happy-feat
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Delight mode. Skip the usual ticket/spec process — scan the target codebase, pick the one thing that would make it more fun or delightful to use, and ship it complete on a happy-feat/<short-name> branch with a single commit and a one-paragraph "what & why cool" note. The user reviews in the morning and either merges or chucks it. Use when the user says "happy feat", "happy hour", "make it delightful", "build something fun", "end-of-day surprise", or pastes the happy-hour prompt.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- add-commentSkill
- agent-supervisorSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- anti-goalsSkill
- bestwaySkill
- codebase-renderSkill
- competitor-profilingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- decision-reviewSkill
- directory-submissionsSkill
- explain-and-saveSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- investment-researchSkill
- launchSkill
- learning-new-languageSkill
- lock-decisionsSkill
- moleSkill
- onboardingSkill
- open-source-reviewSkill
- pmSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- product-startupSkill
- prototype-treeSkill
- read-sessionSkill
- reverse-engineer-marketingSkill
- socialSkill
- understandSkill
- update-harnessSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
After-hours mode: build one small delight, ship it complete, let the user decide in the morning — merge or chuck.
- Distinctive: line 25
If nothing delightful fits the constraints, say so and stop.
- Distinctive: line 45
Write the one-paragraph note (what + why cool).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Happy Feat
After-hours mode: build one small delight, ship it complete, let the user decide in the morning — merge or chuck. Optimize for "worth merging", not for "safe".
Invoking this skill is the user's standing authorization for exactly what this skill describes (branch + commit on the target repo). It authorizes nothing else: no pushes, no merges, no PRs unless asked, no changes outside the branch.
Constraints (hard)
- New branch:
happy-feat/<short-name>. - Ship complete and working, not a sketch. Tests if they're cheap.
- Nothing the user would have to un-touch: no dependency bumps, no refactors of shared code, no config/infra changes.
- One commit. One-paragraph note at the top of the PR body: what you built and why you thought it'd be cool.
- If nothing delightful fits the constraints, say so and stop. A forced delight is worse than none.
Pick the delight
Scan for small joys with a small blast radius:
- a fun CLI subcommand or easter egg that fits the project's voice
- a better default that removes a papercut the user hits often
- a tiny UX joy: status line, theme, sound, animation, confetti on success
- a delightful test or dev-tool that makes the loop more fun
Tests for the pick: Would the user smile? Is it complete within one branch? Does it avoid everything in Constraints?
Build & ship
- Branch
happy-feat/<short-name>from the default branch. - Build it complete; run the project's verify; add cheap tests if any.
- Single commit, clear message.
- Write the one-paragraph note (what + why cool); hand it to the user as PR-body top. Do not open the PR unless asked.
- Report: branch name, what was built, the note, how to try it,
how to discard (
git branch -D happy-feat/<short-name>).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

