catch-me-up
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Rebuild and report where a project stands from live state, not memory. Use when the user says "catch me up", "where were we", "where are we", "recap", "summarize the compaction", "read back the compaction notes", is coming back after days or weeks away, or asks for state right after a compaction or resume. Not for a status sweep across many projects (use standup), and not for writing a handoff note for another session.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- khgouldy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- migavel508/wisprnote-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- palmeheskd/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- RisorseArtificiali/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 6, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- RisorseArtificiali/skills★ 13same name
- khgouldy/skills★ 1same name
- migavel508/wisprnote-skills★ 0same name
- palmeheskd/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- apple-native-motionSkill
- apple-ui-copySkill
- audit-macos-appSkill
- brain-wikiSkill
- checkpointSkill
- claude-md-coachSkill
- claudeSkill
- codexSkill
- crash-debuggingSkill
- cut-memorySkill
- explaining-problemsSkill
- file-batch-safetySkill
- handoffSkill
- heads-downSkill
- hopper-mcpSkill
- icon-designSkill
- interface-integritySkill
- ios-defaultsSkill
- kitSkill
- macos-defaultsSkill
- mock-and-pickSkill
- obsess-heroSkill
- obsessSkill
- offline-archiveSkill
- os-workaroundsSkill
- paper-mcpSkill
- predictionSkill
- second-loopSkill
- session-auditSkill
- ship-macosSkill
- show-meSkill
- slice-and-reviewSkill
- slow-modeSkill
- spatial-interfacesSkill
- standupSkill
- synthetic-fixturesSkill
- transitional-interfacesSkill
- web-design-defaultsSkill
- window-captureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Do these in parallel. Skip what doesn't exist.
- Distinctive: line 21
Stop there. This is a few commands, not an audit.
- Distinctive: line 42
If the user says they've been away for weeks, or the last commit or checkpoint is weeks old, also:
- Very specific: line 45
If it's an app, build and open it so they can see where it is (make run for Xcode projects, the project's dev command otherwise).
- Distinctive: line 49
If the work continues and there is a checkpoint file, update it to match what you just found, so the next recap starts from the truth.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Catch me up
The user asks this a lot, often right after a compaction. The usual failure is a recap that is a session behind: another session moved the work, or this one did after the summary was written. So the summary is a starting point, not the answer. Check what is true now, then say it short.
1. Re-read live state (cheap, read-only)
Do these in parallel. Skip what doesn't exist. Don't fix or clean anything yet.
- The compaction summary, if there is one.
- Checkpoint files:
checkpoints/at the project root (the checkpoint skill's folder; also a legacy.checkpoints/if present), plusCOMPACTED.md,RESUME.md,HANDOFF.md, orCHECKPOINT.mdat the root. - Git:
git status --short,git log --oneline -15with dates,git branch -vv,git stash list,git worktree list. - Files changed recently:
find . -newer <last commit or checkpoint> -type f -not -path './.git/*'or similar, capped to a short list.
Assume other sessions may have worked here. When the summary or a checkpoint disagrees with git or the files, the files win. Say so in one line ("notes said X, repo shows Y").
Stop there. This is a few commands, not an audit.
2. Reply
First line: where we are, in one sentence. Then a short numbered list:
- Where we are — the phase and what's working now.
- In flight — uncommitted changes, open branches, running or half-done work.
- Changed since last time — commits or edits newer than the summary or checkpoint, including ones from other sessions.
- Next step — one concrete thing, small enough to start now.
- Needs you — decisions or approvals only the user can give. Leave out if none.
Rules:
- Plain words. No commit hashes, task IDs, or internal labels unless you explain what they are.
- Length matches the ask. "Quick recap" is a few lines. "Long recap" or "full recap" can cover decisions, discards, and open questions.
- Skip empty items. Don't invent momentum or a next step the evidence doesn't support; "no recorded next step" is fine.
- Full absolute paths for any file you name.
3. Back after a long gap
If the user says they've been away for weeks, or the last commit or checkpoint is weeks old, also:
- List lingering branches, stashes, worktrees, and uncommitted work, each with a one-line guess at what it was. Don't delete or merge any of it.
- If it's an app, build and open it so they can see where it is (
make runfor Xcode projects, the project's dev command otherwise). Say if the build fails; that's part of the state.
After the recap
If the work continues and there is a checkpoint file, update it to match what you just found, so the next recap starts from the truth.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

