agent-browser-issue
Skill452 starsChanged 23 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Open a concise GitHub follow-up for reusable browser-use limitations. Use when browser automation is blocked by a likely tool-side issue that is worth fixing separately, especially for clicks, dropdowns, file inputs, focus traps, or other repeatable agent/browser failures.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use this only for likely reusable agent or browser tooling bugs.
- Very specific: line 67
if the browser or tool failure exposes a user-action parity gap, load agent-native-reviewer and note that gap in the issue
- Distinctive: line 70
keep moving if the product task is still otherwise fixable
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Browser Issue
Handle $ARGUMENTS.
Use this only for likely reusable agent or browser tooling bugs. Do not use it for:
- auth or SSO gates
- manual human gates
- product bugs on the site itself
- one-off flaky noise with no minimal repro
Collect
Capture only the minimum:
- page or URL
- action attempted
- exact block
- expected vs actual
- minimal repro
- screenshot only if it adds signal
Issue
Open a GitHub issue with:
- a short title focused on the browser or tool failure
- label
agent:browser - concise body
Body shape:
## URL
<url>
## Action
<what the agent tried>
## Block
<what failed>
## Expected
<what should have happened>
## Actual
<what happened instead>
## Repro
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...After
- if the browser or tool failure exposes a user-action parity gap, load
agent-native-reviewerand note that gap in the issue - link the issue in the task caveat or handoff
- keep moving if the product task is still otherwise fixable
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/autoreview/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/autoreview/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- 4-ultraciteSkill
- agent-native-reviewerSkill
- architecture-cleanupSkill
- autoclosureSkill
- autogoalSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- autoSkill
- avoid-feature-creepSkill
- better-auth-best-practicesSkill
- changeset-doc-syncSkill
- changeset-resolveSkill
- changesetSkill
- component-colocationSkill
- concave-paritySkill
- concaveSkill
- convex-release-auditSkill
- designSkill
- deslopSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- grill-with-visionSkill
- hard-cutSkill
- jotai-xSkill
- kitcnSkill
- linear-backlogSkill
- major-taskSkill
- next-dev-loopSkill
- nextjsSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- package-release-auditSkill
- prototypeSkill
- react-querySkill
- research-wikiSkill
- resolve-pr-feedbackSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- scenariosSkill
- shadcn-paritySkill
- sync-convex-authSkill
- sync-visionSkill
- taskSkill
- tddSkill
- testingSkill
- toastSkill
- to-milestoneSkill
- to-prdSkill
- turborepoSkill
- video-transcriptsSkill
- visionSkill
- walkthroughSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

