agentleFS
tejastn10tejastn10/workbench/skills/workflows/ship-change/SKILL.md

ship-change

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

The development loop for a change that fits in roughly one session — orient if needed, pick the domain skill for the area, build test-first, deslopify, clean the commits, self-review, security-check if warranted, ship. Use when asked to "fix X", "add Y", "change Z" and it's a bounded change, not a multi-session feature (that's new-feature).

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If mid-change you discover it's actually a multi-session job → stop, switch to workflows/new-feature.

    line 33

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Workflow — ship a change

Orchestrator for the common case: a bounded change, one session. Invoke each named skill with the Skill tool.

Loop

#InvokeWhen
1planning/orientfirst time working in this repo — skip if you know it
2the domain skill for what you're touching:
design/evolve-contractchanging an existing API / response / enum / event
data/review-query · data/postgres-indexing · data/mongo-modeling · data/redis-patternsthe change is a query / schema / cache path
queues/sqs-consumer · queues/kafka · queues/bullmqthe change is a producer / consumer
observability/instrument-serviceadding a service surface that needs visibility
3quality/tddbuild it — failing test first, minimum to pass
4quality/deslopifybefore committing — remove restating comments, impossible-case guards, etc.
5quality/split-commitone logical change per conventional commit
6pr-review/<stack>review your own diff as if it were someone else's
7security/security-reviewonly if the change touches auth, user input, file handling, external requests, or dependencies
8deployment/deploy-serviceif you're the one shipping it

Rules

  • Step 2 is "load the reference for the area you're in" — often just one skill.
  • Steps 4–6 are non-negotiable on any change that touched code.
  • Step 7 is conditional — don't run a full security pass on a copy tweak.
  • If mid-change you discover it's actually a multi-session job → stop, switch to workflows/new-feature.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.