root-cause-investigation
Skill1 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Systematic investigation of metric changes and anomalies. Use when a metric unexpectedly changes, investigating business metric drops, explaining performance variations, or drilling into aggregated metric drivers.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- itsofficialadi/boundifftheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- chinthakat/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- OneDro1d/onedroid-docstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- chaakresh/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- iiiburnyiii/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen May 14, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- chaakresh/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- chinthakat/agent-skills★ 0same name
- iiiburnyiii/agent-skills★ 0same name
- itsofficialadi/boundiff★ 0same name
- OneDro1d/onedroid-docs★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository121 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-documentationSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-metrics-calculatorSkill
- chat-attachment-is-not-a-fileSkill
- claude-code-masterySkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codex-cli-specialistSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- cut-the-curveSkill
- data-narrative-builderSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- focused-fixSkill
- funnel-analysisSkill
- gate-must-derive-its-criterionSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- gsd-add-testsSkill
- gsd-ai-integration-phaseSkill
- gsd-audit-fixSkill
- gsd-audit-milestoneSkill
- gsd-audit-uatSkill
- gsd-autonomousSkill
- gsd-captureSkill
- gsd-cleanupSkill
- gsd-code-reviewSkill
- gsd-complete-milestoneSkill
- gsd-configSkill
- gsd-debugSkill
- gsd-discuss-phaseSkill
- gsd-docs-updateSkill
- gsd-eval-reviewSkill
- gsd-execute-phaseSkill
- gsd-exploreSkill
- gsd-extract-learningsSkill
- gsd-fastSkill
- gsd-forensicsSkill
- gsd-graphifySkill
- gsd-healthSkill
- gsd-helpSkill
- gsd-importSkill
- gsd-inboxSkill
- gsd-ingest-docsSkill
- gsd-managerSkill
- gsd-map-codebaseSkill
- gsd-milestone-summarySkill
- gsd-mvp-phaseSkill
- gsd-new-milestoneSkill
- gsd-new-projectSkill
- gsd-ns-contextSkill
- gsd-ns-ideateSkill
- gsd-ns-manageSkill
- gsd-ns-projectSkill
- gsd-ns-reviewSkill
- gsd-ns-workflowSkill
- gsd-pause-workSkill
- gsd-phaseSkill
- gsd-plan-phaseSkill
- gsd-plan-review-convergenceSkill
- gsd-pr-branchSkill
- gsd-profile-userSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Root Cause Investigation
When to use
- A key metric dropped (or spiked) unexpectedly and the team needs an explanation
- Stakeholders are asking "why did X happen?" and need an evidence-based answer
- A metric change has been observed but the team is unsure whether it's noise or signal
- Preparing a post-mortem after an incident that affected business metrics
- A trend change happened weeks ago and needs retrospective investigation
Process
- Validate the change — confirm the metric changed beyond normal variance using a z-score or simple comparison to the rolling average. If the change is within ±1.5 standard deviations, document it as within normal range and close. Use
scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py --validate. - Establish a timeline — plot the metric over time to pinpoint when the change started. A sudden step change suggests a specific event; a gradual drift suggests a structural shift.
- Decompose the metric — break the metric into its constituent parts (e.g., revenue = volume × price × mix). Determine which component is driving the change before drilling into dimensions.
- Drill down systematically — compare the metric before vs. after the change across available dimensions (geography, platform, channel, product category, user segment). Sort by absolute contribution to identify the primary driver. Use
scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py --drilldown. Seereferences/rca_framework.mdfor the structured approach. - Test hypotheses — generate explicit hypotheses (volume drop, mix shift, per-unit quality change, data issue) and accept or reject each with evidence. Correlate the timeline with known events from
references/hypothesis_testing_guide.md. - Write the root cause report — document the primary driver (quantified share of impact), supporting evidence, rejected hypotheses, and tiered recommendations (immediate / short-term / long-term). Use
assets/rca_report_template.md.
Inputs the skill needs
- Metric name and historical values (at least 30 days before the change)
- Granular data with dimensional breakdowns (geography, platform, segment, etc.)
- The date or date range when the change was noticed
- A change log or incident log for the same period (product releases, campaigns, outages)
- The business context: what decisions depend on this metric
Output
scripts/drilldown_analyzer.py— validates the change, computes dimensional drill-downs, and ranks contributors by impactreferences/rca_framework.md— structured five-step RCA method with decision rulesreferences/hypothesis_testing_guide.md— checklist of common root causes and how to test eachassets/rca_report_template.md— report template: what changed, when, primary driver, supporting evidence, timeline, recommendations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

