smoke-check
Skill1 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Critical-path smoke gate before QA hand-off — runs the automated suite. A failed check means the build is not QA-ready.
10 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiosedited, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiosedited, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- xmtp/libxmtptheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Pluginedited, first seen Oct 5, 2026
- SimonKreis-Richard/oracle-fusion-agentic-toolkittheir own version, first seen Sep 27, 2026
- dawn840705/claude-code-studiosedited, first seen Aug 28, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 7
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k92% same
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 11814% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1712% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 814% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 513% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 113% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 115% same
Wrote their own version · 3
- xmtp/libxmtp★ 127same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- SimonKreis-Richard/oracle-fusion-agentic-toolkit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository153 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CCGS Skill Testing Framework/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- settingsSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- smoke-checkSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 2 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Every AskUserQuestion call follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and …
- Very specific: line 53
If --platform is provided, Phase 4 adds platform-specific batches and Phase 5 outputs a per-platform verdict table in addition to the …
- Common: line 93
Do not attempt to edit source code or test files.
- Common: line 97
Use it for rapid re-checks after fixing a specific failure.
- Very specific: line 98
Use AskUserQuestion for all manual smoke check verification.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys automation,workflow,qa.level,testing.strict
Smoke Check
This skill is the gate between "implementation done" and "ready for QA hand-off". It runs the automated test suite, checks for test coverage gaps, batch-verifies critical paths with the developer, and produces a PASS/FAIL report.
The rule is simple: a build that fails smoke check does not go to QA. Handing a broken build to QA wastes their time and demoralises the team.
Output: production/qa/smoke-[date].md
Every AskUserQuestion call follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md
(collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds;
automation_always_ask categories always prompt).
qa.level: at minimal, smoke-check is optional — if
run, a FAIL is advisory and never blocks hand-off, and a project with no game
tests is checked by its build, launch and critical paths alone (Phase 1 step 1); at standard, it is required
before a phase transition; at full, before every commit. This sits in front of
the Phase 6 testing.strict.config resolution (which only matters once a smoke run
gates). Distinct axis from workflow.
Parse Arguments
Arguments can be combined: /smoke-check sprint --platform console
Base mode (first argument, default: sprint):
sprint— full smoke check against the current sprint's storiesquick— skip coverage scan (Phase 3) and Batch 3; use for rapid re-checks
Platform flag (--platform, default: none):
--platform pc— add PC-specific checks (keyboard, mouse, windowed mode)--platform console— add console-specific checks (gamepad, TV safe zones, platform certification requirements)--platform mobile— add mobile-specific checks (touch, portrait/landscape, battery/thermal behaviour)--platform all— add all platform variants; output per-platform verdict table
If --platform is provided, Phase 4 adds platform-specific batches and
Phase 5 outputs a per-platform verdict table in addition to the overall verdict.
Phase 1: Detect Test Setup
Read references/1-detect-setup.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Phase 2: Run Automated Tests
Read references/2-run-tests.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Phase 3: Check Test Coverage
Read references/3-coverage.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Phase 4: Run Manual Smoke Checks
Read references/4-manual-checks.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Phase 5: Generate Report
Read references/5-report.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Phase 6: Write and Gate
Read references/6-write-gate.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
Collaborative Protocol
Applies in collaborative mode (the default). For guided and
autonomous modes, see .claude/docs/automation-modes.md — the rules below
describe what collaborative mode requires, not universal behavior.
- Never treat NOT RUN as automatic FAIL — record it as NOT RUN and let the developer confirm status manually. Unconfirmed NOT RUN yields NOT ASSESSED, not FAIL — and not a pass verdict either, which is what it used to yield.
- Never auto-fix failures — report them and state what must be resolved. Do not attempt to edit source code or test files.
- PASS WITH WARNINGS does not block QA hand-off — it records advisory
gaps for
/story-doneto follow up on. quickargument skips Phase 3 (coverage scan) and Phase 4 Batch 3. Use it for rapid re-checks after fixing a specific failure.- Use
AskUserQuestionfor all manual smoke check verification. - Never write the report without asking — Phase 6 requires explicit approval before any file is created.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

