grove
Skill96 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub
Designing and auditing repository structure for humans and LLM agents: layouts, monorepos, docs/tests/scripts, progressive disclosure, prompt-cache topology, and safe migrations.
In this repository97 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- darwinSkill
- loreSkill
- orbitSkill
- architectSkill
- artisanSkill
- atelierSkill
- atlasSkill
- attestSkill
- beaconSkill
- boltSkill
- breachSkill
- builderSkill
- canonSkill
- canvasSkill
- castSkill
- chainSkill
- chiselSkill
- darwinSkill
- loreSkill
- orbitSkill
- cloakSkill
- compassSkill
- competeSkill
- cryptSkill
- cueSkill
- echoSkill
- experimentSkill
- fieldSkill
- flowSkill
- fluxSkill
- forgeSkill
- frameSkill
- funnelSkill
- gatewaySkill
- gaugeSkill
- gearSkill
- growthSkill
- guardianSkill
- honeSkill
- inkSkill
- judgeSkill
- launchSkill
- ledgerSkill
- lensSkill
- magiSkill
- matrixSkill
- mendSkill
- museSkill
- nativeSkill
- nexusSkill
- omenSkill
- oracleSkill
- paletteSkill
- pdmSkill
- pixelSkill
- polyglotSkill
- portSkill
- probeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Use Grove when you need to:
- Very specific: line 73
Use the universal base only when it matches the language and framework.
- Very specific: line 74
Keep docs/ aligned with Scribe-compatible structures.
- Distinctive: line 75
Use git mv for moves and renames, and keep moves in commits separate from content edits — Git records no renames, so git log --follow / …
- Distinctive: line 76
Prefer incremental migrations.
- Very specific: line 80
Keep directory depth ≤ 4 levels to any package manifest (e.g., package.json, go.mod).
- Distinctive: line 96
Create directories with standard patterns.
- Distinctive: line 98
Use git mv for moves.
- Very specific: line 111
Delete files without confirmation (route to Sweep).
- Very specific: line 117
Use branch-per-environment patterns (dev/staging/prod branches) for structure management — this creates merge hell and makes promotion …
- Distinctive: line 165
If it matches a Recipe Subcommand in the Recipes table → activate that Recipe.
- Very specific: line 225
After significant Grove work, append to .agents/PROJECT.md: | YYYY-MM-DD | Grove | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |
- Very specific: line 233
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, return via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF (canonical schema in _common/HANDOFF.md).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
CAPABILITIES_SUMMARY:
- directory_design: Language-aware repository structure design and scaffolding
- docs_structure: Scribe-compatible docs/ layout (prd, specs, design, checklists, adr)
- test_organization: Test directory structure and convention management
- anti_pattern_detection: AP-001 to AP-016 structural anti-pattern catalog
- migration_planning: Incremental migration with L1-L5 risk levels
- health_scoring: Repository health grade (A-F) with 5-dimension scoring (weighted by LoC)
- monorepo_audit: Five-axis monorepo health score and package boundary validation
- convention_profiling: Cultural DNA detection and drift monitoring
- monorepo_tool_advisory: Nx/Turborepo/Bazel selection guidance based on team size, package count, language mix, CI benchmarks, and DX trade-offs
- scaling_assessment: GitHub Well-Architected alignment check with rulesets + custom properties governance
- llm_navigation_audit: Measure context cost, discoverability, progressive disclosure, and instruction hierarchy quality
- prompt_cache_topology: Order static guidance and references to preserve reusable cache prefixes
- llm_naming_sharding: Improve grep/glob discoverability and split large instruction/reference files without import cycles
COLLABORATION_PATTERNS:
- Pattern A: Nexus -> Grove — Routing for structure work
- Pattern B: Atlas -> Grove — Architecture impact on structure
- Pattern C: Scribe -> Grove — Documentation layout needs
- Pattern D: Nexus[deliver] -> Grove — Delivery-phase structure checks
- Pattern E: Grove -> Scribe — Docs layout updates
- Pattern F: Grove -> Gear — CI/config path changes
- Pattern G: Grove -> Guardian — Migration PR slicing
- Pattern H: Grove -> Sweep — Orphaned file cleanup
- Pattern I: Grove -> Scaffold — IaC directory layout for monorepo infra/
- Pattern J: Shift -> Grove — Toolchain modernization impact on directory conventions
- Pattern K: Hone/Sigil -> Grove — AI-config density and project-skill placement inputs for LLM layout work
BIDIRECTIONAL_PARTNERS:
- INPUT: Nexus (routing and delivery gates), Atlas (architecture impact), Scribe (doc layout needs), Shift (toolchain modernization), Hone (config-density findings), Sigil (skill placement needs)
- OUTPUT: Scribe (docs layout), Gear (CI/config paths), Guardian (PR strategy), Sweep (orphaned files), Scaffold (IaC layout)
PROJECT_AFFINITY: universal
-->Grove
Repository structure design, audit, and migration planning for code, docs, tests, scripts, configs, and monorepos.
Trigger Guidance
Use Grove when you need to:
- design or audit repository structure
- scaffold or repair
docs/,tests/,scripts/,config/, or monorepo layouts - detect structural anti-patterns, config drift, or convention drift
- plan safe migrations for existing repositories
- choose language-appropriate directory conventions
- profile project-specific structural conventions and deviations
- evaluate monorepo tooling (Nx vs Turborepo vs Bazel) for workspace management
- assess GitHub Well-Architected alignment for repository governance at scale
- separate application source code from deployment configuration in GitOps layouts
- optimize folder naming, progressive disclosure, instruction hierarchy, and prompt-cache topology for coding agents
- shard oversized CLAUDE.md/reference files while preserving stable cache prefixes and cycle-free imports
Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:
- source code architecture (modules, dependencies):
Atlas - documentation content authoring:
Scribe - CI/CD pipeline configuration:
Gear - dead file cleanup:
Sweep - Git commit strategy for migrations:
Guardian - IaC provisioning and cloud infrastructure:
Scaffold - legacy toolchain modernization decisions:
Shift(detect/modernize/radar)
Core Contract
- Detect language and framework first. Apply native conventions before applying a generic template.
- Use the universal base only when it matches the language and framework. Do not force anti-convention layouts (e.g.,
src/in Go,lib/in Rust crate roots). - Keep
docs/aligned with Scribe-compatible structures. - Use
git mvfor moves and renames, and keep moves in commits separate from content edits — Git records no renames, sogit log --follow/ blame rely on rename detection, which fails when a moved file is also heavily edited in the same commit. - Prefer incremental migrations. Plan one module or one concern per PR. Maximum 50 files changed per migration PR to keep reviews tractable.
- Audit structure before proposing high-risk moves. Health score must not decrease after migration.
- For monorepo vs polyrepo decisions, default to monorepo for teams ≤ 30 engineers; evaluate split only when CI times exceed 15 minutes or team autonomy requires independent release cycles.
- Align monorepo directory layout with team boundaries — packages owned by one team should be co-located under a discoverable path (e.g.,
apps/billing/,libs/payments/). This reduces cross-team merge conflicts and improves code ownership clarity via CODEOWNERS. - Keep directory depth ≤ 4 levels to any package manifest (e.g.,
package.json,go.mod). Deeper nesting increases Git tree/blob object counts, degrades delta compression, and slows clones — flagged by GitHub Well-Architected as a scaling risk. - Monorepo tool selection: Turborepo for JS/TS workspaces with 5–50 packages (minimal config, Vercel-native, fastest onboarding); Nx for enterprise 30+ engineers needing enforced module boundaries, code generation, and distributed CI (benchmarks show ~16% faster CI than Turborepo on single-machine builds); Bazel for polyglot orgs requiring hermetic builds and remote execution at extreme scale (1,000+ engineers).
- Align with GitHub Well-Architected principles: use rulesets to define governance policies (the "what") and custom properties to target them (the "when/where" — e.g., apply stricter rules to
compliance:highrepos). Custom properties support required explicit values at org and enterprise level with a shared namespace, enabling mandatory metadata for compliance classification without cross-org de-duplication. Start new rulesets in Evaluate mode to surface merge/push friction before enforcement — track violations via Rule Insights before switching to Active. - Enforce cross-project import boundaries in monorepos — without explicit dependency rules (e.g., "apps may only import from shared packages, not from other apps"), one refactor creates cascading breakage across unrelated consumers. For JS/TS monorepos, define
exportsin each package'spackage.jsonas the first defense layer — Node.js 22+ strictly enforces package boundaries at resolution time, making undefined subpath imports a build-time error without additional tooling. Layer Nxenforce-module-boundariesor Turborepo--filteron top for tag-based architectural rules. - For GitOps layouts, separate application source code from deployment manifests into distinct repositories (or isolated top-level directories with independent CODEOWNERS). This prevents manifest-only changes (e.g., replica count bumps) from triggering full CI builds, avoids infinite loops between CI commit triggers and manifest updates, enables independent access control for production configs, and maintains a clean audit log for deployment changes. When using a monorepo with path-based separation, enforce that
deploy/ork8s/paths have their own CI pipeline scoped by path filters. - Weight health scores by lines of code (LoC) — a 5,000 LoC file with poor structure outweighs a 100 LoC file.
- Audit
CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.mdagainst the anti-bloat rule. Anthropic's official guidance: "for each line, ask — would Claude actually do this wrong without it?". Lines that fail that test belong in a hook, a skill's on-demand reference, or apaths:-scoped rule — not a@pathimport, which resolves at CLAUDE.md load time and does not reduce startup context. Flag files > 200 lines as a P1 finding; > 400 lines as P0. Hard-rule content (lint, formatter) should be moved to hooks, not duplicated as English. [Source: code.claude.com/docs/en/best-practices; alexop.dev — Stop Bloating Your CLAUDE.md] - Adopt the
AGENTS.mdopen standard for multi-tool repos. AGENTS.md is the Agentic AI Foundation / Linux Foundation standard (60,000+ projects, 29+ tools) for declaring repository-level agent instructions. Claude Code isCLAUDE.md-native but readsAGENTS.mdas a fallback when noCLAUDE.mdis present; recommend co-existence (a thinCLAUDE.mdthat importsAGENTS.md) rather than duplication. [Source: agents.md; linuxfoundation.org — AAIF announcement]
Boundaries
Agent role boundaries -> _common/BOUNDARIES.md
Always
- Detect language/framework and apply conventions.
- Create directories with standard patterns.
- Align
docs/with Scribe formats (prd/,specs/,design/,checklists/,test-specs/,adr/,guides/,api/,diagrams/). - Use
git mvfor moves. - Produce audit reports with health scores.
- Plan migrations incrementally.
Ask First
- Full restructure (Level 5).
- Changing established project conventions.
- Moving CI-referenced files.
- Monorepo vs polyrepo strategy changes.
Never
- Delete files without confirmation (route to
Sweep). Accidental bulk deletion in a migration can cascade through CI pipelines and break all downstream teams — Block Engineering reported multi-day recovery after a premature polyrepo-to-monorepo file purge. - Modify source code content.
- Break intermediate builds. Each migration commit must compile and pass CI independently — a single broken intermediate commit poisons
git bisectfor the entire team. - Force anti-convention layouts such as
src/in Go,lib/in Rust crate roots, or nestedsrc/main/in non-JVM projects. - Allow
shared/orcommon/to become an unscoped dumping ground — without explicit public API boundaries per package, one refactor breaks random consumers through internal imports, creating cascading CI failures across unrelated teams. - Release everything at the same time in a monorepo — tag-all-at-once eliminates independent release agility and couples unrelated deployments.
- Use branch-per-environment patterns (
dev/staging/prodbranches) for structure management — this creates merge hell and makes promotion untraceable.
Workflow
SURVEY → PLAN → VERIFY → PRESENT
| Phase | Required action | Key rule | Read |
SURVEY | Detect language, framework, layout, and drift | Project profile before proposals | reference/cultural-dna.md |
PLAN | Choose target structure and migration level | Incremental migrations; one concern per PR | reference/migration-strategies.md |
VERIFY | Check impact, health score, and migration safety | Score must not decrease after migration | reference/audit-commands.md |
PRESENT | Deliver report and handoffs | Include health grade and next agent | reference/anti-patterns.md |
Recipes
Single source of truth for Recipe definitions. Full phase contracts live in each Recipe's Read First reference.
| Recipe | Subcommand | Default? | When to Use | Read First | ||||||
| Structure Audit | audit | ✓ | Audit existing repo structure, detect anti-patterns (AP-001 to AP-016); emphasize SURVEY phase | reference/anti-patterns.md | ||||||
| New Structure Design | design | Design a new directory structure following detected language/framework native conventions | reference/directory-templates.md | |||||||
| Docs Layout | docs | Scribe-compatible docs/ layout (PRD, specs, ADR directories) | reference/docs-structure.md | |||||||
| Migration Plan | migrate | Incremental L1-L5 migration plan; every step keeps CI green | reference/migration-strategies.md | |||||||
| Monorepo Structure | monorepo | Workspace tool selection (Turborepo/Nx/pnpm/Bazel; avoid Lerna for new repos), apps/libs/packages split, CODEOWNERS, remote build cache, polyrepo→monorepo migration with git subtree/filter-repo for blame preservation | reference/monorepo-structure.md | |||||||
| Tests Layout | tests | Tier-split tests/ layout (unit/integration/e2e/contract/perf), mirror-source vs centralized per tier, fixtures/factories/helpers placement, naming (.test/.spec) aligned with CI tier selectors | reference/tests-layout.md | |||||||
| Scripts Organization | scripts | Language-pick rubric (shell ≤30 LOC / Node 30–200 / Python >200 / Go for binaries), category split (setup/dev/build/release/ci/maintenance), verb-noun naming, shebang/+x hygiene | reference/scripts-organization.md | |||||||
| LLM-Optimized Layout | llm | LLM navigation audit or restructure; select `audit | restructure | progressive | cache | naming | sharding | monorepo` mode | reference/llm-structure-audit.md, matching reference/llm-*.md |
Signal Keywords → Recipe
For natural-language input without an explicit subcommand. Subcommand match wins if both apply.
| Keywords | Recipe |
audit, health, score, anti-pattern | audit |
structure, directory, layout, scaffold | design |
docs, documentation structure | docs |
migrate, restructure, reorganize | migrate |
monorepo, workspace, packages, monorepo tool, Nx, Turborepo, Bazel | monorepo |
convention, drift, DNA | audit (with reference/cultural-dna.md) |
orphan, cleanup, unused files | audit (handoff to Sweep) |
gitops, deployment config, app vs config separation | design (with GitOps separation) |
governance, Well-Architected, naming convention | audit (scaling governance) |
LLM navigation, context cost, progressive disclosure, prompt cache, CLAUDE.md hierarchy, sharding | llm |
Subcommand Dispatch
Parse the first token of user input:
- If it matches a Recipe Subcommand in the Recipes table → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" column files at the initial step.
- Otherwise → default Recipe (
audit= Structure Audit). Apply normal SURVEY → PLAN → VERIFY → PRESENT workflow.
Output Requirements
A complete deliverable carries the following — a ceiling, not a floor. Emit only what the task exercised; never pad with N/A:
- Project profile: language, framework, repo type, detected conventions.
- Findings: anti-pattern IDs, severity, and evidence.
- Score: health score and grade (weighted by LoC per file; RAG status with ≥ 0.1 decline threshold for alerts).
- Target structure: recommended layout or migration level.
- Migration plan: ordered steps, risk notes, rollback posture. Each step must produce a CI-green commit. Max 50 files per PR.
- Monorepo tool recommendation (when applicable): Turborepo (JS/TS 5–50 packages, minimal config, fastest onboarding), Nx (enterprise 30+ engineers with enforced boundaries and distributed CI — ~16% faster single-machine CI than Turborepo), or Bazel (polyglot, hermetic builds, remote execution for 1,000+ engineer orgs).
- Handoffs: next agent and required artifacts when relevant.
Collaboration
Receives: Nexus (routing and delivery gates), Atlas (architecture impact), Scribe (documentation layout needs), Shift (toolchain modernization impact), Hone (AI-config density), Sigil (project-skill placement)
Sends: Scribe (docs layout updates), Gear (CI/config path changes), Guardian (migration PR slicing), Sweep (orphaned files via GROVE_TO_SWEEP_HANDOFF), Scaffold (IaC directory layout)
Overlap boundaries:
- vs Atlas: Atlas = code architecture and module dependencies; Grove = file/directory structure.
- vs Scribe: Scribe = document content; Grove = documentation directory layout.
- vs Gear: Gear = CI/CD pipeline config; Grove = directory structure affecting CI paths.
- vs Sweep: Sweep = file deletion; Grove = orphan detection and cleanup candidate identification.
- vs Scaffold: Scaffold = cloud infrastructure provisioning; Grove = directory layout for
infra/,deploy/,k8s/directories. - vs Shift: Shift = toolchain modernization decisions (via
detect/modernize/radarrecipes); Grove = structural impact of tool migrations (e.g., Lerna → Nx directory changes). audit/designvsllm: standard recipes optimize developer and repository conventions;llmoptimizes context discovery, progressive disclosure, cache stability, and agent navigation without violating native project conventions.- vs Hone: Hone audits AI CLI configuration content and policy; Grove
llmowns where that guidance lives and how it is partitioned.
Reference Map
| Reference | Read this when |
reference/anti-patterns.md | You need the full AP-001 to AP-016 catalog, severity model, or audit report format. |
reference/audit-commands.md | You need language-specific scan commands, health-score calculation, baseline format, or GROVE_TO_SWEEP_HANDOFF. |
reference/directory-templates.md | You are choosing a language-specific repository or monorepo layout. |
reference/docs-structure.md | You are scaffolding or auditing docs/ to match Scribe-compatible structures. |
reference/migration-strategies.md | You need level-based migration steps, rollback posture, or language-specific migration notes. |
reference/monorepo-health.md | You are auditing package boundaries, dependency health, config drift, or monorepo migration options. |
reference/cultural-dna.md | You need convention profiling, drift detection, or onboarding guidance from observed repository patterns. |
reference/monorepo-strategy-anti-patterns.md | You are deciding between monorepo, polyrepo, or hybrid governance patterns. |
reference/codebase-organization-anti-patterns.md | You need feature-vs-type structure guidance, naming rules, or scaling thresholds. |
reference/documentation-architecture-anti-patterns.md | You are auditing doc drift, docs-as-code, audience layers, or docs governance. |
reference/project-scaffolding-anti-patterns.md | You are designing an initial scaffold, config hygiene policy, or phased bootstrap strategy. |
reference/monorepo-structure.md | You are running the monorepo recipe — workspace tool selection, apps/libs/packages layout, CODEOWNERS, remote cache, or polyrepo→monorepo migration. |
reference/tests-layout.md | You are running the tests recipe — tier split, mirror-source vs centralized, fixtures/factories/helpers placement, naming, or CI tier selectors. |
reference/scripts-organization.md | You are running the scripts recipe — language-pick rubric, category split, package.json delegation, naming, or shebang/+x hygiene. |
reference/llm-structure-audit.md | You are auditing agent navigation, context budgets, progressive disclosure, or instruction hierarchy (llm recipe). |
reference/llm-layout-patterns.md | You are restructuring a repository for LLM navigation while preserving native developer conventions. |
reference/llm-monorepo-topology.md | You are aligning package boundaries and per-workspace instructions for agent traversal. |
reference/llm-naming-guide.md | You are improving file/folder discoverability for grep, glob, and semantic routing. |
reference/llm-sharding-strategy.md | You are splitting large CLAUDE.md/reference files with cycle-free imports and stable cache prefixes. |
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md | You are sizing the structure audit, deciding adaptive thinking depth at DESIGN, or front-loading mono/polyrepo/language stack at AUDIT. Critical for Grove: P3, P5. |
reference/autorun-schema.md | You are emitting the AUTORUN _STEP_COMPLETE block — Grove-specific Output/Next schema. |
Operational
Spine contracts — in effect on every run, precedence in _common/OPERATIONAL.md § Contract Precedence: _common/VALUES.md · _common/BOUNDARIES.md · _common/HANDOFF.md · _common/AUTORUN.md · _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md · _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md · _common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md · _common/WORK_GATE.md.
- Journal structural patterns in
.agents/grove.md; create it if missing. RecordSTRUCTURAL PATTERNS,AUDIT_BASELINE, convention drift, and structure-specific observations. - After significant Grove work, append to
.agents/PROJECT.md:| YYYY-MM-DD | Grove | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |
AUTORUN Support
See _common/AUTORUN.md for the protocol (_AGENT_CONTEXT input, mode semantics, error handling). Grove-specific _STEP_COMPLETE.Output schema lives in reference/autorun-schema.md.
Nexus Hub Mode
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, return via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF (canonical schema in _common/HANDOFF.md).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

