redo
Skill452 starsChanged 10 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Redo a prior pstack run at the current session's higher effort or stronger model, treating its plan as a draft: rerun only the plan, design, subagent and seat lanes, code and review judgments that ran below the current level, and reuse the rest. Use for \"redo <plan, page or PR>\", \"run poteto again on it at this effort\", \"treat this plan as a draft\", a teammate's run made at a lower effort, or a Babysit whose levels check finds a unit below target.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- Scylla23/modelroutertheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- udecode/plateword for word, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- udecode/dotaiword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- udecode/plate★ 17k100% same
- udecode/dotai★ 1.2k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Scylla23/modelrouter★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 4-ultraciteSkill
- agent-browser-issueSkill
- better-auth-best-practicesSkill
- changeset-doc-syncSkill
- changeset-resolveSkill
- changesetSkill
- chipsSkill
- cleanupSkill
- component-colocationSkill
- concave-paritySkill
- concaveSkill
- convex-release-auditSkill
- designSkill
- jotai-xSkill
- kitcnSkill
- next-dev-loopSkill
- nextjsSkill
- package-release-auditSkill
- plan-pageSkill
- react-querySkill
- research-wikiSkill
- shadcn-paritySkill
- sync-convex-authSkill
- test-auditSkill
- toastSkill
- turborepoSkill
- verifySkill
- video-transcriptsSkill
- walkthroughSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
When no unit is redo, say so on the page.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Redo
A run made at a lower effort or on a weaker model is a draft. Redo follows pstack's Session pickup, except that it redoes the work that ran below the current level and reuses everything else. Load pstack:poteto-mode first; its playbooks and the project's gates still own each step.
- Find the draft. A plan path is the draft. For a page link, find the plan whose subject or plan file holds that
Page:line (git grep -l 'Page: <link>'in the plans directory); for a PR, the plan its body links, or on another person's PR, the plan your own comment links. Read the plan, its subject file, its decision log and its run directory under<plans>/artifacts/. Never read the published page, because another account may own it. - Read the levels.
node .agents/pstack/levels.mjs <log>...prints the current session's level and the configured seats, then marks each lead stretch and seat round of the draft's logsatorbelow, with the reason for eachbelow. A stretch with noleadrow, or a seat with no level, counts as below. A subagent role runs at its models-sheet line. - Write the ledger. Open a new iteration of the draft's subject with the
plan-pageskill. Its Brief names the draft and the level change, and its## Redotable lists every unit of the draft with its producer, that producer's level and one verdict:redo: judgment a producer made below the level the current setup gives its role. That covers the plan and its Defaults, design picks, each subagent or seat lane, each panel finding's disposition, the code eachbuilt:row names, and the Close and its claims. It also covers any unit the draft marked weak: apartial,gap,openorinconclusiverow, amissingseat, a same-family round or a dismissed critical finding.reuse: deterministic evidence on bytes the redo will not change, such as a test run, a proof log or a render, and any lane already at or above the current level. Cite it, and do not run it again.recheck: reused evidence whose inputs a redo may change. It reruns after the redo. When no unit isredo, say so on the page. For a PR, go on to step 6; otherwise stop.
- Redo the plan and design first. Work from the owner's asks and the draft's inputs before reading the draft's conclusions, then compare and log each pick kept, changed or dropped. A design step that runs
architector an arena takes the draft's design as one more candidate. An unbuilt draft plan becomessuperseded; a built one stays and the new iteration continues it. - Rerun the lanes. Each
redolane runs again on its configured model and level, from its brief in the run directory. Re-judge every reused seat answer at the current level, and log a newpanelrow for each finding whose disposition changes. - Clean up the code. Run the project's Babysit playbook, or pstack's, over the draft's diff at the current level, without its level check. The fixes then take the project's usual gates and land by its Delivery rule. When the draft is a PR, push the fixes to that PR's head branch instead, as Babysit does.
- Recheck and close. Rerun each
recheckproof. The Close lists what was redone and what changed, what was reused and why, and any unit whose level stayed unknown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

