agentleFS
techhorizonlabstechhorizonlabs/thl-open/skills/geo-llmstxt/SKILL.md

geo-llmstxt

Skill16 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Analyzes and generates llms.txt files -- the emerging standard for helping AI systems understand website structure and content. Can validate existing llms.txt files or generate new ones from scratch by crawling the site.

7 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use seo-local and seo-schema.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • mangollcSkill

    seo-local

    Local SEO optimization: Google Business Profile post generation, 30-day posting calendars, NAP consistency checks, local citation audits, review response templates, local keywords.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-schema

    Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", or "markup".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 2 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 2

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    [references/spec.md](references/spec.md): read it before validating or generating a file.

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Early-adopter advantage: only a small minority of sites have an llms.txt today, so it remains a differentiator.

    line 35
  3. Common:

    When checking an existing llms.txt file.

    line 41
  4. Very specific:

    Use WebFetch to retrieve [domain]/llms.txt.

    line 44
  5. Very specific:

    Check each structural element against the format rules in references/spec.md:

    line 48
  6. Common:

    When creating a new llms.txt from scratch.

    line 81
  7. Distinctive:

    Verify all URLs return 200.

    line 103
  8. Very specific:

    Use the templates in references/output-template.md:

    line 109

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

llms.txt Standard Analysis and Generation Skill

Purpose

This skill handles everything related to the llms.txt standard, an emerging convention (proposed by Jeremy Howard in September 2024) that lets a website give AI systems structured guidance about its content, structure, and key information. It is analogous to robots.txt (which tells crawlers what NOT to access) but instead tells AI systems what IS most useful to understand about the site.

The full format spec, the llms-full.txt variant, a fill-in template, and best practices live in references/spec.md: read it before validating or generating a file.

Why llms.txt Matters

AI models must work out which pages matter, what a site is about, and how content is organized, usually by crawling many pages and inferring structure. llms.txt solves this with an explicit, machine- and human-readable summary.

  1. Faster AI comprehension: understand the site's purpose and structure from one file rather than dozens of pages.
  2. Controlled narrative: you choose which pages and facts AI systems see first, shaping how they represent your brand.
  3. Higher citation accuracy: AI systems that consult llms.txt cite the correct, authoritative page for each topic.
  4. Reduced misrepresentation: key facts (pricing, features, locations) are stated explicitly, reducing hallucination.
  5. Early-adopter advantage: only a small minority of sites have an llms.txt today, so it remains a differentiator.

Analysis Mode

When checking an existing llms.txt file.

Step 1: Fetch the File

  1. Use WebFetch to retrieve [domain]/llms.txt. Also check [domain]/llms-full.txt.
  2. Record HTTP status: 200 → validate; 404 → recommend generation; 403 → file blocked, flag as misconfiguration; 301/302 → follow and note the redirect.

Step 2: Validate Format

Check each structural element against the format rules in references/spec.md:

ElementCheckSeverity if Missing
H1 TitlePresent, matches business nameCritical
Blockquote descriptionPresent, under 200 chars, factualHigh
At least one H2 sectionPresentCritical
Page entries with URLsAt least 5 entries presentHigh
URLs are absoluteAll URLs use full https:// pathsHigh
URLs are validAll URLs return 200 statusMedium
Descriptions presentEvery entry has a description after the colonMedium
Key Facts sectionPresent with business informationMedium
Contact sectionPresent with at least emailLow
Reasonable length30-200 linesLow
No broken MarkdownProper formatting throughoutMedium

Step 3: Assess Content Quality

Rate three dimensions 0-100:

  • Completeness: covers all major site sections? most important/highest-traffic pages? Key Facts present and accurate? recent content?
  • Accuracy: descriptions reflect page content? URLs valid and correct? Key Facts verifiable and current? business description accurate?
  • Usefulness: would an AI understand the site from this file alone? descriptions specific enough to differentiate pages? citation-worthy pages highlighted? logical organization?
Overall llms.txt Score = (Completeness * 0.40) + (Accuracy * 0.35) + (Usefulness * 0.25)

Step 4: Compare Against Site Content

Crawl the main navigation and sitemap; identify important pages NOT listed; flag broken/redirected URLs, a business description that no longer matches the homepage, and stale entries (pages significantly updated since the llms.txt was written).


Generation Mode

When creating a new llms.txt from scratch.

Step 1: Site Discovery

Fetch the homepage and extract the site name (<title>, og:site_name, or H1), business description (meta description or hero), and main navigation + footer links. Fetch /sitemap.xml for all public pages. Identify the business type (SaaS, E-commerce, Local, Publisher, Agency).

Step 2: Page Prioritization

  • Always include: homepage, About, pricing (if any), top 3-5 product/service pages, contact, docs landing.
  • Include if high quality: top blog posts, case studies, key guides, FAQ, careers (large companies).
  • Skip: thin category/tag pages, pagination, login/signup, legal boilerplate (unless relevant), duplicates, minimal-content pages.

Step 3: Write Descriptions

For each selected page, fetch it and read the H1, meta description, and first 2-3 paragraphs, then write a 10-30 word description that states what information is on the page and the specific topics/data/features covered. Use factual language; avoid "best/leading/revolutionary."

  • Good: Explains the three pricing tiers (Free, Pro, Enterprise) with feature comparison and annual/monthly costs.
  • Bad: Our amazing pricing page! / Learn more about our company.

Step 4: Compile Key Facts

Gather: year founded, founder(s), HQ, employee count (if public), customer/user count (if public), top 3-5 products/services, industry, notable clients/partnerships (if public), key differentiators, recent milestones (last 12 months).

Step 5: Assemble the File

Build the file from the template in references/spec.md.

Step 6: Validate the Generated File

Verify all URLs return 200; entry count is 10-30; no description exceeds 50 words; total length is 50-150 lines; Markdown is clean and consistent.


Output

Use the templates in references/output-template.md:

  • Analysis mode: GEO-LLMSTXT-ANALYSIS.md: score, format-validation table, missing pages, recommendations, and a suggested rewrite if needed.
  • Generation mode: the complete llms.txt, plus a short GEO-LLMSTXT-GENERATION.md noting pages discovered vs. selected, prioritization rationale, borderline pages, and recommended update frequency.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.