content-calendar
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Produces 30 days of content mapped to message pillars and buying-journey stages, platform by platform, with repurposing chains planned and week-one hooks pre-written. Use when posting is sporadic, ideas run out by Tuesday, or content volume is high but pipeline impact is invisible.
27 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oivanfelipe/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- clements23/marketing-agency-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- saypage-ai/saypage-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- epicx-labs/keytomic-claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- try-era/geo-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- postoncehq/postonce-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use campaign-brief, x-writer and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
DanderlionJerSkillcampaign-brief
Generate comprehensive campaign brief from strategy notes and goals
Also in 3 projects that use this
stevenflanagan1Skillx-writer
X/Twitter Content Specialist. Writes X-native posts — hooks, threads, and standalone tweets optimised for the platform. Strictly enforces the 280 character limit with a count on every post. Supports standalone tweets and X threads (1/ format). Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Optional X trend research via Tasty Content MCP. Output to outputs/x/.
Also in 3 projects that use this
stevenflanagan1Skilllinkedin-writer
LinkedIn Content Specialist. Writes LinkedIn-native posts for SMB clients — first-person, professional-but-human, built for LinkedIn's format and algorithm. Not adapted captions: posts written from first principles for the platform. Reads brand-style.md and content-calendar.md. Flags posts that would benefit from a Blotato infographic. Output to outputs/linkedin/.
Also in 3 projects that use this
akhilkannurSkillcontent-repurposer
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillseo-audit
Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 27
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills★ 731same name
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
- Ootto-AI/claude-content-skills★ 417same name
- stevenflanagan1/social-ai-team★ 216same name
- marcosmodly/marketing-skill★ 100same name
- gokulsvision/Crewm8-Social-Media-Manager-Skill-Graph★ 17same name
- oswarld/notion-skills★ 11same name
- calven-ai/marketing-as-code★ 10same name
- aiimpactagency/social-media-team★ 3same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-scriptsSkill
- battlecardSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- campaign-debriefSkill
- case-study-writerSkill
- channel-pickerSkill
- cmoSkill
- competitor-teardownSkill
- creative-briefSkill
- customer-deep-diveSkill
- email-sequenceSkill
- experiment-backlogSkill
- funnel-mapSkill
- hook-factorySkill
- kpi-treeSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- launch-planSkill
- lead-magnet-builderSkill
- marketing-auditSkill
- market-research-sprintSkill
- message-mapSkill
- objection-mapSkill
- offer-builderSkill
- onboardSkill
- positioning-workshopSkill
- pricing-testSkill
- repurposeSkill
- research-to-briefSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Check the foundations. No message pillars in the brief?
- Distinctive: line 31
Every piece ladders to a pillar or it does not get a slot.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Calendar — 30 days that ladder to something
A calendar full of "post something Tuesday" is a chore list, not a strategy. This calendar gives every piece three jobs before it earns a slot — a pillar it argues, a journey stage it serves, a next step it points to — and pre-writes the week-one hooks so the plan survives contact with Monday.
Inputs
- Platforms in play and honest posting capacity per week: $ARGUMENTS
- From
marketing-brief.mdif present: the message pillars (every piece ladders to one), the customer journey and top pains, the primary channel, voice rules, and the banned-phrases list.
Do this
- Check the foundations. No message pillars in the brief? Run
/marketing:message-mapfirst — a calendar without pillars is a posting schedule, and posting schedules produce noise on a cadence. - Set the weekly mix against where the funnel currently needs help, varying format to each platform's native shapes:
- Problem and pain pieces — earn attention at the top of the journey.
- Mechanism and proof pieces — build belief in the middle.
- Offer and CTA pieces — convert at the bottom, in proportion to the trust built.
- Generate the idea bank: roughly ten cornerstone ideas, each drawn from a pillar crossed with a pain, desire, or objection in the brief. Inside Claude Code, the content-strategist agent can run this pass.
- Plan the repurposing chains before filling the grid: each cornerstone spawns derivatives — a long post becomes a carousel outline, three short takes, and an email. Thirty days of content should need about ten ideas, not thirty.
- Build the 30-day grid: date, platform, pillar, journey stage, format, working title or angle, CTA. One idea per piece. Leave roughly one slot in five unassigned for reactive content — a calendar with no slack gets abandoned by week two.
- Pre-write the week-one hooks — the first line of every week-one piece, structure-first (
/marketing:hook-factorydoes this properly). Whether week one ships is what decides whether the calendar lives. - Set the weekly review: which pieces earned attention and moved pipeline, what gets doubled, what gets killed. Save the whole thing as
content-calendar.mdin the project root.
Output
The 30-day calendar grid, the repurposing chains, and the week-one hooks written out — saved to content-calendar.md. Flag any slot that could not be tied to a pillar; those are the first candidates to cut.
Rules
- Every piece ladders to a pillar or it does not get a slot. Volume without message is noise with production costs.
- One idea per piece. A post carrying three points makes none of them.
- CTAs match the journey stage. Asking cold readers to book a call is how content "fails" while doing its job perfectly.
- A derivative is reshaped for its platform, never pasted across three.
- Capacity honesty beats ambition. A three-post week that ships beats a seven-post week that collapses by week two.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

