gsd-discuss-phase
Skill1 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
4 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- open-gsd/get-shit-done-reduxedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- adrianoanthonymma16-boop/opencode-agentsedited, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- open-gsd/gsd-coreedited, first seen Sep 2, 2026
- ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxyedited, first seen May 9, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 4
- open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux★ 11k46% same
- open-gsd/gsd-core★ 11k46% same
- ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxy★ 5767% same
- adrianoanthonymma16-boop/opencode-agents★ 169% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository121 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-documentationSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-metrics-calculatorSkill
- chat-attachment-is-not-a-fileSkill
- claude-code-masterySkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codex-cli-specialistSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- cut-the-curveSkill
- data-narrative-builderSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- focused-fixSkill
- funnel-analysisSkill
- gate-must-derive-its-criterionSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- gsd-add-testsSkill
- gsd-ai-integration-phaseSkill
- gsd-audit-fixSkill
- gsd-audit-milestoneSkill
- gsd-audit-uatSkill
- gsd-autonomousSkill
- gsd-captureSkill
- gsd-cleanupSkill
- gsd-code-reviewSkill
- gsd-complete-milestoneSkill
- gsd-configSkill
- gsd-debugSkill
- gsd-docs-updateSkill
- gsd-eval-reviewSkill
- gsd-execute-phaseSkill
- gsd-exploreSkill
- gsd-extract-learningsSkill
- gsd-fastSkill
- gsd-forensicsSkill
- gsd-graphifySkill
- gsd-healthSkill
- gsd-helpSkill
- gsd-importSkill
- gsd-inboxSkill
- gsd-ingest-docsSkill
- gsd-managerSkill
- gsd-map-codebaseSkill
- gsd-milestone-summarySkill
- gsd-mvp-phaseSkill
- gsd-new-milestoneSkill
- gsd-new-projectSkill
- gsd-ns-contextSkill
- gsd-ns-ideateSkill
- gsd-ns-manageSkill
- gsd-ns-projectSkill
- gsd-ns-reviewSkill
- gsd-ns-workflowSkill
- gsd-pause-workSkill
- gsd-phaseSkill
- gsd-plan-phaseSkill
- gsd-plan-review-convergenceSkill
- gsd-pr-branchSkill
- gsd-profile-userSkill
- gsd-progressSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 28
Create CONTEXT.md with decisions that guide research and planning
- Common: line 35
Do not pre-load any workflow files before reading the mode routing instructions.
- Very specific: line 39
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion.
- Very specific: line 54
If --assumptions is in $ARGUMENTS: Read and execute $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
- Very specific: line 55
Read and execute $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
- Common: line 64
MANDATORY: Read the appropriate workflow file BEFORE taking any action.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<objective>
Extract implementation decisions that downstream agents need — researcher and planner will use CONTEXT.md to know what to investigate and what choices are locked.How it works:
- Load prior context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, STATE.md, prior CONTEXT.md files)
- Scout codebase for reusable assets and patterns
- Analyze phase — skip gray areas already decided in prior phases
- Present remaining gray areas — user selects which to discuss
- Deep-dive each selected area until satisfied
- Create CONTEXT.md with decisions that guide research and planning
Output: {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md — decisions clear enough that downstream agents can act without asking the user again
</objective>
<execution_context>
Workflow files are loaded on-demand in the <process> section below — not upfront.
Do not pre-load any workflow files before reading the mode routing instructions.
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op and roadmap/state tool calls.
</context>
<process>
**Mode routing:**
```bash
DISCUSS_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.discuss_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "discuss")
```If --assumptions is in $ARGUMENTS:
Read and execute $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
Stop here.
Otherwise, if DISCUSS_MODE is "assumptions":
Read and execute $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
Otherwise ("discuss" / unset / any other value):
Read and execute $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md end-to-end.
MANDATORY: Read the appropriate workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The objective and success_criteria sections in this command file are summaries — the workflow file contains the complete step-by-step process with all required behaviors, config checks, and interaction patterns. Do not improvise from the summary.
Lazy loading: templates/context.md is loaded inside the write_context step of the active workflow. discuss-phase-power.md is loaded inside discuss-phase.md when --power is detected. Do not load either here.
</process>
<success_criteria>
- Prior context loaded and applied (no re-asking decided questions)
- Gray areas identified through intelligent analysis
- User chose which areas to discuss
- Each selected area explored until satisfied
- Scope creep redirected to deferred ideas
- CONTEXT.md captures decisions, not vague vision
- User knows next steps </success_criteria>
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

