agentleFS
sp1esp1e/claude-skills/domain-modeling/SKILL.md

domain-modeling

Skill1 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

227 other projects use a version of this, 128 of them edited; 25 new projects in the last 4 weeks, against 11 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Surging: 25 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, 2.3× the 4 weeks before.

Week of Sep 13: 2 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 1 new projectWeek of Sep 27: 2 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 6 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 13 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 3 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 3 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 6 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use decision-mapping, loop-me and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • FabienDehopreSkill

    decision-mapping

    Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 56 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    implement-spec

    Implement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in code.

    Also in 69 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 5 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 153 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If a GLOSSARY-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts.

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Create files lazily: only when you have something to write.

    line 40
  3. Very specific:

    When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in GLOSSARY.md, call it out immediately.

    line 46
  4. Common:

    When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term.

    line 50
  5. Common:

    When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios.

    line 54
  6. Common:

    When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees.

    line 58
  7. Very specific:

    When a term is resolved, update GLOSSARY.md right there.

    line 62
  8. Common:

    Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

    line 68
  9. Common:

    If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR.

    line 74

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 153 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading GLOSSARY.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── GLOSSARY.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If a GLOSSARY-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
├── GLOSSARY-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── GLOSSARY.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── GLOSSARY.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no GLOSSARY.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in GLOSSARY.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"

Update GLOSSARY.md inline

When a term is resolved, update GLOSSARY.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md.

GLOSSARY.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat GLOSSARY.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.