agentleFS
sp1esp1e/claude-skills/query-validation/SKILL.md

query-validation

Skill1 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

SQL query review for correctness, performance, and best practices. Activate when a query needs review before production use, shows unexpected results, or runs too slowly.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

When to use

  • A SQL query is about to be promoted to a production dashboard or report
  • A query is returning surprising or incorrect results
  • A query is running slowly and needs performance review
  • You want to catch anti-patterns (implicit conversions, SELECT *, unbounded CTEs) before they cause incidents

Process

  1. Lint the query — run scripts/sql_lint.py (sqlglot-based) to catch syntax errors, unsupported functions for the target engine, and style violations. Fix hard errors before continuing.
  2. Review anti-patterns — compare the query structure against references/sql_anti_patterns.md. Flag any present anti-patterns with a severity rating.
  3. Parse the explain plan — if an EXPLAIN or query profile output is available, run scripts/explain_plan_parser.py to extract slow steps (full table scans, missing indexes, high row estimates).
  4. Estimate cardinality — run scripts/cardinality_estimator.py if schema stats are available to flag joins that might fan-out unexpectedly.
  5. Check engine-specific behaviour — consult references/engine_specific_guide.md for the target engine (Snowflake / BigQuery / Postgres / Redshift) to verify date functions, window behaviour, and clustering assumptions.
  6. Produce review output — fill in assets/query_review_template.md with findings; for any performance issues found, complete assets/optimization_recommendations.md.

Inputs the skill needs

  • Required: the SQL query text
  • Required: target database engine (Snowflake / BigQuery / Postgres / Redshift / other)
  • Optional: relevant table schemas (column names, types, approximate row counts)
  • Optional: EXPLAIN / query profile output
  • Optional: expected business logic — what should the query calculate?

Output

  • assets/query_review_template.md (filled) — categorised findings: correctness, performance, style
  • assets/optimization_recommendations.md (filled, if issues found) — ranked rewrite suggestions with expected impact

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.