agentleFS
tejastn10tejastn10/workbench/skills/planning/to-questionnaire/SKILL.md

to-questionnaire

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn a decision you can't settle yourself into a Markdown questionnaire for the one person who holds the missing knowledge — a client, a domain expert, the exec who owns the business rules. Grills you only about the send (who it's going to, what you need back), never the subject, then drafts questions aimed at the gap. Use when a `grill` session stalls on something that isn't yours to answer, or the user says "send this to the client / to X", "I need answers from someone else".

129 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, claude-handoff and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 34 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 34 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 35 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 35 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-fragments

    Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.

    Also in 35 projects that use this

  • simo97Skill

    migrate-to-shoehorn

    Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

    Also in 34 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 121 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run it in the same conversation as the grilling session that stalled — the open questions are already in context.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not interview the user about the subject.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Not branching (flat grouped list, not a tree).

    line 43

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 121 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

To questionnaire

Adapted from mattpocock/skills to-questionnaire (MIT). Companion to planning/grill: grilling mines the user's own head, this mines someone else's.

Run it in the same conversation as the grilling session that stalled — the open questions are already in context. Started fresh, it knows nothing about the subject and the user has to re-supply it.

Interview — two questions, then stop

  1. Who is it going to? Role, expertise, relationship to the user. Fixes tone and how much context the document carries — an outside client needs orienting, a teammate doesn't.
  2. What do you need back? The concrete decisions or facts the user can't resolve alone. This is the checklist the finished document is measured against: every item named gets a question aimed at it.

Do not interview the user about the subject. Not knowing the subject is the whole reason for writing to someone else.

The document — to-questionnaire-<slug>.md in the working directory

Framed as a discovery questionnaire (the user lacks the context, the recipient holds it):

  • Purpose line naming the decision riding on it, then a short context section for a recipient who was never in the user's head.
  • Questions ordered most-important-first, grouped under themed headings — async means one pass may be all you get.
  • One idea per question, never compound. An answer stub beneath each. A why this matters line only where a question could be misread.
  • Explicit permission to answer "I don't know" — a flagged uncertainty is useful, a confident guess that reads like a fact is not.
  • Closing catch-all: "anything we didn't ask that we should know?"

Not branching (flat grouped list, not a tree). Not multi-recipient — one run, one document, one person. If three people hold three parts, run it three times.

After

The answers come back as raw material — feed them into the next planning/grill round, or into planning/write-prd if the work is heading for a build.

Anti-patterns

  • ❌ Asking the user a question about the subject itself — the skill is off the rails.
  • ❌ Compound questions, or questions the recipient can't answer without the user's context.
  • ❌ Copying the user's open questions down verbatim instead of re-aiming them at what the recipient knows.
  • ❌ One document trying to serve several recipients.
  • ❌ Starting it in a fresh session with no grilling context to draw on.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.