seo
Skill1 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose and improve website SEO. Use for crawling or indexing problems, search appearance, search-focused page content, structured data, or verifying deployed SEO fixes.
156 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mazzeoia/MazyOStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GstMirabal/Token-Optimized-Agent-Pipelinetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mahesh-Bishnoi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use seo-agentic, seo-maps and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AgriciDanielSkillseo-agentic
Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).
Also in 5 projects that use this
timruebenachSkillseo-maps
Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".
Also in 17 projects that use this
megastepSkillseo-images
Image optimization analysis for SEO and performance. Checks alt text, file sizes, formats, responsive images, lazy loading, and CLS prevention. Use when user says "image optimization", "alt text", "image SEO", "image size", or "image audit".
Also in 24 projects that use this
timruebenachSkillseo-image-gen
AI image generation for SEO assets: OG/social preview images, blog hero images, schema images, product photography, infographics. Powered by Gemini via nanobanana-mcp. Requires banana extension installed. Use when user says \"generate image\", \"OG image\", \"social preview\", \"hero image\", \"blog image\", \"product photo\", \"infographic\", \"seo image\", \"create visual\", \"image-gen\", \"favicon\", \"schema image\", \"pinterest pin\", \"generate visual\", \"banner\", or \"thumbnail\".
Also in 15 projects that use this
megastepSkillseo-sitemap
Analyze existing XML sitemaps or generate new ones with industry templates. Validates format, URLs, and structure. Use when user says "sitemap", "generate sitemap", "sitemap issues", or "XML sitemap".
Also in 26 projects that use this
renepfSkillorch-pipeline
Shared orchestration engine for the orch-* skill family. Defines the gated Research-Plan-TDD-Review-Commit pipeline, the size classifier, the agent map, and the two human gates that the orch-* operation skills delegate to. Not usually invoked directly.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +3 more from timruebenach
- +1 more from megastep
Other versions156 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 156
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20ksame name
- midudev/preguntas-entrevista-react★ 7.8ksame name
- legions-developer/evilcharts★ 3.2ksame name
- gridaco/grida★ 2.7ksame name
- midudev/la-velada-web-oficial★ 1.9ksame name
- midudev/tailwind-animations★ 1.5ksame name
- Bhanunamikaze/Agentic-SEO-Skill★ 993same name
- legions-developer/invoicely★ 923same name
- Nexus-JPF/note-companion★ 874same name
- iannuttall/seo★ 610same name
146 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-loginSkill
- animateSkill
- app-intentsSkill
- app-store-connectSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- correctSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- eli5Skill
- engineering-principlesSkill
- gauntlet-loopSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- goal-swarmSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- howSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- ios-hapticsSkill
- koubouSkill
- mergeSkill
- orchestrationSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- react-doctorSkill
- reframeSkill
- repo-cleanupSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- review-fix-loopSkill
- reviewSkill
- review-sweepSkill
- setup-sreestackSkill
- show-dont-tellSkill
- showroomSkill
- snipsnap-do-choresSkill
- snip-snapSkill
- swift-testing-modernizationSkill
- swiftuiSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- ui-designSkill
- uikitSkill
- verifySkill
- wayfinderSkill
- web-component-inspirationSkill
- whySkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- xcode-security-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 145 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Use ui-design for visual and accessibility work, react-best-practices for measured React/Next performance, and app-store-connect for App …
- Very specific: line 55
Discovery and indexing: Check internal links, sitemaps, actual status codes, robots.txt, hosting/CDN access, robots meta tags, and …
- Distinctive: line 95
Keep public URL and redirect changes consistent with existing links and search traffic.
- Distinctive: line 108
After changes reach the target deployment, crawl the affected URL families.
- Distinctive: line 109
Check new pages against the intended behavior and existing pages against the baseline.
- Distinctive: line 122
Use Search Console's URL Inspection when access exists.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 145 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SEO
Own organic search discoverability for public websites. For audits or plans, return evidence and prioritized changes. For authorized implementation, make and verify the requested changes. Keep deployment, account changes, and search submissions within the user's authorized scope.
Use ui-design for visual and accessibility work, react-best-practices for measured React/Next performance, and app-store-connect for App Store optimization. Broad marketing, paid ads, backlink outreach, and mass content generation are separate work.
Scope the request
Match the investigation to the job. A local metadata change needs its owning template and relevant regression checks; a site audit needs representative URL families and states. For a new site, establish the intended discovery and indexing behavior without inventing an existing failure.
Identify the production or intended canonical origin, affected pages, audience, search engine, and requested outcome. Inspect the framework/CMS, hosting configuration, and available Search Console or analytics evidence. Before changing indexing controls, distinguish pages intended for search from staging, private, duplicate, and other intentionally excluded URLs.
For an existing-site diagnosis, sample affected templates and relevant working, failing, redirect, duplicate, or excluded states where available. Record URLs, observation time, response evidence, and coverage. A sample supports conclusions about the observed scope, not a whole-site pass.
Finish with the intended search behavior, affected templates, available access, and evidence gaps identified. Continue repository and public-response checks when account access is unavailable.
Diagnose
For a reported problem, locate the failing stage: discovery, crawling, rendering, indexing, search appearance, or traffic/conversion. For traffic changes, compare the same URLs, queries, countries, devices, and date windows where data permits. Distinguish indexing failures from changes in demand, rankings, or click-through.
Consult official search-engine and framework documentation relevant to the selected checks and the project's versions. Open only the sections needed to resolve uncertainty or verify current behavior. Google-specific guidance does not establish another engine's behavior. Choose the checks that address the requested outcome:
- Discovery and indexing. Check internal links, sitemaps, actual status
codes, robots.txt, hosting/CDN access, robots meta tags, and
X-Robots-Tag. Preserve intentional exclusions. Google must crawl a page to seenoindex; robots.txt blocking alone does not ensure removal from search. Technical requirements, indexing controls. - JavaScript rendering. Compare response HTML with rendered content, links, metadata, and resource failures. Google renders JavaScript; choose server rendering or prerendering for an observed need, accounting for other target crawlers. JavaScript SEO.
- Duplicate URLs and redirects. Trace hops and final destinations; compare canonicals, sitemap entries, and internal links. Align signals with the intended equivalent URL. A declared canonical is a preference, not proof of Google's selection. Canonicalization.
- Metadata and content. Map search intent to useful pages. Use descriptive titles, relevant descriptions, clear headings, and crawlable internal links. Preserve factual claims and authorship; add substantive information rather than keyword repetition or arbitrary length targets. SEO Starter Guide.
- Structured data. Select a currently supported feature appropriate to the page and visible content. Validate required properties and eligibility, not just JSON syntax; a passing test does not guarantee a rich result. Structured data policies.
- Page experience. Measure the affected workload before changing it and compare the same conditions afterward. Use field and lab evidence for their respective purposes; a performance score is not proof of indexing or ranking. Page experience.
- Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Apply existing SEO and snippet eligibility. Google requires no special AI files or schema for these features. Check other providers' current requirements separately. AI features.
Finish with each finding tied to an observed URL/template, its likely cause, impact, proposed change, and acceptance check. Label hypotheses and prioritize access/indexing blockers before appearance refinements. Avoid turning an audit into an unconditional checklist of edits.
Apply supported changes
Fix the owning template, route, CMS setting, header rule, or hosting layer. Keep public URL and redirect changes consistent with existing links and search traffic. Use the project's metadata and sitemap facilities instead of a second competing implementation. Check the affected variants, including locale or pagination behavior when relevant.
Apply changes supported by the intended search behavior or diagnosis. Check current feature support before adding markup; Google's documentation updates record retirements as well as new features. Use tests for meaningful routing, metadata generation, or indexing-control regressions; a build alone does not establish search discoverability.
Verify the deployed result
After changes reach the target deployment, crawl the affected URL families. Check new pages against the intended behavior and existing pages against the baseline. Use the project's crawler or available HTTP and rendering tools; set a bounded URL set and crawl rate suited to the site. Verify:
- Actual GET responses, redirect hops and final URLs, status codes, and indexing headers through the public hosting/CDN path.
- Relevant robots.txt and sitemap responses; intended indexable URLs and preserved exclusions.
- Response HTML and rendered content where JavaScript matters: important text, crawlable links, titles/descriptions, canonicals, and applicable structured data.
- Discovery paths and template variants affected by the fix, including links that were previously broken or orphaned.
Use Search Console's URL Inspection when access exists. Distinguish its live fetch test from Google's stored indexed version and selected canonical. A local browser render or a spoofed Googlebot user agent does not prove Google's indexing behavior.
For an audit, report observed deployed behavior without making changes. For fixes not yet deployed, report code/local checks separately and name the pending deployment and live checks; do not claim deployed verification. Unavailable production or account access leaves an explicit evidence gap, not an inferred pass.
Handoff
Return the prioritized findings or implemented changes with affected URLs, checks and results, crawl scope, remaining gaps, and any follow-up observation. Separate technical eligibility, observed indexing, and measured search outcomes. Indexing, rich results, rankings, and traffic gains are not guaranteed; report later outcomes only from actual observations.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

