team-release
Skill69 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Version management and deployment methodology. Semver, CHANGELOG, CI/CD, deployment steps, environment variables, rollback plan. The playbook of the devops role.
- Reads credentials
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- chuanglibs/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-Codextheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiostheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- venus2099/codex-game-studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- scotidev/GameDevStudiotheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +10 more from lilangMax
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 39ksame name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 124same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 19same name
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 17same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 8same name
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 5same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- team/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- team-architectureSkill
- team-backlogSkill
- team-brandSkill
- team-buildSkill
- team-disciplineSkill
- team-docsSkill
- team-marketingSkill
- team-market-researchSkill
- team-memorySkill
- team-prdSkill
- team-qaSkill
- team-security-reviewSkill
- team-uxSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 50
Write the changes visible to the user, not "refactor"
- Distinctive: line 51
Write the behavior, not the commit hash
- Distinctive: line 57
If a tag push already generates the CHANGELOG, do not write it by hand.
- Very specific: line 65
After the PR merges, .github/workflows/release-publish.yml publishes to npm, attests provenance and creates the GitHub Release from the …
- Distinctive: line 113
Never write the value: Only the name, type, description, requiredness.
- Very specific: line 120
Write .env.example: variable names + description, values empty.
- Distinctive: line 132
If you are making a change that cannot be rolled back, state this before the deployment and write a backup plan.
- Distinctive: line 142
Every log line should carry a request ID, otherwise debugging is impossible.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Versioning and Deployment
1. Versioning
Semver: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
| Change | Version |
| Backward-incompatible API change | MAJOR |
| New feature, backward compatible | MINOR |
| Bug fix | PATCH |
Pre-release: 1.0.0-alpha.1, 1.0.0-rc.1
Determine the version number with its rationale. Do not say "we did everything"; classify what kind of change was made.
2. CHANGELOG
In Keep a Changelog format, in English:
# Changelog
All notable changes to this project are documented in this file.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
## [1.1.0] - 2026-10-21
### Added
- Invoice PDF export with configurable template
### Changed
- Dashboard query now uses the composite index on (user_id, created_at)
### Fixed
- Timezone offset applied twice when parsing invoice dates
### Security
- Session cookies now set `SameSite=Lax`Rules:
- Write the changes visible to the user, not "refactor"
- Write the behavior, not the commit hash
- Breaking changes go under
### BREAKING CHANGESwith a migration note - Date format
YYYY-MM-DD
When the repository already automates the CHANGELOG
If a tag push already generates the CHANGELOG, do not write it by hand. Review the generated release PR instead, then fix wording, missing breaking changes or migration notes there.
This repository is the reference implementation:
- Push a
v*tag. .github/workflows/release-prep.ymlruns.github/scripts/release-prep.sh <tag>.- The script diffs from the previous tag, groups commits by conventional prefix (
feat→ Added,fix→ Fixed,docs→ Documentation,chore/refactor/perf/test/ci/style→ Changed, the rest → Other), addsby @authorandin [#PR], prepends a## [<tag>] - datesection toCHANGELOG.md, and sets thepackage.jsonversion. - The workflow commits
CHANGELOG.mdandpackage.jsontochangelog/<tag>and opens a PR. - After the PR merges,
.github/workflows/release-publish.ymlpublishes to npm, attests provenance and creates the GitHub Release from the changelog section.
The devops role still owns the result: check the generated entry for user-visible wording, breaking changes and a migration note. Do not bump the version or edit CHANGELOG.md in a separate commit. If the project has no automation, write the CHANGELOG manually using the rules above.
3. CI/CD
Match the existing CI if there is one. If there is not, propose one, do not install one.
Pipeline steps (the order matters):
- Dependency install — deterministic with a lockfile (
npm ci) - Lint — fast, before writing code
- Type check —
tsc --noEmit/ mypy - Test — unit + integration
- Build — production output
- Deploy — only from the main branch, via a tag
Rule: the deploy step does not run automatically on the main branch. It runs via a tag or with manual approval. Publishing by accident is bad.
Secrets are not embedded in CI; provide them as environment secrets from the repo settings.
4. Deployment steps
Sequential and copyable. Each step: what, how, how it is verified.
# 1. Environment preparation
npm ci
# 2. Migration (must be reversible)
npx prisma migrate deploy
# verification: npx prisma migrate status → "up to date"
# 3. Build
npm run build
# 4. Deploy
# (platform command)
# 5. Health check
curl -fsS https://api.example.com/health
# expected: {"status":"ok","version":"1.1.0"}Migration order: it runs before the code deployment and must be backward compatible (that is, the old code must work with the new schema and the new code with the old schema). Otherwise it produces errors throughout the deployment window.
5. Environment variables
Never write the value. Only the name, type, description, requiredness.
| Variable | Type | Description | Required |
| DATABASE_URL | string | PostgreSQL connection string | yes |
| SESSION_SECRET | string | Session signing key (32+ bytes) | yes |
Write .env.example: variable names + description, values empty.
6. Rollback plan
A deployment is not considered complete without this section.
| Situation | Action | Time | Data loss |
| The new version fails the health check | Roll back to the previous version | 2 min | none |
| The migration ran, the application is broken | Roll back the migration + the previous version | 10 min | none (reversible schema) |
| The migration cannot be rolled back, data is corrupted | restore from backup | 30 min | the last write |
If you are making a change that cannot be rolled back, state this before the deployment and write a backup plan.
7. Monitoring
Minimum:
- Application error tracking (Sentry or equivalent) — stack trace + version + user context
- A health check endpoint (DB + critical dependency check)
- Structured logging (JSON, with a correlation ID)
- Basic uptime monitoring
Every log line should carry a request ID, otherwise debugging is impossible.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | The right way |
| Writing a secret into the config | Environment variable |
| Automatic deployment from the main branch | Tag + manual approval |
| Not writing a rollback plan | Mandatory section |
| Deploying without a health check | A /health endpoint |
| Running the migration after the deployment | Run it first, keep it backward compatible |
| Listing commits in the CHANGELOG | Write the behavior |
| Hand-writing a CHANGELOG when the tag workflow generates it | Review the generated release PR |
Output format
Markdown: Version and rationale / CHANGELOG (English) / CI/CD definition / Deployment steps / Environment variables / Rollback plan / Monitoring.
Explanations in the user's language (Turkish or English), CHANGELOG and commands in English.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

