prototype
Skill1 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build runnable, disposable UI prototypes for web, mobile, or desktop. Use to answer a design question by trying one concept or comparing meaningfully different layouts or interactions before production implementation.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gaoyu06/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Firzus/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, soak-test and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 12 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 14 projects that use this
- +5 more from lilangMax
- +3 more from CoralGame
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- emilkowalski/skill★ 55ksame name
- emilkowalski/skills★ 55ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- spree/spree★ 16ksame name
- usekaneo/kaneo★ 9.7ksame name
- podman-desktop/podman-desktop★ 8.1ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-loginSkill
- animateSkill
- app-intentsSkill
- app-store-connectSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- correctSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- eli5Skill
- engineering-principlesSkill
- gauntlet-loopSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- goal-swarmSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- howSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- ios-hapticsSkill
- koubouSkill
- mergeSkill
- orchestrationSkill
- prSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- react-doctorSkill
- reframeSkill
- repo-cleanupSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- review-fix-loopSkill
- reviewSkill
- review-sweepSkill
- seoSkill
- setup-sreestackSkill
- show-dont-tellSkill
- showroomSkill
- snipsnap-do-choresSkill
- snip-snapSkill
- swift-testing-modernizationSkill
- swiftuiSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- ui-designSkill
- uikitSkill
- verifySkill
- wayfinderSkill
- web-component-inspirationSkill
- whySkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- xcode-security-auditSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.
20
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Use one concept when the question is whether a specific direction works.
- Distinctive: line 21
Use two when the decision is a genuine tradeoff.
- Distinctive: line 22
Add further options when each represents a distinct direction that the existing set does not test.
- Distinctive: line 30
Prefer the existing screen with its surrounding navigation, components, and representative content.
- Very specific: line 37
Use ui-design for visual direction and for browser behavior or accessibility.
- Very specific: line 39
Use animate when motion is part of the question.
- Very specific: line 40
Use swiftui or uikit for native Apple construction and behavior.
- Distinctive: line 44
Web: use the existing route when possible.
- Distinctive: line 46
SwiftUI or UIKit: use the app's framework. A preview can answer a static layout question.
- Distinctive: line 49
Other mobile or desktop platforms: use the app's normal framework and host, with the relevant input methods and window sizes.
- Distinctive: line 52
Use a browser mockup for a native product only when the user requests or accepts that fidelity.
- Distinctive: line 58
Use the project's components and design system while allowing each option to make its intended structural choice.
- Distinctive: line 62
Use the same representative content and meaningful empty, loading, error, or crowded states across options.
- Distinctive: line 65
Add only enough behavior to try the flow.
- Distinctive: line 67
When the requested workflow would write real data or cause another external effect, keep that step stubbed, state exactly what was not …
- Distinctive: line 74
Keep the code disposable but reliable enough to evaluate.
- Distinctive: line 86
Mobile: use a debug menu, sheet, or compact native picker that respects safe areas and existing gestures.
- Distinctive: line 88
Desktop: use a development menu or toolbar suited to the app.
- Distinctive: line 90
Keep sample state stable while switching when that makes the comparison fair.
- Distinctive: line 91
When options require different state or navigation, reset to a known starting point and make the reset visible.
- Very specific: line 97
Run every option on the target platform and exercise the interactions that answer the design question.
- Distinctive: line 109
Leave the choice open until the user picks one or asks you to choose.
- Distinctive: line 114
Before a decision, keep the prototype reviewable on the task branch or another clearly marked development surface.
- Distinctive: line 119
When production implementation is in scope, apply the chosen direction with the project's normal quality checks and remove prototype …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prototype
Build enough UI to answer a design question on the target platform. A prototype is an exploration surface, not authorization to ship the result.
1. Frame the experiment
Inspect the request, current interface, nearby code, and available tooling. State the design question, where the prototype will run, and what evidence would make the options distinguishable. Ask only when a missing choice would materially change what you build; continue safe, reversible work while waiting.
Choose an option set large enough to expose the real decision:
- Use one concept when the question is whether a specific direction works.
- Use two when the decision is a genuine tradeoff.
- Add further options when each represents a distinct direction that the existing set does not test.
Variants should differ in layout, information hierarchy, navigation, behavior, or motion rather than only color or copy. Follow a count the user specifies.
2. Choose the real surface
Prefer the existing screen with its surrounding navigation, components, and representative content. Use a separate prototype route, screen, preview, or development target when no existing screen fits. Clearly mark prototype files, entry points, and controls, and keep them out of release builds.
Load only the specialists the experiment needs:
- Use
ui-designfor visual direction and for browser behavior or accessibility. - Use
animatewhen motion is part of the question. - Use
swiftuioruikitfor native Apple construction and behavior.
Match the platform:
- Web: use the existing route when possible. A query parameter can make each option easy to reopen and share.
- SwiftUI or UIKit: use the app's framework. A preview can answer a static layout question; use the running app for navigation, gestures, keyboard behavior, system UI, or other runtime behavior.
- Other mobile or desktop platforms: use the app's normal framework and host, with the relevant input methods and window sizes.
Use a browser mockup for a native product only when the user requests or accepts that fidelity. When target tooling is unavailable, state the blocking tooling gap and what the fallback can and cannot establish.
3. Build safely
Use the project's components and design system while allowing each option to make its intended structural choice. Share stable fixtures and controls rather than forcing the options through one premature abstraction.
Use the same representative content and meaningful empty, loading, error, or crowded states across options. Reuse safe read-only data access when helpful. Stub writes, keep experimental state local, and prevent external side effects. Add only enough behavior to try the flow.
When the requested workflow would write real data or cause another external effect, keep that step stubbed, state exactly what was not exercised, and offer a provider test mode, disposable account, or local fixture instead.
Spend effort on the dimensions the question tests, such as hierarchy, spacing, touch targets, safe areas, keyboard overlap, resizing, or motion character.
Keep the code disposable but reliable enough to evaluate. Prefer running the prototype over production-grade automated coverage. Add a narrow test only when non-obvious experimental logic would otherwise make the result untrustworthy.
4. Make comparison easy
For multiple options, provide one development-only control that identifies the current option and switches without rebuilding. Keep it visually separate from the interface under review and away from its controls.
- Web: a switcher can update the option through the project's router. Keyboard shortcuts must leave text inputs and other controls alone.
- Mobile: use a debug menu, sheet, or compact native picker that respects safe areas and existing gestures.
- Desktop: use a development menu or toolbar suited to the app.
Keep sample state stable while switching when that makes the comparison fair. When options require different state or navigation, reset to a known starting point and make the reset visible. Give each option a short name that states its design choice.
5. Exercise and present
Run every option on the target platform and exercise the interactions that
answer the design question. Use verify when the judgment depends on a
real workflow. Use showroom to choose demonstrations and access.
For multiple options, exercise the switcher and confirm that its control stays clear of the interface and interactions under review.
Provide the run command or build target, entry screen, option controls, and any environment prerequisite needed to return to the prototype. Identify each screenshot or recording by option. Explain the tradeoff each option tests and state any behavior or platform condition that remains unverified.
Leave the choice open until the user picks one or asks you to choose. Combine parts only when the resulting direction remains coherent and testable.
6. Record and dispose
Before a decision, keep the prototype reviewable on the task branch or another clearly marked development surface. Once a direction is chosen, record the winner and why in a durable project surface already in scope, such as a PR description, project note, or authorized issue update.
When production implementation is in scope, apply the chosen direction with the project's normal quality checks and remove prototype controls and unused options. Preserve the prototype branch or artifacts when the user requests it, revisiting the comparison still has value, or no durable project record is authorized. When retained, record the branch pointer and run steps in the durable record when one is available. Otherwise retain the decision and evidence there, then clean up the disposable work.
A prototype-only request ends with a reviewable prototype, not a production change.
Done
The prototype is ready for a decision when the design question is explicit, each option tests a distinct answer, relevant states and interactions run on the target surface, comparison is easy, and the evidence and remaining gaps are clear. After a decision, completion also requires a recorded verdict and an explicit disposition for the disposable work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

