agentleFS
udecodeudecode/better-convex/.agents/skills/chips/SKILL.md

chips

Skill452 starsChanged 10 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Run the project's suggested-task ledger, the chips. /chips alone brings this session's open tasks up to date: it applies what the ledger helper says, settles stale and split tasks, cards what can start and reports the board, and /chips all also takes the ship-list tasks and the ones no live session owns. Use for /chips, /chips offer, start or drop, \"what chips are open\", \"suggest a task for X\", \"update the chips\", \"clean up the chips\", \"which chips are stale\", at the last hand-back of a run that offered a task, and whenever pstack would file a tracked issue, a follow-up, a reflect Backlog item or an out-of-band PR.

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 14 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 14

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check items: look each session up with the session tool, read the last report of each archived one, and log the row chips.md's Sweep gives …

    line 32
  2. Very specific:

    When the tree already holds its fix, log dismissed done, citing the commit.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    When its target was deleted since its offer, log dismissed superseded.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    When a PR it waits on closed without merging, log updated with the waits it has now.

    line 39
  5. Very specific:

    When two open tasks answer one question, log the topic move and dismissed dup that chips.md's Sweep gives.

    line 40
  6. Very specific:

    Run chips --session <id> first, and read the brief of each open task whose topic or title touches the finding with chips brief <id>.

    line 53
  7. Very specific:

    When the finding belongs to an offered task's question and that task holds no card, log a folded row on it with what the finding adds.

    line 55
  8. Very specific:

    When it belongs to the question of a started task or of one that holds a card, offer a new task in that topic with waits: task:<id>.

    line 56
  9. Very specific:

    Leave every other task to /chips.

    line 67
  10. Very specific:

    Run chips brief <id> and work from what it prints, not from the card's prompt.

    line 76
  11. Very specific:

    When the brief's State: line says neither Ready nor Started, tell the owner what it says and stop.

    line 77
  12. Very specific:

    Before writing a path the task does not list, log another started row with it.

    line 79
  13. Very specific:

    When the task is started, log dismissed stopped.

    line 84
  14. Very specific:

    When another session holds its card, log dismissed declined with that card:.

    line 86
  15. Very specific:

    When it holds no card, log dismissed declined.

    line 87

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Chips

Chips are a project's suggested tasks, the side work outside a run's target, or a measurement that does not fit a run's one-hour budget, that the owner can start in a new session. They live as rows in one ledger per project, and a card in a suggest tool is only a view of one. The law is .agents/pstack/rules/chips.md, which sync-pstack renders into every project. Read it in full before this session's first ledger write, except in a session a card started, whose brief holds what its own task's rows need. This skill runs its modes; it adds no rule of its own.

Every command below is node .agents/pstack/decisions-check.mjs <command>, run from the project's checkout, which a card session that opened in its own worktree names by the path its brief prints. In a trunk project, where every session works in its own worktree, every command runs as written from that worktree, because the helper switches to the main checkout on its own for chips and for an append to the ledger. Get this session's id from the runtime's session tool, such as Claude Code desktop's get_session with self, and pass --session <id> to every board read. A runtime with no session tool reads the board without it.

ModeUse it to
Sweep, /chips with no argument, /chips all or /chips codexbring this session's open tasks up to date, card what can start and report the board; all also lists every priority and takes the ship-list tasks and the tasks no live session owns, and codex forces the Codex handoff on each card it offers, outside trunk delivery
Offeradd a finding, the one way new work enters the ledger
Closecard the run's own Ready offers at its last hand-back, without the sweep
Startbegin a task a card opened, in the card's session
Droprecord the owner's word to drop a task

pstack calls these modes too. Where a pstack step files a tracked issue, a follow-up or a reflect Backlog item, or puts an out-of-band fix in its own PR, the lead runs Offer instead for a new P0 or P1 finding, for an item the run's verdict judges or for any finding in a babysit run, and otherwise lists the finding in the plan's Open work, as chips.md's Offer says. It runs a sweep only on /chips, as chips.md's Sweep says, and Close at the last hand-back of a run that offered a task, never after a sweep, whose card pass replaces it. A question about open chips, such as "what's next" over side work, runs steps 1 and 6 without step 1's cleanup, logs no row and offers no card.

Sweep

  1. In a trunk project, first run node .agents/pstack/setup.mjs from the main checkout, which fast-forwards it when no local edit is in the way. Run chips --session <id> and chips stale. The stale report lists each open task with its age, its priority, a ship item that closed, the paths it writes that were deleted since its offer or are missing, the commits on its paths since its offer, its closed PR waits and its card, the likeliest stale first.

    Then clean up the card sessions of landed tasks, as chips.md's Cleanup says. Save the session tool's list of every session, archived ones included, such as Claude Code desktop's list_sessions with include_archived and a limit above the session count, as a JSON array in the run directory, and run chips cleanup --sessions <file> --session <id>. For each session it lists under Archive or Keep, read that session's last report with the session tool and fix each piece of workflow friction the report leaves unsettled, as chips.md's Landing says. Then archive each session it lists under Archive, save the list again, run chips cleanup again and run the scan.mjs --remove command it prints. Keep the first run's Report lines for step 6. Under /chips all, read the board again with chips all --session <id> --sessions <file>, using the list saved last, as chips.md's Owner says, and use that board from here on. A runtime with no session tool skips this.

  2. Apply the pass the Do list shows, together with the run's own rows that chips.md's Sweep lists, in one append --from <file> batch:

    • Withdrawal pass: call the dismiss tool on each card it names, then log the row the tool's report decides, as each item says.
    • Ledger pass: log each row it names. For a prioritize item, judge the task's priority from its brief as chips.md's Priority says, and check that a bug's repro still fails before you claim P0 or P1 for it. For a ship item, append the offer it prints.
    • Card pass: leave it to step 5.
    • Check items: look each session up with the session tool, read the last report of each archived one, and log the row chips.md's Sweep gives for it. A task the tool cannot settle stays started, and step 6 says why.

    Run the same board read again, chips all --session <id> --sessions <file> under /chips all and chips --session <id> otherwise, and repeat until the Do list shows only the card pass or nothing you can apply. When append refuses a batch, fix or drop the refused row as its message says and append the rest.

  3. Judge each task the stale report gives a fact, from its brief, those facts and the code, and append the rows in one batch:
    • When the tree already holds its fix, log dismissed done, citing the commit.
    • When its target was deleted since its offer, log dismissed superseded. When a path only moved, log updated with the new writes:.
    • A missing path is one the offer named wrongly or one the task will create. Find the real path with git ls-files and log updated with it, or leave a path the task creates. A carded task's updated only drops paths, so its session names the real one in its started row.
    • When a PR it waits on closed without merging, log updated with the waits it has now.
    • When two open tasks answer one question, log the topic move and dismissed dup that chips.md's Sweep gives. When the keeper holds a card or is started, log waits: task:<keeper> on the other instead.
    • For a started task, log landed when a commit holds its change. Step 2's check item settles the rest from its session, so never ask the owner whether that session still runs.
    • When the report marks a task possibly thin, find its finding in the plan, log or run its offer names, and log it as a folded row. When this session holds the task's card, withdraw it first. When another session holds it, fold the finding once that card leaves the queue. When no source holds the finding, leave the task as it is. Step 6 says which tasks stay thin.
    • Judge the dependencies and effort of each task that holds a card, as chips.md's Cards says.
    • Judge each task's own priority again against chips.md's Priority; the stale report prints it as own when a waiting task raises it. Log updated with the right priority: and its evidence when it differs. When the report says a task's ship item closed, log dismissed done when the item's work landed, or updated with the priority its work has now.
  4. Repeat step 2 for what step 3 changed.
  5. Card pass: before each card, judge the task's dependencies and effort as chips.md's Cards says. Then offer each card the Do list names with what chips brief <id> prints as its prompt, verbatim, the brief's first line as its title, which starts with the task's priority such as [P0], shortened to fit the tool's title limit with that priority and any (xhigh) or (fast) kept, the effort its brief shows and its own worktree, such as start_session's use_worktree: true, because the tool's default shares this session's folder when this session did not start in a worktree, all in the same turn, then log carded with card: and session:, plus codex: always under /chips codex outside trunk delivery. A runtime with no suggest tool lists each Ready task in the plan's ## Open work instead, or in the reply when the run keeps no plan, as chips.md's Limits says. Before each card, check whether the task's writes: touch an active plan, one whose Status: starts with a word status.mjs counts as active, such as building. That plan's files are the plan itself, its decision log and its subject file <plans>/topics/<topic>.md. The topic is its Topic: line, or the first entry of the frontmatter list that pageTopic.field in .agents/pstack.json names. Its session is rewriting those files, and chips sees only ledger tasks, so log updated with the task's waits plus run:<that plan> instead of the card.
  6. Report first the cleanup's Report and Keep lines, each task the sweep cleaned up with its commits, and each worktree scan.mjs --remove kept with its reason. Then report in plain words each row this sweep logged, one line each, then what can start and whether it has a card, with start <id> beside each Ready task the 10-card limit left uncarded, what is started, why it stays open and that "drop <id>" closes it, what waits and on what, grouped by the thing waited on, and the fast work owed a review. When a task waits on landed work the owner has not committed, the report suggests that commit before it lists what can start, naming each landed task and how many waiting tasks its commit frees, because those tasks can start only after it. Name each task by id and title. The report names each commit by its subject and ends with its links, the cleanup lines' links included, as writing.md's Links in replies rule says, with the owner and repository read from the checkout's origin remote. The report asks the owner nothing. When a session's report or its plan holds a question for the owner, the lead settles it. It answers from the law that governs the question, as a look Defaults row in that plan with a decision row and a message to the session. When no law answers it, the lead offers it as a decide task when it is P0 or P1, and otherwise lists it in the report, as chips.md's Offer says for a run that keeps no plan. The owner reverses a dismissal by asking, and the lead offers the task again.

Offer

Offer only a new P0 or P1 finding, unless it is an item the run's verdict judges, a finding in a babysit run or a measurement the Time budget rule sends here, as chips.md's Offer says. List any other finding in the plan's Open work, or in the reply when the run keeps no plan. A project hook that finds recurring work due offers its own P2 or P3 task with via: hook without this mode, and the session it stops runs Close on that task.

  1. Run chips --session <id> first, and read the brief of each open task whose topic or title touches the finding with chips brief <id>.
  2. Pick the row as chips.md's Offer says:
    • When the finding belongs to an offered task's question and that task holds no card, log a folded row on it with what the finding adds.
    • When it belongs to the question of a started task or of one that holds a card, offer a new task in that topic with waits: task:<id>. chips merges it into a carded task once the card is withdrawn.
    • Otherwise offer a new task with an id from chips id, a plain imperative title, (xhigh) only where chips.md's Title rule gives it, and its writes:, topic:, kind:, priority: with the evidence chips.md's Priority asks, via: on a P2 or P3 offer, waits:, owns: and session:, this session's id, which makes it this session's task, as chips.md's Owner says. Its waits: include run:<plan> for each active plan whose files it writes, as Sweep step 5 finds them. Reuse a topic the board lists when the finding answers its question. A new topic names one owner question, never an area.
  3. Append it with append <ledger> chip "<id> <title>" "<finding>" "<tokens>" <result>, where <ledger> is <plans>/artifacts/suggested-tasks.decisions.tsv in trunk delivery and <plans>/suggested-tasks.decisions.tsv otherwise, the path chips.md's Ledger names. When append refuses the row, its message names the route; follow it.
  4. Card it in Close at the run's last hand-back, not now, because a later finding in this run may still fold into it, and a carded task takes no folded row.

Close

A run that offered a task runs this at its last hand-back, once it has delivered its work, closed its plan and made its last offer, reflect's included, as chips.md's Close says. A session a card started runs it too, after its friction fixes and before scan.mjs --landed, as chips.md's Landing says.

  1. Run chips brief <id> for each task this run offered, whose State: line says at any priority whether it is Ready and what it waits on, and read no board, because a board's card pass lists tasks this run did not offer. For each task this run offered that is Ready, judge its dependencies and effort as chips.md's Cards says. For a task that needs another open task's result, log an updated row with its waits plus task:<that id> in place of its card. Append these rows in one batch before any card, because a new wait can raise the priority the next brief prints, and a card's title cannot change.
  2. Offer a card for each of the rest the way Sweep step 5 offers one, highest priority first, within the 10-card limit and all in one turn. Then append each card's carded row in one append --from batch.
  3. Leave every other task to /chips.
  4. Add one line to the reply beside the page link: how many tasks the run offered, how many it carded and what each of the rest waits on, with start <id> beside each Ready task the limit left uncarded. /chips cards a waiting task once its wait clears, or /chips all for a ship-list task or once this session is gone.

A runtime with no suggest tool still runs step 1, then lists each Ready task in the reply instead of carding it, as chips.md's Limits says for a plan that has closed, and leaves step 4's /chips and /chips all hints out, because they card nothing there.

Start

A session a card opened, or one the lead started on the owner's "start <id>", runs this before it writes anything, as chips.md's Sweep says.

  1. Run chips brief <id> and work from what it prints, not from the card's prompt.
  2. When the brief's State: line says neither Ready nor Started, tell the owner what it says and stop.
  3. Log started with writes: naming any path the brief lacks and session: naming this session's id where the runtime's session tool gives one, then run chips brief <id> again, because the task could change until that row. When the session tool shows this session above the brief's Effort:, say so to the owner in your first reply, because a session cannot lower its own effort.
  4. Before writing a path the task does not list, log another started row with it. When append refuses that row because another started task writes that path outside the checkout, which happens only outside trunk delivery, leave the path alone and tell the owner.
  5. When the work is done, land it and log landed, then fix the workflow friction you hit as the brief says, then run Close on each task you offered, then remove the worktree as the last command, as the brief's paragraph on landing and chips.md's Landing say. A review task's session first logs reviewed on each task it reviewed.

Drop

  1. When the task is started, log dismissed stopped.
  2. When the task holds a card this session offered, call the dismiss tool on it. When the tool reports the owner started it, log started and tell the owner. Otherwise log dismissed declined with its card:, in place of uncarded, so no merge lands between the two.
  3. When another session holds its card, log dismissed declined with that card:.
  4. When it holds no card, log dismissed declined.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.