implement
Skill14 starsChanged 36 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Execute a READY Gear-2 spec directly or a hub-governed plan under TDD, scaling code-diff review and downstream handoff to the recorded gear.
191 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 50 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 88 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 168 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- steepy-it/steepy-formula★ 513% same
Wrote their own version · 190
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- steepy-apex-bootstrapSkill
- steepy-apex-bootstrapSkill
- brainstormSkill
- checkSkill
- discoverySkill
- inceptionSkill
- initSkill
- loop-engineerSkill
- new-surfaceSkill
- planSkill
- reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 49
If round 3's re-review still finds issues, move the fix up one tier from the tier round 3 ran at (standard → most-capable), add escalated: …
- Very specific: line 60
Only the user restarts a parked loop.
- Distinctive: line 65
Never raise the cap or restart the count on your own.
- Very specific: line 78
Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run.
- Very specific: line 85
Always set model: explicitly when dispatching a subagent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
implement
Execute either a READY Gear-2 spec directly or an approved plan one task at a time. You
orchestrate; the bound <surface>-agent implements under rigid TDD. Gear 2 uses implementer
self-review plus deterministic gates and terminates here. Gear 3 additionally spends code-diff
reviewers and hands the result to the review phase.
Engine root: this skill's base directory is
<engine-root>/skills/implement/; engine scripts live two levels up, at<engine-root>/scripts/. Resolve them relative to the base directory your harness reports for this skill.
Execution discipline
Keep between-task updates brief: which task finished and what comes next (e.g. "Task 2 approved, moving to Task 3") — the ledger and the tool results carry the record. Never ask "should I continue?" between tasks; execute the accepted input straight through. The only reasons to stop mid-run are an unresolved BLOCKED status, a genuine NEEDS_CONTEXT question from an implementer, a direct Gear-2 spec that requires decomposition, a fix loop parked by the fix-round cap, or all tasks complete.
Checklist
- Autopilot (
drive: autopilot): read the co-locatedautopilot-protocol.mdand take verdict/gear/drive from its contract (Step 0) - Manual/no-manifest: accept either the direct Gear-2 exact spec or the plan-backed exact plan + source-spec capabilities; never merge the alternatives (Steps 0–1)
- Derive the task directory,
ledger.md, and task-result index solely from the accepted entry artifact basename; resume only with exactprogress-ledger+task-resultscapabilities - Ask once: confirm the working branch (if on
main/master) and commit-after-each-task authorization — or read both from the autopilot contract (Step 2) - Verify the Gear-3 task-result handoff parses before claiming completion; close Gear 2 locally after its deterministic gates (Step 5)
- Pre-flight: scan the accepted spec or plan once for internal conflicts, batching only plan-backed conflicts to the user (Step 2.5)
- Per task (sequential): brief → dispatch
<surface>-agent(implementer-prompt.md) → diff → review (task-reviewer-prompt.md, gear 3 + non-mechanical only) → fix loop → mark complete - After the last task: whole-branch review (
final-review-prompt.md, gear 3 only) → fix loop - Gear 3 only: hand off to the
reviewskill with only criteria + task-results + branch-diff
Fix-round cap
A review-fix loop that stops converging is not healthy work, so it has a cap. The cap applies on its own to each task's loop (Step 3) and to the whole-branch loop (Step 4), inline same-session review passes included.
- A fix round is one fix dispatch plus its re-review. Before each fix dispatch, append
Task N: fix round <R> (model: <tier>)— orFinal review: fix round <R> (model: <tier>)— to the ledger. Count rounds from those ledger lines, never from memory. A fix that returns NEEDS_CONTEXT or BLOCKED and is dispatched again (more context, a stronger model, or autopilot's--role retry) stays in the same round; anescalated:note on the task's own ledger line is that BLOCKED handling, not a step of the cap. - Rounds 1–3 run the fix at the task's tier, never below
standard: a fix works from the issues prose (Model Selection). For the whole-branch loop, use the tier of the owning task the fix is dispatched under. - If round 3's re-review still finds issues, move the fix up one tier from the tier round 3 ran at
(standard → most-capable), add
escalated: <from>→<to>to the round-4 line, and allow rounds 4–5 there. - Park the loop when round 5's re-review still finds issues, or after round 3 when no higher tier
is left (the fix already runs at
most-capable, or the harness offers no per-dispatch model). AppendTask N: fix loop parked by the fix-round cap— orFinal review: fix loop parked by the fix-round cap— to the ledger, ending it with(attempt <A>)in autopilot. Manual drive: stop and give the user the open issues artifact (task-N-issues.mdorfinal-review-issues.md) with the ledger's round lines. Autopilot (drive: autopilot): append the correlatedBLOCKEDmarker fromautopilot-protocol.mdwith the reasonfix-round cap: Task N(orfix-round cap: final review) and exit non-zero. - Only the user restarts a parked loop. Record their decision as
Task N: fix loop restarted by user (<reason>)— orFinal review: fix loop restarted by user (<reason>)— and count rounds after the latest such line. In autopilot the user restarts by resuming the run: when a new attempt finds the loop still parked — its latest parked line comes from an earlier attempt and no restart line follows it — record the restart with the reasonautopilot resume, attempt <A>. Never raise the cap or restart the count on your own.
Procedure
The steps live in co-located files, each read in full at the point named here:
| Steps | File | Read it |
| Handoff envelope, resume pairs, publication order | manual-handoff.md | before accepting any input, and again before Step 5 publishes |
| 0–2.5: read the gear, load the input, confirm branch and commits, pre-flight scan | entry.md | at the start of every run, fresh or resumed |
| 3–4: per-task loop, child protocol, whole-branch review | task-loop.md | before dispatching the first task |
| 5: hand off | finish.md | after the last task, before the closing gates |
Only this SKILL.md is meant to stay in context for the whole run; a context compaction can drop the step files you read earlier. Before you act on a step, its file must be fully in view. If it is not — after a compaction, on resume, or when only a summary of it remains — re-read it from this skill's base directory first. Never act on a summary of a step file.
Model Selection
Always set model: explicitly when dispatching a subagent. An omitted model inherits the session model (usually the most capable and most expensive) and silently defeats this policy.
Pick the tier by task complexity and risk:
| Signal | Tier |
| Mechanical / transcription (1-2 files, complete spec) | cheap |
| Integration / multi-file / judgment | standard |
| Design / architecture / high-risk or subtle change | most-capable |
Reviewers floor at standard and rise to most-capable when the artifact is high-risk or subtle.
Turn count beats token price. The cheapest model often takes 2-3× the turns on multi-step work — more wall-clock and context overall. Make a mid-tier model the floor for reviewers and for implementers working from prose; reserve the cheapest tier for transcription tasks whose exact code the plan already contains.
Translate the tier to a concrete model by judgment at dispatch time using your harness's available models. The three tiers are the whole ladder — most-capable is its top rung, not an open-ended "best available". A model that sits above that rung is outside the ladder: never reach it from a tier, and record a one-line reason in the ledger when you override to it. The whole-branch review runs at the reviewer tier — standard, rising to most-capable when the branch is large or subtle — not at whatever model the harness happens to offer. On a harness without per-dispatch model choice, everything runs on the session model — record that in the ledger.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

