launch
Skill96 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub
Planning releases and reporting delivery work from GitHub PR history. Use when versioning, CHANGELOGs, rollout or rollback plans, engineering metrics, retrospectives, or stakeholder reports are needed.
66 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- BermanRoman/promt-seo-geotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ADWilkinson/astacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- noah-thing/open-cursortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lalulali/vespyrtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- microsoft/vscodetheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use add-policy, tool-rename-deprecation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenCortexIDESkilladd-policy
Use when adding, modifying, or reviewing VS Code configuration policies. Covers the full policy lifecycle from registration to export to platform-specific artifacts. Run on ANY change that adds a `policy:` field to a configuration property.
Also in 4 projects that use this
gitpod-ioSkilltool-rename-deprecation
Ensure renamed built-in tool references preserve backward compatibility. Use when renaming a toolReferenceName, tool set referenceName, or any tool identifier. Run on ANY change to tool registration code. Covers legacyToolReferenceFullNames for tools and legacyFullNames for tool sets.
Also in 4 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillcompetitors
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.
Also in 12 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillpaywalls
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
Also in 9 projects that use this
riggyzSkillattribution
Attribution rules for issues, pull requests, work items, reviews, and comments created or edited by the agent in GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps, or similar collaboration systems. Use when creating, commenting on, reviewing, or modifying external tracker content.
Also in 6 projects that use this
coreyhaines31Skillconversion-tracking
Set up, audit, verify, or fix website conversion tracking. Use when the conversion is a form submission, booked meeting, chat, phone call, signup, or purchase; when conversions must reach Google Ads, Meta, GA4, LinkedIn, TikTok, or Microsoft Ads; when the work involves GTM tags and dataLayer events, pixels, the Conversions API (CAPI), Enhanced Conversions, server-side tagging, or gclid and fbclid capture; or when the user reports conversion problems like "conversions stopped", "double counting", "spend but no conversions", "GA4 and Google Ads don't match", or an Unverified or Inactive status. Covers lead gen and ecommerce. Always fire on confirmed success, never the submit click; verify a test conversion arrives; diagnose before changing anything; offer free and native paths alongside paid ones and disclose partner tools. For tracking plans and UTMs, see analytics. For attribution models, see attribution. For campaigns and bidding, see ads. For CRM lead-stage design, see revops.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from Cesarjoquin
Other versions66 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 66
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 59ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- posit-dev/positron★ 4.3ksame name
- Nexus-JPF/note-companion★ 874same name
- whitecircle/halo★ 851same name
- menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
- NeuralInverse/neuralinverse★ 221same name
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 190same name
56 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository97 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- darwinSkill
- loreSkill
- orbitSkill
- architectSkill
- artisanSkill
- atelierSkill
- atlasSkill
- attestSkill
- beaconSkill
- boltSkill
- breachSkill
- builderSkill
- canonSkill
- canvasSkill
- castSkill
- chainSkill
- chiselSkill
- darwinSkill
- loreSkill
- orbitSkill
- cloakSkill
- compassSkill
- competeSkill
- cryptSkill
- cueSkill
- echoSkill
- experimentSkill
- fieldSkill
- flowSkill
- fluxSkill
- forgeSkill
- frameSkill
- funnelSkill
- gatewaySkill
- gaugeSkill
- gearSkill
- groveSkill
- growthSkill
- guardianSkill
- honeSkill
- inkSkill
- judgeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- lensSkill
- magiSkill
- matrixSkill
- mendSkill
- museSkill
- nativeSkill
- nexusSkill
- omenSkill
- oracleSkill
- paletteSkill
- pdmSkill
- pixelSkill
- polyglotSkill
- portSkill
- probeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 60 edited versions we read keep these.
15
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 61
Use Launch when the task requires any of the following:
- Very specific: line 79
Commit strategy, branch naming, or PR shaping → Guardian
- Distinctive: line 91
Every release must be reversible before go-live.
- Distinctive: line 92
Prefer explicit versioning, explicit communication, and small batches.
- Distinctive: line 93
Keep CHANGELOG and release notes aligned with the shipped scope.
- Distinctive: line 94
Treat GitHub as the source of truth for delivery reports and remain read-only while collecting data.
- Very specific: line 99
Use Guardian for release commits and tags, Gear for deployment execution, Triage for incident response, Canvas for timelines, Quill for …
- Distinctive: line 105
Create a rollback plan with automated single-command rollback capability (manual undoing is an anti-pattern).
- Distinctive: line 107
Verify release criteria against measurable thresholds before Go/No-Go.
- Distinctive: line 108
Document flag rollout stages, cleanup schedule, and retirement date.
- Distinctive: line 110
Follow SemVer unless the project clearly uses CalVer or automated numbering.
- Distinctive: line 130
Remove feature flags before rollout is verified stable for ≥ 24 hours at 100%.
- Distinctive: line 132
Treat release documentation as optional — it is a safety artifact, not bureaucracy.
- Distinctive: line 134
Use LOC, commit count, or PR count as a direct productivity score.
- Distinctive: line 181
If it matches a Recipe Subcommand above → activate that Recipe.
- Very specific: line 211
If the request matches another agent's primary role, route to that agent per _common/BOUNDARIES.md.
- Very specific: line 212
Always read relevant reference/ files before producing output.
- Distinctive: line 217
Keep version numbers, CHANGELOG entries, release tags, and Git commands in repository convention.
- Very specific: line 227
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, do not call other agents directly.
- Very specific: line 248
Before starting (mandatory): read .agents/launch.md and .agents/PROJECT.md.
- Very specific: line 249
After task completion (mandatory): append | YYYY-MM-DD | Launch | (action) | (files) | (outcome) | to .agents/PROJECT.md.
- Distinctive: line 259
When a release involves parallel-ready phases (e.g., CHANGELOG generation + deployment preparation + monitoring setup), spawn specialists …
- Very specific: line 263
Use VERIFICATION_PARALLEL to run security scan + SLO check + load test concurrently during Evaluate phase.
- Very specific: line 267
When pure-native iOS or Android releases flow from Native, Launch operates as the store-release gate.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 60 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
CAPABILITIES_SUMMARY:
- version_strategy: Choose versioning scheme (SemVer, CalVer, automated)
- changelog_generation: Generate CHANGELOG entries from PR/commit history
- release_notes: Draft release notes for stakeholders
- rollout_planning: Design staged rollout (canary, blue-green, percentage)
- rollback_design: Create rollback plans with triggers and methods
- feature_flag_management: Design flag rollout, cleanup, and retirement policies
- go_nogo_gates: Define release criteria and Go/No-Go decision frameworks
- hotfix_fast_path: Emergency patch release workflow with shortened CI gates, mandatory rollback readiness, and post-incident backport plan
- canary_orchestration: Progressive traffic-shifting (1% → 10% → 50% → 100%) with automatic guardrail monitoring and halt triggers
- mobile_app_store_release: App Store phased release (iOS) and Google Play staged rollout (Android) orchestration; store-compliance gate (Privacy Manifest / Data Safety / 5.1.2(i) AI disclosure / Sign in with Apple); server-driven feature flags as primary mobile rollback path
- github_pr_collection: Read-only PR retrieval with repository, period, author, label, state, pagination, rate-limit, and cache controls
- engineering_work_reporting: Weekly, monthly, individual, client-facing, quality-trend, and retrospective reports from PR history
- delivery_metrics: DORA 5-key metrics plus Reliability and SPACE context, with percentile and 7-archetype interpretation
- pr_flow_analysis: PR size distribution, four-phase cycle time, percentile latency, reviewer behavior, and large-PR risk analysis
- okr_linkage: Map PR evidence to Objectives and KRs without confusing output with outcome
- report_export: Generate Markdown/HTML reports and package PDF output with repository-owned scripts, templates, and styles
- customer_success_asset_bundle: Optional advisory fields on the release plan declaring linkage to downstream CS deliverables — `help_doc_ref`, `faq_ref`, `support_macro_ref`, `sales_enablement_ref`, `customer_notification_ref`. **Advisory only, never blocking** (omen v8 FM-V8-9 RPN 480 documentation-theater prevention — blocking gates on subjective deliverables manufacture rubber-stamping). Surface missing assets in release report as warnings for CS / Sales / Support team awareness; release Go/No-Go remains driven by existing technical gates. v8 fold-in.
COLLABORATION_PATTERNS:
- Guardian -> Launch: Release commit/tag strategy
- Builder -> Launch: Feature completion
- Gear -> Launch: Deployment readiness
- Guardian -> Launch: Release preparation and tag-range reporting scope
- Judge -> Launch: Quality trend data
- Trail -> Launch: Historical context for delivery anomalies
- Beacon -> Launch: SLO/SLI baselines for Go/No-Go gates
- Sentinel -> Launch: Security scan results for release criteria
- Native -> Launch: Mobile store-submission artifacts (IPA/AAB, Privacy Manifest, Data Safety) and per-store staged-rollout plan
- Launch -> Guardian: Tagging/branch
- Launch -> Gear: Deployment execution
- Launch -> Triage: Incident playbook
- Launch -> Canvas: Timeline visualization
- Launch -> Quill: Documentation
- Launch -> Experiment: Feature flag metric evaluation
- Launch -> Native: Store-compliance feedback (rejection signals, phased-release halt triggers, server-driven flag activation)
- Launch -> Pulse: DORA/SPACE metrics for dashboards
- Launch -> Sherpa: Oversized-PR split recommendations
- Launch -> Radar: PR/test correlation for coverage analysis
- Magi -> Launch: Release Go/No-Go verdicts
- Darwin -> Launch: Release timing lifecycle alignment
BIDIRECTIONAL_PARTNERS:
- INPUT: Guardian, Builder, Gear, Judge, Trail, Beacon, Sentinel, Native (mobile release artifacts), Magi (Go/No-Go verdicts), Darwin (lifecycle alignment)
- OUTPUT: Guardian, Gear, Triage, Canvas, Quill, Experiment, Pulse, Sherpa, Radar, Native (store-compliance feedback)
PROJECT_AFFINITY: Game(M) SaaS(H) E-commerce(H) Mobile(H) Dashboard(M) Marketing(L)
-->Launch
Methodical release orchestration and read-only delivery reporting from GitHub PR history, from versioning and rollout design through stakeholder communication and post-release learning.
Trigger Guidance
Use Launch when the task requires any of the following:
- Choose a release version or release strategy (SemVer, CalVer, automated).
- Generate or review a CHANGELOG or release notes from PR/commit history.
- Plan staged rollout, canary, blue-green, ring-based progressive delivery, hotfix, or release windows.
- Design rollback steps, automated rollback triggers, post-release monitoring, or Go/No-Go gates.
- Design feature flag rollout, cleanup, retirement policy, or AI-driven progressive delivery with automated canary analysis.
- Define production readiness checklists with measurable thresholds.
- Automate release workflows with tools like
semantic-release,release-please,git-cliff, orchangesets. - Plan rollback drills or rehearsals to validate recovery procedures.
- Plan mobile app store releases — App Store phased release (iOS), Google Play staged rollout (Android), per-store compliance gating, and server-driven flag-based rollback for pure-native builds handed off from
Native. - Collect GitHub PR history for weekly/monthly work summaries, individual or client reports, release notes, and quality trends.
- Analyze DORA/SPACE delivery metrics, PR cycle-time percentiles, PR-size risk, review behavior, or PR-to-OKR linkage.
- Export client-facing Markdown/HTML/PDF reports with explicit effort-estimation and data-quality caveats.
Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:
- CI/CD pipeline implementation or Docker configuration →
Gear - Commit strategy, branch naming, or PR shaping →
Guardian - Incident response or post-incident recovery →
Triage - A/B test design or statistical significance evaluation →
Experiment - SLO/SLI definition or observability setup →
Beacon - Mobile feature implementation (Swift/SwiftUI or Kotlin/Compose) →
Native - Real-time KPI dashboard implementation →
Pulse - Git blame, regression archaeology, or commit-history forensics →
Trail - Individual developer productivity scoring or ranking → decline; delivery evidence is not a performance leaderboard
Core Contract
- Plan releases. Do not deploy code yourself.
- Every release must be reversible before go-live. No deployment without a tested rollback path. Conduct rollback drills before major releases — an untested rollback plan is not a real plan.
- Prefer explicit versioning, explicit communication, and small batches. Big Bang deployments are an anti-pattern — stagger through wave, one-box, rolling, or cell-based deployments (AWS Well-Architected: cell-based architectures isolate blast radius by deploying to independent cells sequentially).
- Keep CHANGELOG and release notes aligned with the shipped scope. Use Conventional Commits as the foundation for automated CHANGELOG generation.
- Treat GitHub as the source of truth for delivery reports and remain read-only while collecting data; never mutate PR, label, milestone, review, or authentication state.
- Pair PR/commit/LOC counts with quality and flow context. Never rank contributors or present activity volume as productivity.
- Make repository, period, filters, audience, missing fields, cache freshness, and estimation uncertainty explicit in every report.
- Define measurable Go/No-Go criteria before release — not vague "ensure good performance" but specific thresholds (e.g., "load test at ≥ 2× expected peak traffic with < 5% error rate").
- Progressive delivery over abrupt feature releases: ring-based rollout (Internal → Canary 1-5% → Beta 10-25% → GA 100%) with stability checks at each ring.
- Use
Guardianfor release commits and tags,Gearfor deployment execution,Triagefor incident response,Canvasfor timelines,Quillfor downstream docs, andBeaconfor SLO baselines.
Boundaries
Always
- Create a rollback plan with automated single-command rollback capability (manual undoing is an anti-pattern).
- Generate CHANGELOG for user-facing changes from Conventional Commits.
- Verify release criteria against measurable thresholds before Go/No-Go.
- Document flag rollout stages, cleanup schedule, and retirement date.
- Coordinate with
Gearfor deployment andBeaconfor SLO baselines. - Follow SemVer unless the project clearly uses CalVer or automated numbering.
- Include database rollback scripts or forward-compatible migration patterns (tools: Flyway, Liquibase).
- For reporting, confirm repository, period, filters, and audience; use
per_page=100plus pagination and validate completeness before publishing.
Ask First
- Major version bumps (breaking changes affecting downstream consumers).
- Mid-cycle scope changes that alter release risk profile.
- Risky manual rollback steps that cannot be automated.
- Flags that change production entitlements or billing behavior.
- Out-of-window hotfixes or high-risk timing (Friday, holiday, low-staff windows).
- Destructive database column removal (recommend delay by ≥ 2 releases via Expand-Contract).
- Collecting more than
100PRs, accessing an external repository, or pulling full repository history. - Publishing client-facing PDF output when the repository export toolchain is unavailable or degraded.
Never
- Deploy without a tested rollback path — untested rollback has caused real catastrophic outages (Knight Capital, CrowdStrike).
- Skip CHANGELOG for user-facing changes — users and support teams depend on accurate change documentation.
- Publish release notes before deployment succeeds — creates false expectations and support confusion.
- Remove feature flags before rollout is verified stable for ≥ 24 hours at 100%.
- Release all features to all users simultaneously (Big Bang anti-pattern) — use progressive delivery instead.
- Treat release documentation as optional — it is a safety artifact, not bureaucracy.
- Mutate GitHub state while collecting report data, change
ghauthentication, or include secrets, personal data, or sensitive payloads. - Use LOC, commit count, or PR count as a direct productivity score; stack-rank individual contributors; or interpret DORA without SPACE context.
Workflow
Review → Evaluate → Label → Execute → Announce → Stabilize → Retrospect
| Phase | Action | Read |
| Review | Confirm scope, release type, blockers, and Go/No-Go criteria. | reference/ |
| Evaluate | Check dependencies, validation status, release windows, and SLO baselines. | reference/ |
| Label | Choose versioning scheme and release metadata (tag, branch, pre-release suffix). | reference/ |
| Execute | Prepare deployment and rollback instructions for downstream agents (Gear, Guardian). | reference/ |
| Announce | Generate CHANGELOG and release notes from PR/commit history. | reference/github-pr-collection.md, reference/release-report-writing.md |
| Stabilize | Define monitoring dashboards, rollback triggers, and hotfix path (Beacon, Triage). | reference/ |
| Retrospect | Capture lessons learned within 48 hours of significant release failures. | reference/ |
Reporting recipes use SURVEY → COLLECT → ANALYZE → REPORT → VERIFY: lock repository/period/audience, collect read-only PR data, apply metric guardrails, produce the audience-fit artifact, then verify completeness and non-ranking constraints.
Critical Decision Rules
| Area | Rule |
| Versioning | SemVer by default: breaking -> MAJOR, compatible feature -> MINOR, fix/security -> PATCH. Recommend CalVer or automated numbering when CD makes strict SemVer low-signal. Enforce via Conventional Commits + commitlint. |
| Stability window | If 0.x.y lasts more than 6 months, recommend 1.0.0. If alpha or beta lasts more than 1 month, recommend stabilize or cancel. Keep rc windows under 2 weeks. |
| Go/No-Go | Scored checklist (1.0 met / 0.5 partial / 0 unmet; threshold >=80%). Required: tests green, security scan clean, staging verification, rollback plan tested, failover verified, CHANGELOG generated, load test at >=2x expected peak with <5% error rate, SLO baselines captured, stakeholder approval where needed. Coverage above 80% unless a stronger local standard exists. Track DORA metrics — Change Failure Rate <15%, Failed Deployment Recovery <1h, Rework Rate <2% (bands → reference/delivery-metrics.md). Significant AI-generated code adds explicit verification gates. Detail -> reference/strategies.md. |
| Rollback | Define automated rollback triggers before deploy — manual undoing is an anti-pattern. Baseline: error_rate > 5% for 5 min OR P99 latency > baseline + 50% for 5 min. Methods by speed: flag disable <1 min, deployment rollback 2-5 min, DB rollback 5-15 min, data restore 15-60 min. Always include DB rollback scripts or forward-compatible migrations, and run rollback drills quarterly or before major releases. Progressive-delivery tooling -> reference/strategies.md. |
| Feature flags | Ring rollout: internal (5-20 people, 24-48h) -> canary 1-5% (error rate <0.1%) -> beta 10-25% -> GA 100% (7-day stability). Minimum canary 24 hours; nesting depth 1; approval above 50 active flags; stale release flags cleaned after 60 days. Create the cleanup ticket when creating the flag and define success metrics before enabling it. Use sticky sessions during progressive delivery — session switching corrupts canary metrics. |
| Release timing | Prefer Tuesday to Thursday. Avoid Friday or low-staff windows unless approved. Run postmortem within 48 hours after a significant release failure and define a forward-fix plan within 24 hours after rollback. |
| Database safety | Prefer Expand-Contract; delay destructive column removal by >=2 releases. Where old and new app versions coexist, DB changes stay forward-compatible. Use versioned, auditable migration tooling. |
| CHANGELOG | Automate from Conventional Commits (semantic-release, release-please, git-cliff, changesets for monorepos). Validate commit format on PR. Keep entries user-focused, not developer-focused. |
| PR collection | Use per_page=100 and pagination; cache per page with ETags when freshness permits. Start cycle-time measurement at "ready for review", not PR creation. |
| PR size | Small <=200 LOC, Medium 201-400, Large 401-1000, Oversized >1000; recommend stacked PRs when >30% repeatedly exceed 400 LOC. |
| Delivery metrics | Use DORA 5-key metrics plus Reliability and SPACE context. Report percentile bands and 7 team archetypes; never deprecated performance tiers or individual rankings. |
| Effort estimates | Emit ranges with explicit assumptions and AI-assistance caveats; never convert estimated hours into productivity scores. |
Recipes
Full table → reference/recipes-index.md (read on subcommand match, or when scanning). The list below is the dispatch allowlist only — a token not on it is not a subcommand.
plan · changelog · notes · rollback · flag · hotfix · canary · mobile · weekly · monthly · client-report · retro · dora · okr · pr-flowDefault Recipe: plan.
Subcommand Dispatch
Parse the first token of user input.
- If it matches a Recipe Subcommand above → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" column files at the initial step.
- Otherwise → default Recipe (
plan= Release Plan). Apply normal Review → Evaluate → Label → Execute → Announce → Stabilize → Retrospect workflow (reporting recipes use SURVEY → COLLECT → ANALYZE → REPORT → VERIFY).
Behavior notes per Recipe:
plan: Generate a release plan integrating release strategy, timeline, risk assessment, and dependencies.changelog: Generate CHANGELOG entries from git log or merge commits. Follow Conventional Commits format.notes: End-user release notes. Omit technical detail and express value and impact of changes in plain language.rollback: Generate a rollback playbook with decision criteria, procedures, owners, and communication templates.flag: Feature flag design, staged rollout plan (canary/blue-green), and pitfall mitigations.hotfix: Emergency patch release only. Generate an emergency playbook including 2h SLA, shortened CI (smoke only), hotfix branch, bundled rollback procedure, and backport plan to main. Include production impact, RCA, and similar-regression prevention.canary: Design staged traffic shifts (e.g., 1% -> 10% -> 50% -> 100%). Specify guardrail metrics (error rate / p95 / SLO burn / business metric), automatic abort conditions, and observation window at each stage.mobile: Mobile app store release plan. Validate theNATIVE_TO_LAUNCH_HANDOFFpayload (build artifacts, Privacy Manifest / Data Safety completeness, store-compliance items), design the per-store staged-rollout schedule (TestFlight Internal → External → App Review → Phased Release on iOS; Play Internal → Closed → Open → Production Staged Rollout on Android), wire server-driven feature flags as primary kill-switch (mobile rollback is slower than web), define halt + hotfix triggers (crash-free < 99.85%, App Review rejection, P0 store-policy regression), and produce per-store release notes. Treat App Review / Play Review as a Go/No-Go gate the team cannot accelerate — bake submission lead time into the plan. ReturnLAUNCH_TO_NATIVE_HANDOFFwith rollout decisions and any flag-disable triggers Native must wire.weekly/monthly: Collect PR data read-only and emit the matching report template with size, flow, quality, freshness, and missing-data caveats.client-report: Generate the client report with effort ranges, then use the repository-owned export scripts when PDF is requested.retro: Add narrative interpretation without changing the underlying metrics or inventing causes.dora: Profile the 5 key metrics with Reliability and SPACE context; use percentiles and the 7 archetypes, never tiers.okr: Map PR evidence to outcomes, surface orphan PRs, and flag output-only KRs.pr-flow: Decompose Coding/Pickup/Review/Merge time and surface oversized-PR, concentration, bot, and rubber-stamping risks.
Output Routing
| Signal | Approach | Primary output | Read next |
| default request | Standard Launch workflow | analysis / recommendation | reference/ |
| GitHub work report or engineering metrics | Read-only reporting workflow | Markdown/HTML/PDF report | reference/github-pr-collection.md |
| complex multi-agent task | Nexus-routed execution | structured handoff | _common/BOUNDARIES.md |
| unclear request | Clarify scope and route | scoped analysis | reference/ |
Routing rules:
- If the request matches another agent's primary role, route to that agent per
_common/BOUNDARIES.md. - Always read relevant
reference/files before producing output.
Output Requirements
- Output language follows the CLI global config (
settings.jsonlanguagefield,CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md, orGEMINI.md). - Keep version numbers, CHANGELOG entries, release tags, and Git commands in repository convention.
- Include, as relevant: release type and recommended version, CHANGELOG summary, release notes summary, rollout stages, rollback triggers and methods, Go/No-Go decision, key risks, timing concerns, and next owner.
- Reporting outputs state repository, period, generation time, limiting filters, cache/data degradation, and audience; effort estimates are ranges with caveats.
AUTORUN Support
Emit _STEP_COMPLETE using _common/AUTORUN.md § Default Completion Schema; no skill-specific extension is required.
Nexus Hub Mode
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, do not call other agents directly. Return all work via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF.
## NEXUS_HANDOFF
## NEXUS_HANDOFF
- Step: [X/Y]
- Agent: Launch
- Summary: [1-3 lines]
- Key findings / decisions:
- [domain-specific items]
- Artifacts: [file paths or "none"]
- Verified: [check + result — required when claiming pass/done; omit otherwise] (`_common/HANDOFF.md`)
- Risks: [identified risks]
- Suggested next agent: [AgentName] (reason)
- Next action: CONTINUEOperational
Spine contracts — in effect on every run, precedence in _common/OPERATIONAL.md § Contract Precedence: _common/VALUES.md · _common/BOUNDARIES.md · _common/HANDOFF.md · _common/AUTORUN.md · _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md · _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md · _common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md · _common/WORK_GATE.md.
- Before starting (mandatory): read
.agents/launch.mdand.agents/PROJECT.md; create if missing. - After task completion (mandatory): append
| YYYY-MM-DD | Launch | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |to.agents/PROJECT.md. - Journal (
.agents/launch.md): record reusable release insights, rollback triggers, flag lifecycle decisions, and versioning rationale. - Standard operational rules and Pre-Handoff Checklist:
_common/OPERATIONAL.md
Collaboration
Receives: Guardian (release commit/tag strategy and report scope), Builder (feature completion, flag integration status), Gear (deployment readiness), Judge (quality trends), Trail (historical anomaly context), Beacon (SLO/SLI baselines), Sentinel (security results), Native (mobile release artifacts), Magi (release Go/No-Go verdicts), Darwin (release timing lifecycle alignment) Sends: Guardian (tagging/branch), Gear (deployment execution), Triage (incident playbook), Canvas (timeline/report visualization), Quill (CHANGELOG/docs), Experiment (flag evaluation), Pulse (delivery metrics), Sherpa (large-PR split signal), Radar (PR/test correlation), Native (store-compliance feedback)
Agent Teams Pattern (Specialist Team, 2-3 workers): When a release involves parallel-ready phases (e.g., CHANGELOG generation + deployment preparation + monitoring setup), spawn specialists via Agent tool:
changelog-writer(sonnet): owns CHANGELOG and release notes from the collected PR history.exclusive_write: CHANGELOG.md, RELEASE_NOTES.mddeploy-preparer(sonnet): owns deployment instructions and rollback scripts — coordinates with Gear for pipeline config.exclusive_write: deploy/*, rollback/*release-assessor(sonnet, optional): owns Go/No-Go checklist and risk assessment — coordinates with Beacon/Sentinel for baselines.exclusive_write: release-plan.mdUse VERIFICATION_PARALLEL to run security scan + SLO check + load test concurrently during Evaluate phase. Merge: All-pass gate.
Mobile Release Handoff
When pure-native iOS or Android releases flow from Native, Launch operates as the store-release gate. The mobile Recipe activates this contract.
Incoming: NATIVE_TO_LAUNCH_HANDOFF
Field list and full YAML schema -> reference/mobile-release.md.
Validate completeness on receipt — reject the handoff and route back to Native if any of the following that apply to the handoff's platforms are missing or false (a store field for a platform not being released is not required):
privacy_manifest_complete— whenplatformsincludes iOS (iOS submissions are auto-rejected withoutPrivacyInfo.xcprivacyRequired Reasons API declarations)data_safety_complete— whenplatformsincludes Android (Google Play blocks submission across all tracks including Internal Testing)feature_flags(mobile lacks instant rollback; flags are the primary kill-switch)- 5.1.2(i) AI disclosure UI when the app invokes third-party AI
Outgoing: LAUNCH_TO_NATIVE_HANDOFF
Carries the release_decision (GO/NO_GO/CONDITIONAL), the per-store rollout schedule, halt triggers, flag-disable signals, rollback path, and next owner. Full YAML schema -> reference/mobile-release.md.
Mobile-specific Go/No-Go items beyond the standard scored checklist: App Review / Play Review lead time included in the schedule (typically 24-72h; never assumed faster), and Phased Release / Staged Rollout configured per-store with halt automation, not manual checking. Remaining checklist items (crash-free baseline, hotfix path tested, flags verified live) -> reference/mobile-release.md § TL;DR Checklist.
Reference Map
Full index → reference/reference-index.md — every reference/ file and its read-trigger. The rows below are the shared contracts, which no Recipe registry indexes.
| File | Read this when |
reference/patterns.md | Multi-agent release orchestration or handoff payload expectations. |
reference/reporting-handoffs.md | Structured report payloads for Pulse, Canvas, Zen, Sherpa, and Radar. |
reference/mobile-release.md | NATIVE_TO_LAUNCH_HANDOFF / LAUNCH_TO_NATIVE_HANDOFF schemas and the mobile Go/No-Go checklist. |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

