agentleFS
robinbrilrobinbril/claude-code-harness/skills/rea/SKILL.md

rea

Skill3 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Reverse engineer websites, shipped apps, JavaScript bundles and binaries with REA, backed by evidence. Use for /rea and exact interface reconstruction; not for ordinary source-code review.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the local REA tool to investigate the target the user actually supplied.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the bundled upstream workflow and only its relevant references.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer already-connected REA MCP tools and their current schemas.

    line 13
  4. Very specific:

    Read <command> --help or --schema before supplying unfamiliar inputs.

    line 15
  5. Distinctive:

    Read website workflow. Inventory public routes and delivered source before guessing implementation.

    line 20
  6. Distinctive:

    Never submit contact forms, applications, bookings or outbound messages merely to inspect a site.

    line 32

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

REA: Reverse Engineer Anything

Use the local REA tool to investigate the target the user actually supplied. A reverse-engineering request produces findings and a reconstruction blueprint. Build a replica only when the user also asks for implementation. Do not confuse the REA repository with the app being investigated.

Start

  • Read the bundled upstream workflow and only its relevant references. It covers binaries, packages, JavaScript, Android and passive runtime inspection.
  • Prefer already-connected REA MCP tools and their current schemas. No startup diagnostics when working tools exist.
  • Without MCP, use scripts/run-rea.sh <command> ... relative to this skill. It prefers an installed rea, otherwise runs the verified npm release with npx. This works in Claude Code, Codex and Cursor without global MCP changes.
  • Read <command> --help or --schema before supplying unfamiliar inputs. Save complete --format json --full-output output to a local evidence file; large output belongs in files, not chat.
  • Existing Node must satisfy the package requirements. Do not install or upgrade unrelated runtimes, native engines or global client settings as part of an investigation.

Websites and visual reconstruction

Read website workflow. Inventory public routes and delivered source before guessing implementation. Browser screenshots establish appearance; source establishes formulas and event logic; runtime actions establish behavior. Keep these evidence types separate.

For a complete-site request, capture all discovered public routes and page families, exact design tokens, fonts, assets, responsive rules, motion, navigation, demos, calculators, filtering, consent and form boundaries. List gaps rather than calling inaccessible server code reconstructed. Local source acquisition is analysis; it is not a production clone.

Connection setup only when requested or necessary

Read local clients. Plan MCP configuration changes with REA's dry-run first; preserve unrelated config and inspect the plan before applying the authorized client scope. Registering tools does not make them appear in a running session: restart/reconnect the client. A CLI fallback can continue useful work immediately.

Evidence and completion

  • Preserve URL/path, effective URL, timestamps, SHA-256 and REA Evidence IDs. Distinguish observed, derived, inferred and unknown.
  • A advertised live agent, demo or calculator may be a fixed client-side simulation. Trace the event handler and actual data source, then verify one meaningful branch in the browser.
  • Never submit contact forms, applications, bookings or outbound messages merely to inspect a site. Document an observed form's request contract; a sending test needs its own task scope.
  • Finish with the deliverable, actual checks and material gaps. Match the user's requested response length; a thorough local dossier can accompany a short chat answer.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.