agentleFS
steepy-itsteepy-it/steepy-apex/skills/init/SKILL.md

init

Skill14 starsChanged 36 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Scaffold or repair a governed .apex hub and portable project instructions from one confirmed project model.

137 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LambenthanSkill

    daily-arxiv

    每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LambenthanSkill

    exp-eval

    实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-eval

    Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-run

    Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • gaebalaiSkill

    codex-system

    PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +6 more from Lambenthan
  • +1 more from skyllwt

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 125 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run.

    line 84

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 125 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

init

Build or repair a complete .apex/ governance hub without losing confirmed project data or overwriting user-owned content.

Engine root: this skill's base directory is <engine-root>/skills/init/; engine scripts live two levels up, at <engine-root>/scripts/. Resolve them relative to the base directory your harness reports for this skill.

Workflow contract

The interview produces one immutable, authoritative confirmed interview record. It retains every confirmed value used later by the planner or hub renderer, so no confirmed input lives only in transient chat state. Both fresh init and repair use that record and the same planner workflow. The planner owns generated provenance and update mechanics; this skill does not copy its marker strings or reproduce its merge logic.

Authoritative confirmed interview record

{
  "projectName": "project-slug",
  "description": "confirmed description or empty string",
  "devCommands": ["npm test"],
  "surfaces": [
    {
      "name": "web",
      "path": "apps/web",
      "agent": "web-agent",
      "testCmd": "npm test"
    }
  ],
  "domainVocabulary": {
    "hasSpecializedVocabulary": true,
    "entries": [
      { "term": "confirmed term", "definition": "confirmed definition" }
    ]
  },
  "gitPolicyDirective": "4. **Git policy:** confirmed policy text"
}

Exact planner projection

Derive this planner projection from the authoritative confirmed interview record:

{
  "projectName": "project-slug",
  "description": "confirmed description or empty string",
  "devCommands": ["npm test"],
  "surfaces": [
    {
      "name": "web",
      "path": "apps/web",
      "agent": "web-agent",
      "testCmd": "npm test"
    }
  ],
  "resolutions": {}
}

The planner CLI input is Project model v1 and has exactly those five top-level keys; never add domainVocabulary, gitPolicyDirective, or any other unsupported key because unknown keys are rejected. The projection is derived data, not a second source of truth. Hub documents use the authoritative record directly for values outside Project model v1.

Procedure

The steps live in co-located files, each read in full at the point named here:

StepsFileRead it
0–2: choose fresh init or repair, detect and confirm the model, serialize the recordentry.mdat the start of every run, fresh init or repair
3: preview, resolve exact conflicts, apply, certification and its recoveryapply.mdafter the record is serialized, before the first preview
4–5: complete the governed hub, validate and reportfinish.mdafter the planner apply succeeds, or before an explicit certification replay

Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run; a context compaction can drop the step files you read earlier. Before you act on a step, its file must be fully in view. If it is not — after a compaction, on resume, or when only a summary of it remains — re-read it from this skill's base directory first. Never act on a summary of a step file.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.