to-questionnaire
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a decision you can't settle yourself into a Markdown questionnaire for the one person who holds the missing knowledge — a client, a domain expert, the exec who owns the business rules. Grills you only about the send (who it's going to, what you need back), never the subject, then drafts questions aimed at the gap. Use when a `grill` session stalls on something that isn't yours to answer, or the user says "send this to the client / to X", "I need answers from someone else".
129 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cormacc/dotagentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 5thlayer/skillworkstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dfirmin/compasstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, claude-handoff and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 34 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 34 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 35 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 35 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-fragments
Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.
Also in 35 projects that use this
simo97Skillmigrate-to-shoehorn
Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.
Also in 34 projects that use this
- +1 more from Lesani
Other versions129 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 129
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 667same name
- devcxl/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 522same name
- aws/graph-explorer★ 490same name
119 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository73 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bigquery-analyticsSkill
- cache-invalidationSkill
- mongo-aggregationSkill
- mongo-modelingSkill
- postgres-aggregationSkill
- postgres-indexingSkill
- redis-coordinationSkill
- redis-patternsSkill
- review-querySkill
- code-migrationSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- data-migrationSkill
- deploy-serviceSkill
- hotfixSkill
- rollbackSkill
- design-endpointSkill
- design-eventSkill
- design-schemaSkill
- evolve-contractSkill
- scaffold-nestjs-moduleSkill
- scaffold-projectSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- investigate-bugSkill
- on-callSkill
- postmortemSkill
- audit-skillsSkill
- distill-review-styleSkill
- write-skillSkill
- debug-with-tracesSkill
- define-alertsSkill
- instrument-serviceSkill
- evaluate-dependencySkill
- grillSkill
- handoffSkill
- orientSkill
- phased-deliverySkill
- spikeSkill
- write-adrSkill
- write-prdSkill
- devops-pr-reviewSkill
- go-backend-pr-reviewSkill
- nestjs-backend-pr-reviewSkill
- python-backend-pr-reviewSkill
- react-frontend-pr-reviewSkill
- bisectSkill
- break-couplingSkill
- dead-code-sweepSkill
- deslopifySkill
- extract-moduleSkill
- rebase-cleanSkill
- resolve-merge-conflictsSkill
- split-commitSkill
- tddSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wide-renameSkill
- bullmqSkill
- kafkaSkill
- sqs-consumerSkill
- audit-dependenciesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 121 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Run it in the same conversation as the grilling session that stalled — the open questions are already in context.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not interview the user about the subject.
- Distinctive: line 43
Not branching (flat grouped list, not a tree).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 121 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
To questionnaire
Adapted from mattpocock/skills to-questionnaire
(MIT). Companion to planning/grill: grilling mines the user's own head, this
mines someone else's.
Run it in the same conversation as the grilling session that stalled — the open questions are already in context. Started fresh, it knows nothing about the subject and the user has to re-supply it.
Interview — two questions, then stop
- Who is it going to? Role, expertise, relationship to the user. Fixes tone and how much context the document carries — an outside client needs orienting, a teammate doesn't.
- What do you need back? The concrete decisions or facts the user can't resolve alone. This is the checklist the finished document is measured against: every item named gets a question aimed at it.
Do not interview the user about the subject. Not knowing the subject is the whole reason for writing to someone else.
The document — to-questionnaire-<slug>.md in the working directory
Framed as a discovery questionnaire (the user lacks the context, the recipient holds it):
- Purpose line naming the decision riding on it, then a short context section for a recipient who was never in the user's head.
- Questions ordered most-important-first, grouped under themed headings — async means one pass may be all you get.
- One idea per question, never compound. An answer stub beneath each. A why this matters line only where a question could be misread.
- Explicit permission to answer "I don't know" — a flagged uncertainty is useful, a confident guess that reads like a fact is not.
- Closing catch-all: "anything we didn't ask that we should know?"
Not branching (flat grouped list, not a tree). Not multi-recipient — one run, one document, one person. If three people hold three parts, run it three times.
After
The answers come back as raw material — feed them into the next planning/grill
round, or into planning/write-prd if the work is heading for a build.
Anti-patterns
- ❌ Asking the user a question about the subject itself — the skill is off the rails.
- ❌ Compound questions, or questions the recipient can't answer without the user's context.
- ❌ Copying the user's open questions down verbatim instead of re-aiming them at what the recipient knows.
- ❌ One document trying to serve several recipients.
- ❌ Starting it in a fresh session with no grilling context to draw on.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

