agentleFS
techhorizonlabstechhorizonlabs/thl-open/skills/geo-technical/SKILL.md

geo-technical

Skill16 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Technical SEO audit with GEO-specific checks: crawlability, indexability, security, performance, SSR, and AI crawler access

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

GEO Technical SEO Audit

Purpose

Technical SEO is the foundation of both traditional search visibility and AI search citation. A technically broken site cannot be crawled, indexed, or cited by any platform. This skill audits eight categories of technical health with specific attention to GEO requirements, most critically server-side rendering (AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript) and AI crawler access (many sites inadvertently block AI crawlers in robots.txt).

How to Use This Skill

  1. Collect the target URL (homepage + 2-3 key inner pages).
  2. Fetch each page using curl/WebFetch to get raw HTML and HTTP headers.
  3. Work through each of the eight categories in references/audit-categories.md, scoring each against its rubric there. (That file also covers the IndexNow check.)
  4. Total the category scores into the 100-point composite below.
  5. Generate GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.md using references/output-template.md.

The two GEO-critical categories, AI crawler access (Category 1.2) and server-side rendering (Category 7), are where conventional SEO audits miss the most. A site can pass a traditional audit and still be invisible to AI crawlers because its content is client-rendered or GPTBot is disallowed. Always confirm these two by fetching raw HTML with curl (no JS execution).


Overall Scoring

CategoryMax PointsWeight
Crawlability15Core foundation
Indexability12Core foundation
Security10Trust signal
URL Structure8Crawl efficiency
Mobile Optimization10Google requirement
Core Web Vitals15Ranking signal
Server-Side Rendering15GEO critical
Page Speed & Server15Performance
Total100

Per-category point breakdowns live alongside each category's checks in references/audit-categories.md.

Score Interpretation

  • 90-100: Excellent. Technically sound for both traditional SEO and GEO
  • 70-89: Good. Minor issues to address but fundamentally solid
  • 50-69: Needs Work. Significant technical debt impacting visibility
  • 30-49: Poor. Major issues blocking crawling, indexing, or AI visibility
  • 0-29: Critical. Fundamental technical failures requiring immediate attention

Output

Provenance (THL): tag the score [scan] (data fetched this run), [partial-scan], [heuristic] (judgement, no data), or [unmeasured], and emit n/a instead of a number when [unmeasured] or pure [heuristic]. A number with weak provenance still reads as hard data. See the GEO Method.

Write GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.md using references/output-template.md: technical score, per-category breakdown with Pass/Warn/Fail status, the AI-crawler access table, then issues tiered as Critical / Warnings / Recommendations, each citing the specific page URL so the finding is verifiable.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.