geo-technical
Skill16 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Technical SEO audit with GEO-specific checks: crawlability, indexability, security, performance, SSR, and AI crawler access
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ormus-Solutions/LibreGEO-Claude-Codetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- HermeticOrmus/LibreGEO-Claude-Codetheir own version, first seen Oct 1, 2026
- zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claudetheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
- kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Mar 16, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude★ 11ksame name
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kit★ 2same name
- HermeticOrmus/LibreGEO-Claude-Code★ 1same name
- Ormus-Solutions/LibreGEO-Claude-Code★ 1same name
- kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-readiness-scanSkill
- found-by-aiSkill
- geo-auditSkill
- geo-brand-mentionsSkill
- geo-citabilitySkill
- geo-compareSkill
- geo-contentSkill
- geo-crawlersSkill
- geo-llmstxtSkill
- geo-platform-optimizerSkill
- geo-proposalSkill
- geo-prospectSkill
- geo-report-pdfSkill
- geo-reportSkill
- geo-schemaSkill
- geoSkill
The file
Files
GEO Technical SEO Audit
Purpose
Technical SEO is the foundation of both traditional search visibility and AI search citation. A technically broken site cannot be crawled, indexed, or cited by any platform. This skill audits eight categories of technical health with specific attention to GEO requirements, most critically server-side rendering (AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript) and AI crawler access (many sites inadvertently block AI crawlers in robots.txt).
How to Use This Skill
- Collect the target URL (homepage + 2-3 key inner pages).
- Fetch each page using curl/WebFetch to get raw HTML and HTTP headers.
- Work through each of the eight categories in
references/audit-categories.md, scoring each against its rubric there. (That file also covers the IndexNow check.) - Total the category scores into the 100-point composite below.
- Generate
GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.mdusingreferences/output-template.md.
The two GEO-critical categories, AI crawler access (Category 1.2) and server-side
rendering (Category 7), are where conventional SEO audits miss the most. A site can pass a
traditional audit and still be invisible to AI crawlers because its content is client-rendered or
GPTBot is disallowed. Always confirm these two by fetching raw HTML with curl (no JS execution).
Overall Scoring
| Category | Max Points | Weight |
| Crawlability | 15 | Core foundation |
| Indexability | 12 | Core foundation |
| Security | 10 | Trust signal |
| URL Structure | 8 | Crawl efficiency |
| Mobile Optimization | 10 | Google requirement |
| Core Web Vitals | 15 | Ranking signal |
| Server-Side Rendering | 15 | GEO critical |
| Page Speed & Server | 15 | Performance |
| Total | 100 |
Per-category point breakdowns live alongside each category's checks in
references/audit-categories.md.
Score Interpretation
- 90-100: Excellent. Technically sound for both traditional SEO and GEO
- 70-89: Good. Minor issues to address but fundamentally solid
- 50-69: Needs Work. Significant technical debt impacting visibility
- 30-49: Poor. Major issues blocking crawling, indexing, or AI visibility
- 0-29: Critical. Fundamental technical failures requiring immediate attention
Output
Provenance (THL): tag the score
[scan](data fetched this run),[partial-scan],[heuristic](judgement, no data), or[unmeasured], and emitn/ainstead of a number when[unmeasured]or pure[heuristic]. A number with weak provenance still reads as hard data. See the GEO Method.
Write GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.md using
references/output-template.md: technical score, per-category
breakdown with Pass/Warn/Fail status, the AI-crawler access table, then issues tiered as Critical
/ Warnings / Recommendations, each citing the specific page URL so the finding is verifiable.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

