rea
Skill3 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reverse engineer websites, shipped apps, JavaScript bundles and binaries with REA, backed by evidence. Use for /rea and exact interface reconstruction; not for ordinary source-code review.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mahik504/orchestra-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- imMamdouhaboammar/get-things-donetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- anton-abyzov/vskilltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- anton-abyzov/vskill★ 47same name
- imMamdouhaboammar/get-things-done★ 2same name
- juninmd/skills★ 2same name
- mahik504/orchestra-workflow★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository51 other files it gives its agents.
- guidelines/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- animate-expoSkill
- animateSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- apple-designSkill
- ask-sonnerSkill
- batch-grill-meSkill
- bi-dashboardsSkill
- bouw-loopSkill
- brandkitSkill
- code-auditSkill
- commit-disciplineSkill
- councilSkill
- createlooppromptSkill
- data-visualizationSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- dicht-loopSkill
- e2e-rulesSkill
- e2eSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- find-animation-opportunitiesSkill
- find-bugsSkill
- fixing-accessibilitySkill
- fix-loopSkill
- frontend-gotchasSkill
- goalSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- keten-loopSkill
- make-interfaces-feel-betterSkill
- mobile-nativeSkill
- office-docsSkill
- pick-ui-librarySkill
- polijst-loopSkill
- polpohire-designSkill
- pre-pr-gatesSkill
- projectstructuurSkill
- prototypeSkill
- readmeSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- render-proofSkill
- repo-hygieneSkill
- review-animationsSkill
- skill-finderSkill
- speur-loopSkill
- supergoalSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- theme-selectorSkill
- transitions-devSkill
- ux-heuristicsSkill
- waak-loopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use the local REA tool to investigate the target the user actually supplied.
- Distinctive: line 12
Read the bundled upstream workflow and only its relevant references.
- Distinctive: line 13
Prefer already-connected REA MCP tools and their current schemas.
- Very specific: line 15
Read <command> --help or --schema before supplying unfamiliar inputs.
- Distinctive: line 20
Read website workflow. Inventory public routes and delivered source before guessing implementation.
- Distinctive: line 32
Never submit contact forms, applications, bookings or outbound messages merely to inspect a site.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
REA: Reverse Engineer Anything
Use the local REA tool to investigate the target the user actually supplied. A reverse-engineering request produces findings and a reconstruction blueprint. Build a replica only when the user also asks for implementation. Do not confuse the REA repository with the app being investigated.
Start
- Read the bundled upstream workflow and only its relevant references. It covers binaries, packages, JavaScript, Android and passive runtime inspection.
- Prefer already-connected REA MCP tools and their current schemas. No startup diagnostics when working tools exist.
- Without MCP, use
scripts/run-rea.sh <command> ...relative to this skill. It prefers an installedrea, otherwise runs the verified npm release with npx. This works in Claude Code, Codex and Cursor without global MCP changes. - Read
<command> --helpor--schemabefore supplying unfamiliar inputs. Save complete--format json --full-outputoutput to a local evidence file; large output belongs in files, not chat. - Existing Node must satisfy the package requirements. Do not install or upgrade unrelated runtimes, native engines or global client settings as part of an investigation.
Websites and visual reconstruction
Read website workflow. Inventory public routes and delivered source before guessing implementation. Browser screenshots establish appearance; source establishes formulas and event logic; runtime actions establish behavior. Keep these evidence types separate.
For a complete-site request, capture all discovered public routes and page families, exact design tokens, fonts, assets, responsive rules, motion, navigation, demos, calculators, filtering, consent and form boundaries. List gaps rather than calling inaccessible server code reconstructed. Local source acquisition is analysis; it is not a production clone.
Connection setup only when requested or necessary
Read local clients. Plan MCP configuration changes with REA's dry-run first; preserve unrelated config and inspect the plan before applying the authorized client scope. Registering tools does not make them appear in a running session: restart/reconnect the client. A CLI fallback can continue useful work immediately.
Evidence and completion
- Preserve URL/path, effective URL, timestamps, SHA-256 and REA Evidence IDs. Distinguish observed, derived, inferred and unknown.
- A advertised live agent, demo or calculator may be a fixed client-side simulation. Trace the event handler and actual data source, then verify one meaningful branch in the browser.
- Never submit contact forms, applications, bookings or outbound messages merely to inspect a site. Document an observed form's request contract; a sending test needs its own task scope.
- Finish with the deliverable, actual checks and material gaps. Match the user's requested response length; a thorough local dossier can accompany a short chat answer.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

