plan
Skill14 starsChanged 36 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Turn a local working spec into a step-by-step implementation plan. Each step names the owning surface and specialist agent and the surface test command; the plan is written into .apex/work/plans/ as a gitignored work artifact.
184 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use heartmula, webhook-subscriptions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
math-incSkillheartmula
Set up and run HeartMuLa, the open-source music generation model family (Suno-like). Generates full songs from lyrics + tags with multilingual support.
Also in 9 projects that use this
Tommy-ywSkillwebhook-subscriptions
Create and manage webhook subscriptions for event-driven agent activation, or for direct push notifications (zero LLM cost). Use when the user wants external services to trigger agent runs OR push notifications to chats.
Also in 5 projects that use this
math-incSkillminecraft-modpack-server
Set up a modded Minecraft server from a CurseForge/Modrinth server pack zip. Covers NeoForge/Forge install, Java version, JVM tuning, firewall, LAN config, backups, and launch scripts.
Also in 5 projects that use this
john-data-chenSkilltouchdesigner-mcp
Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.
Also in 6 projects that use this
gaebalaiSkillcodex-system
PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".
Also in 3 projects that use this
ibahgatSkillcontext-optimize
Improve context efficiency and cache stability for long or complex sessions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from math-inc
Other versions184 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 184
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex★ 34ksame name
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
- graphistry/pygraphistry★ 2.6ksame name
- zereight/gitlab-mcp★ 2.1ksame name
- math-inc/OpenGauss★ 1.3ksame name
- kdlbs/kandev★ 1.1ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- witnesstodark/mr-mak-workspace★ 718same name
- loongclaw-ai/loongclaw★ 640same name
174 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- steepy-apex-bootstrapSkill
- steepy-apex-bootstrapSkill
- brainstormSkill
- checkSkill
- discoverySkill
- implementSkill
- inceptionSkill
- initSkill
- loop-engineerSkill
- new-surfaceSkill
- reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Write the plan into .apex/work/plans/.
- Very specific: line 39
Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run.
- Very specific: line 46
Always set model: explicitly when dispatching a subagent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
plan
Turn an approved spec into an implementation plan whose every task states the change it makes, not the goal it chases, with review checkpoints.
Engine root: this skill's base directory is
<engine-root>/skills/plan/; engine scripts live two levels up, at<engine-root>/scripts/. Resolve them relative to the base directory your harness reports for this skill.
Checklist
- In autopilot, read the supplied phase manifest first; then read the gear and scale ceremony to it (Step 0).
- Load the spec and the hub (routing table + owning surface standard); in autopilot, match and record every implicated modular leaf (Step 1).
- Map files and tasks.
- Bind each task to the hub (surface, specialist agent, test command, complexity).
- Write the plan into
.apex/work/plans/. 4.5. Self-review the plan inline — free gate, gear 2 and 3 (Step 4.5). - Validate with
validate-hub.mjs(deterministic gate). - Human review gate — ask the user to review the written plan before handoff (gear 3).
- Hand off to the
implementskill.
Procedure
The steps live in co-located files, each read in full at the point named here:
| Steps | File | Read it |
| Handoff envelope, resume pairs, publication order | manual-handoff.md | before accepting any input, and again before Step 6 publishes |
| 0–1: read the gear, load the spec and the hub | entry.md | at the start of every run, fresh or resumed |
| 2–4.5: map files and tasks, bind them to the hub, write the plan, self-review it | tasks.md | before mapping the first task |
| 5–7: validate, human review gate and lifecycle, hand off | finish.md | after the self-review passes |
Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run; a context compaction can drop the step files you read earlier. Before you act on a step, its file must be fully in view. If it is not — after a compaction, on resume, or when only a summary of it remains — re-read it from this skill's base directory first. Never act on a summary of a step file.
Model Selection
Always set model: explicitly when dispatching a subagent. An omitted model inherits the session model (usually the most capable and most expensive) and silently defeats this policy.
Pick the tier by task complexity and risk:
| Signal | Tier |
| Mechanical / transcription (1-2 files, complete spec) | cheap |
| Integration / multi-file / judgment | standard |
| Design / architecture / high-risk or subtle change | most-capable |
Reviewers floor at standard and rise to most-capable when the artifact is high-risk or subtle.
Turn count beats token price. The cheapest model often takes 2-3× the turns on multi-step work — more wall-clock and context overall. Make a mid-tier model the floor for reviewers and for implementers working from prose; reserve the cheapest tier for transcription tasks whose exact code the plan already contains.
Translate the tier to a concrete model by judgment at dispatch time using your harness's available models. The three tiers are the whole ladder — most-capable is its top rung, not an open-ended "best available". A model that sits above that rung is outside the ladder: never reach it from a tier, and record a one-line reason in the ledger when you override to it. On a harness without per-dispatch model choice, everything runs on the session model — record that in the ledger.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

