drawing-review
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Reviews construction documents for drawing standard compliance, discipline coordination, code compliance, and constructability.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormSkill
- budget-checkSkill
- change-orderSkill
- deficiency-reportSkill
- design-decisionSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- estimateSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- gate-checkSkill
- handover-checklistSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- material-auditSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- occupancy-checklistSkill
- onboardSkill
- phase-planSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- punch-listSkill
- regulatory-adaptSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- revision-logSkill
- schedule-analysisSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- setup-project-typeSkill
- site-bulletinSkill
- site-inspectionSkill
- startSkill
- team-envelopeSkill
- team-handoverSkill
- team-interiorSkill
- team-mepSkill
- team-safetySkill
- team-siteSkill
- team-structuralSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
When this skill is invoked:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When this skill is invoked:
- Read the target file(s) in full.
- Read CLAUDE.md for project standards.
- Identify the discipline and apply discipline-specific standards.
- Evaluate against drawing standards:
- Proper drawing number format
- Scale and north arrow present
- Revision tracking current
- Cross-references to other disciplines
- Dimensions complete and consistent
- Notes and legends clear
- Check coordination:
- No conflicts with other discipline documents
- Structural penetrations coordinated
- MEP routing doesn't conflict with architecture
- Clearances maintained
- Check code compliance:
- Egress requirements met
- Fire ratings shown
- ADA compliance verified
- Energy code requirements addressed
- Output the review:
## Drawing Review: [File/System Name]
### Standards Compliance: [X/6 passing]
### Coordination: [CLEAN / ISSUES FOUND]
### Code Compliance: [COMPLIANT / ISSUES FOUND]
### Positive Observations
### Required Changes
### Suggestions
### Verdict: [APPROVED / APPROVED WITH COMMENTS / CHANGES REQUIRED]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.