agentleFS
sxntixgosxntixgo/frugal-skills/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

brainstorming

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turns a vague idea into a validated design through dialogue — clarifies intent one question at a time, explores 2-3 approaches with trade-offs, and validates the design in sections before implementation. Use before building a feature, component, or system when the requirements or approach aren't nailed down yet.

190 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +6 more from ryanportfolio

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write implementation code or a task breakdown → hand off to writing-plans (to phase it) and software-development (to build it).

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    Add features nobody asked for → keep the design minimal (YAGNI).

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Read the current project state (files, docs, recent commits) before asking anything.

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask ONE question per turn (multiple-choice when you can — it's easier to answer).

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md.

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brainstorming

Design before building. Draw the requirements out of the user through dialogue, explore alternatives, and validate the design incrementally — don't jump to a solution or start coding.

Scope

This skill DOES:

  • Understand the idea, clarify intent one question at a time, explore approaches with trade-offs, and validate the design in small sections.

This skill does NOT:

  • Write implementation code or a task breakdown → hand off to writing-plans (to phase it) and software-development (to build it).
  • Barrel ahead once it knows "enough" without validating with the user.
  • Add features nobody asked for → keep the design minimal (YAGNI).

Steps

Surface these as TodoWrite items. Checkpoint the work-in-progress design to ./.claude-skills-work/brainstorming/<topic>/design.md so a long session resumes; the final validated design is written to docs/plans/ in step 5.

1. Understand the context

Read the current project state (files, docs, recent commits) before asking anything. Restate the idea in your own words so the user can correct you.

2. Clarify intent — one question at a time ⛔

Ask ONE question per turn (multiple-choice when you can — it's easier to answer). Cover purpose, constraints, success criteria, and scope. Keep going until you can state plainly what's being built and what "done/good" means. Prefer stop-and-ask over assuming. See references/questioning.md.

3. Explore approaches

Propose 2–3 distinct approaches with concrete trade-offs. Lead with your recommendation and why; let the user choose. Don't present a single option as if it's the only one.

4. Present the design in sections

Present the design in small sections (~200–300 words each): architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing. After each, ask "does this look right?" and adjust before continuing. Go back if something doesn't fit.

5. Write it down and hand off

Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md. Point the user to writing-plans to turn it into a phased implementation plan.

Red flags (stop and correct)

If you notice…Do this
Asking several questions at onceOne question per turn
Jumping to a design/solution before intent is clearClarify intent first (step 2)
Dumping a whole design wallPresent in sections; validate each
Offering only one optionPropose 2–3 approaches with trade-offs
Starting to write implementation codeStop — design here; software-development builds
Designing for hypothetical futuresKeep it minimal (YAGNI); design the real need
Accepting a vague "make it good"Pin down concrete success criteria

Done when

  • You can state what's being built, its constraints, and its success criteria.
  • The user chose among explored alternatives, and the design was validated section by section.
  • The design is written to docs/plans/ and handed off to writing-plans.

References (load only when needed)

  • references/questioning.md — asking good one-at-a-time questions (multiple-choice vs open, when to stop) and framing approach trade-offs.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.