mock-and-pick
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
The a/b/c static-mock workflow for UI or copy changes with no stated direction. Use before editing real components on taste.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- apple-native-motionSkill
- apple-ui-copySkill
- audit-macos-appSkill
- brain-wikiSkill
- catch-me-upSkill
- checkpointSkill
- claude-md-coachSkill
- claudeSkill
- codexSkill
- crash-debuggingSkill
- cut-memorySkill
- explaining-problemsSkill
- file-batch-safetySkill
- handoffSkill
- heads-downSkill
- hopper-mcpSkill
- icon-designSkill
- interface-integritySkill
- ios-defaultsSkill
- kitSkill
- macos-defaultsSkill
- obsess-heroSkill
- obsessSkill
- offline-archiveSkill
- os-workaroundsSkill
- paper-mcpSkill
- predictionSkill
- second-loopSkill
- session-auditSkill
- ship-macosSkill
- show-meSkill
- slice-and-reviewSkill
- slow-modeSkill
- spatial-interfacesSkill
- standupSkill
- synthetic-fixturesSkill
- transitional-interfacesSkill
- web-design-defaultsSkill
- window-captureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Isolated only: Use a self-contained HTML file, SwiftUI preview, rendered image, or tiny motion prototype.
- Distinctive: line 35
If they pick nothing and redirects, that redirect is the new direction.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
mock-and-pick
When the user hands you a direction (a mock, tokens, reference shots, a described look), build exactly that. This skill is for the other case: a non-trivial UI, layout, or copy change with NO direction yet. Don't edit real components on your own taste. Mock first, let them pick.
When it applies
- Non-trivial visual or copy changes without a stated direction.
- It does NOT apply to trivial changes (a spacing fix, a typo, an obvious bug). Just do those.
- It does NOT apply when direction exists. Design intent is law; mocks would second-guess them.
Making the mocks
- 2 to 4 mocks, distinct directions, not variations. Each mock is a different bet, not the same bet in three fonts. If you can't articulate what each one bets on, you have variations, and you should collapse them.
- Isolated only. Use a self-contained HTML file, SwiftUI preview, rendered image, or tiny motion prototype. Never edit real components before a direction is chosen. Keep mocks in
mocks/while the decision is active. - Label A, B, C and give each one line of rationale: "A bets on density. B bets on calm. C bets on the sidebar doing the work."
- Copy changes: mock as before/after text blocks, same labels.
- Motion: static mocks lie about how motion feels. Describe the choreography in a line each, and when the decision IS the motion, build tiny isolated runnable prototypes instead of stills. For native prototypes, use
apple-native-motion. - Match each mock's fidelity to the decision. Picking a layout needs boxes; picking a type treatment needs real type.
Showing them
- Web: render the HTML inline or send the file so the user sees it immediately.
- Native: build the preview and capture it with the
window-captureskill. - Show all options in one message, side by side where possible. Then STOP. No implementing, no "meanwhile I went ahead".
After the pick
- Picks compose. "C plus A's header" is a normal answer; build the composite.
- Implement exactly what was picked. Preserve the chosen direction and the constraints learned from rejected options. Losing mock artifacts can be deleted or archived after the winner ships; do not make speculative comps permanent project inventory by default.
- If they pick nothing and redirects, that redirect is the new direction. Follow it, don't defend the mocks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

