responsibility-matrix
Skill0 starsChanged yesterdayMITView on GitHub
Make clear who does what with a RACI matrix: for each task or decision, who is Responsible for doing it, who is Accountable (one person), who is Consulted and who is Informed, then check the matrix for gaps and overloads. Use when roles are unclear, when tasks fall between people, when two people think they decide, or when a team, a family or a group of volunteers shares a project. Triggers: "RACI", "who does what", "roles and responsibilities", "responsibility matrix", "qui fait quoi", "matrice RACI", "rôles et responsabilités", "quién hace qué", "matriz RACI", "roles y responsabilidades".
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- decision-makingSkill
- delegation-briefSkill
- meeting-toolkitSkill
- project-budgetSkill
- project-charterSkill
- project-recoverySkill
- project-scheduleSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- risk-registerSkill
- scope-changeSkill
- stakeholder-mapSkill
- status-updateSkill
- vendor-selectionSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
- work-breakdownSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
When everyone is responsible, nobody is.
- Very specific: line 20
After work-breakdown, as soon as several people share the work.
- Distinctive: line 21
When tasks fall through the cracks or two people think they own the same decision.
- Very specific: line 22
Not to map influence and communication: use stakeholder-map.
- Distinctive: line 51
Every row has exactly one A and at least one R.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Responsibility matrix (RACI)
When everyone is responsible, nobody is. This skill gives each task and each decision exactly one accountable person, and shows who must be consulted or simply informed.
When to use
- After
work-breakdown, as soon as several people share the work. - When tasks fall through the cracks or two people think they own the same decision.
- Not to map influence and communication: use
stakeholder-map.
Inputs
- The task list or the main decisions of the project.
- The people involved and their availability.
Method
- List the rows: the main tasks and, separately, the main decisions (budget, choice of supplier, go-live date).
- List the columns: the people or roles involved.
- Fill the matrix: R (responsible: does the work), A (accountable: approves and answers for the result), C (consulted before: two-way), I (informed after: one-way).
- Apply the rules: exactly one A per row; at least one R per row; few C, because each C slows things down; the A can also be the R on small projects.
- Check the matrix: rows without A or R (gaps), people with too many R (overload), people with only I on things they care about (future conflict).
- Share it and confirm it with each person; update it when someone joins or leaves.
Output
### RACI: <project> (version <n>, <date>)
| Task or decision | Person 1 | Person 2 | Person 3 | Person 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| … | A, R | C | I | – |
Gaps: … | Overloads: … | To confirm with: …Quality bar
- Every row has exactly one A and at least one R.
- Decisions are listed, not only tasks.
- Overloads and gaps are named, with a fix.
- Written in the user's language, with the terms below.
Terminology
| English | Français | Español |
| RACI matrix | Matrice RACI | Matriz RACI |
| Responsible | Réalisateur (R) | Responsable de ejecutar (R) |
| Accountable | Approbateur, responsable final (A) | Responsable final, aprobador (A) |
| Consulted | Consulté (C) | Consultado (C) |
| Informed | Informé (I) | Informado (I) |
| Role | Rôle | Rol |
Sources
- Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

