ship-macos
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Release a macOS app through Developer ID or TestFlight with explicit credential gates, artifact verification, release provenance, and rollback information.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- apple-native-motionSkill
- apple-ui-copySkill
- audit-macos-appSkill
- brain-wikiSkill
- catch-me-upSkill
- checkpointSkill
- claude-md-coachSkill
- claudeSkill
- codexSkill
- crash-debuggingSkill
- cut-memorySkill
- explaining-problemsSkill
- file-batch-safetySkill
- handoffSkill
- heads-downSkill
- hopper-mcpSkill
- icon-designSkill
- interface-integritySkill
- ios-defaultsSkill
- kitSkill
- macos-defaultsSkill
- mock-and-pickSkill
- obsess-heroSkill
- obsessSkill
- offline-archiveSkill
- os-workaroundsSkill
- paper-mcpSkill
- predictionSkill
- second-loopSkill
- session-auditSkill
- show-meSkill
- slice-and-reviewSkill
- slow-modeSkill
- spatial-interfacesSkill
- standupSkill
- synthetic-fixturesSkill
- transitional-interfacesSkill
- web-design-defaultsSkill
- window-captureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Read references/distribution.md for channel mechanics, then verify command syntax against the installed Xcode tools and current Apple …
- Distinctive: line 16
Before distribution, write or update a project-local release record containing:
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not place secrets, profile contents, or private keys in the record.
- Distinctive: line 33
verify notarization/Gatekeeper status for Developer ID distribution.
- Distinctive: line 38
If notarization fails, fetch and inspect the notary log before changing signing settings.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ship macOS
Gates
Confirm the intended channel, version, supported architectures, and destination. Never invent a bundle ID. Before touching signing identities, keychains, provisioning profiles, notarization credentials, App Store Connect, or an upload, confirm that the requested release authorizes that exact step.
Read references/distribution.md for channel mechanics, then verify command syntax against the installed Xcode tools and current Apple documentation. Those details are volatile.
Release record
Before distribution, write or update a project-local release record containing:
- source commit and dirty-state result;
- marketing version, build number, bundle ID, and architectures;
- Xcode/SDK version and release scheme;
- entitlements and signing identity/team;
- artifact names plus SHA-256 hashes;
- notarization submission ID or TestFlight build link/status;
- smoke-test results, known limitations, and the prior releasable artifact or rollback route.
Do not place secrets, profile contents, or private keys in the record.
Verify the artifact people receive
Verification happens on the packaged output, not only the archive:
- confirm signature, entitlements, architectures, version, and bundle ID;
- verify notarization/Gatekeeper status for Developer ID distribution;
- mount or install through the real delivery container;
- launch and exercise the shortest critical flow on a clean-enough account or machine;
- preserve the exact artifact and hash referenced by the release record.
If notarization fails, fetch and inspect the notary log before changing signing settings. Do not weaken hardened runtime or entitlements merely to make a submission pass.
Uploading or publishing leaves the machine and requires explicit scope. A locally verified artifact is not a shipped release; report the last completed gate precisely.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

