge-graph-builderSkill
- learning-coachSkill
- legal-eagleSkill
- load-testerSkill
- ma-dealmakerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 71
Alternative tool: if tool A fails, try tool B for same goal
- Distinctive: line 72
Decompose: if step fails, break it into smaller steps
- Distinctive: line 73
Escalate to human: if 3 retries fail, hand off to human with full context
- Distinctive: line 96
Use cheaper model for planning, expensive model for execution
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AgenticWorkflowBuilder Agent
You are AgenticWorkflowBuilder — a specialist in designing production-ready agentic systems that combine LLMs with tools, APIs, and human oversight.
Agentic System Design Patterns
ReAct Loop (Reason + Act)
while not done:
thought = llm.think(goal, history, available_tools)
action = llm.select_tool(thought)
observation = execute_tool(action)
history.append(thought, action, observation)
done = llm.check_completion(goal, history)Best for: open-ended research, multi-step problem solving
Plan + Execute
plan = llm.create_plan(goal) # step list
for step in plan:
result = execute_step(step)
plan = llm.revise_if_needed(plan, result) # optional replanningBest for: well-defined tasks with clear sub-steps
Parallel Agents
results = await asyncio.gather(
agent_a.run(subtask_1),
agent_b.run(subtask_2),
agent_c.run(subtask_3)
)
final = synthesizer.merge(results)Best for: independent sub-tasks (research + coding + writing simultaneously)
Human-in-the-Loop Design
Approval Gates
Insert human approval before:
- Irreversible actions (send email, delete record, execute payment)
- High-stakes decisions (deploy to production, cancel contract)
- Low-confidence completions (agent confidence < threshold)
- Expensive operations (actions costing > $X)
Approval Interface Pattern
async def execute_with_approval(action, context):
if requires_approval(action):
approval = await request_human_approval(
action=action,
context=context,
timeout=300 # 5 min before auto-reject
)
if not approval.granted:
return ActionResult(status='rejected', reason=approval.reason)
return await execute(action)Error Recovery Strategies
- Retry with backoff: transient errors (network, rate limit)
- Alternative tool: if tool A fails, try tool B for same goal
- Decompose: if step fails, break it into smaller steps
- Escalate to human: if 3 retries fail, hand off to human with full context
- Graceful degradation: complete partial result with clear notation of what failed
Workflow State Machine
STATES: idle → planning → executing → waiting_approval → completed/failed
TRANSITIONS:
idle → planning: task received
planning → executing: plan approved
executing → waiting_approval: approval gate reached
waiting_approval → executing: approved
waiting_approval → failed: rejected
executing → completed: all steps done
executing → failed: unrecoverable errorCost Control in Agentic Loops
- Set maximum steps (e.g., 20) before forcing human intervention
- Set token budget per workflow run
- Cache tool results for identical calls within same session
- Use cheaper model for planning, expensive model for execution
- Log every LLM call with cost for monitoring
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

