book-ideation
Skill118 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Transform raw ideas into structured nonfiction book concepts through guided multi-session development. Every decision serves the reader. The question is never "what do I want to say?" but "what transformation does the reader need, and how can this book deliver it?" This skill sits between generic brainstorming and book architecture. Its job is to refine raw material into a structured concept that can be validated, market-tested, and architected. The goal is not a book outline. The goal is clarity on…
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- epicsagas/Veliththeir own version, first seen Sep 4, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- epicsagas/Velith★ 40same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skill-creatorSkill
- app-store-opportunity-researchSkill
- brainstormSkill
- ebook-concept-developmentSkill
- ebook-discoverySkill
- handoffSkill
- leadSkill
- book-architectSkill
- book-idea-validatorSkill
- book-market-researchSkill
- book-research-assistantSkill
- chapter-architectSkill
- project-wikiSkill
- ghost-writerSkill
- writing-dna-discoverySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
If continuing: Request the latest Book Concept Document version
- Distinctive: line 53
If new: Proceed to initialization
- Distinctive: line 56
Ask user to share their raw material (brainstorm doc, notes, idea)
- Distinctive: line 57
Read and identify what's already clear vs.
- Distinctive: line 143
Don't list 20 ideas. Force prioritization.
- Distinctive: line 149
Every great nonfiction book has a villain:
- Distinctive: line 184
Use the "Ideal Reader Interview" technique (imagine interviewing your reader)
- Distinctive: line 203
Create minimal v1 document
- Very specific: line 223
Use the template at assets/templates/book-concept-template.md for all Book Concept Documents.
- Distinctive: line 228
All eight elements with current development status
- Very specific: line 235
When discussing Key Concepts, it often helps to preview potential book structures.
- Distinctive: line 242
When the Book Concept Document is ready:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Book Ideation
Transform raw ideas into structured nonfiction book concepts through guided multi-session development.
Core Philosophy
Every decision serves the reader. The question is never "what do I want to say?" but "what transformation does the reader need, and how can this book deliver it?"
This skill sits between generic brainstorming and book architecture. Its job is to refine raw material into a structured concept that can be validated, market-tested, and architected.
The goal is not a book outline. The goal is clarity on eight fundamental elements that determine whether a book should exist and what it must accomplish.
Input Types
This skill accepts:
- Raw idea (one sentence or paragraph)
- Brainstorm document from the
brainstormskill - Zettelkasten notes or research collection
- Existing partial concept needing refinement
- "Shower thought" worth exploring
Session Flow
Session Start
Begin every session with:
- New or continuing?
- If continuing: Request the latest Book Concept Document version
- If new: Proceed to initialization
- What do we have?
- Ask user to share their raw material (brainstorm doc, notes, idea)
- Read and identify what's already clear vs. underdeveloped
- Session goal
- Which elements need development today?
- Deep exploration or quick progress?
The Eight Elements
Develop these through conversation, not interrogation. Surface insights; don't extract data.
1. The Reader
Who specifically is this for?
Go beyond demographics. Understand:
- Their current situation (what's happening in their life/work)
- What they currently believe that isn't serving them
- What they've already tried that hasn't worked
- What's blocking them from solving this themselves
- Why they would pick up THIS book (the trigger moment)
Probe: "If your ideal reader walked into a bookstore, what section would they be in? What would they be feeling? What search would they have just done on Amazon?"
2. The Transformation
Where will they be after reading?
The reader starts at Point A and ends at Point B. Define both clearly:
- What will they believe differently?
- What will they be able to do?
- How will they feel?
- What will they stop doing?
The gap between A and B is the book's reason for existence.
3. The Core Thesis
What's the one big idea?
This is not a topic—it's a claim. A thesis takes a position. Test it:
- Can someone disagree with this? (If not, it's too obvious)
- Does it challenge conventional wisdom? (Contrarian theses are more compelling)
- Can you state it in one sentence?
Template: "Most people believe [conventional wisdom], but actually [your thesis], because [key insight]."
4. The Author Angle
Why are you the one to write this?
Credibility comes from:
- Experience (you've lived this)
- Expertise (you've studied/practiced this)
- Access (you have information others don't)
- Perspective (you see what others miss)
You don't need all four. You need at least one that's compelling.
5. The Stakes
Why does this matter? Why now?
Articulate:
- What's the cost of NOT reading this book?
- Why is this moment in time right for this message?
- What's at risk for the reader if they continue as they are?
Stakes create urgency. Without stakes, the book is a "nice to have."
6. The Key Concepts
What are the 3-7 major ideas that support the thesis?
These are the building blocks—the frameworks, principles, stories, or insights that make the thesis credible and actionable. They'll become chapters or sections.
Don't list 20 ideas. Force prioritization. What's essential vs. nice-to-have?
7. The Enemy
What is this book arguing against?
Every great nonfiction book has a villain:
- A mindset ("hustle culture")
- A practice ("inbox zero")
- Conventional wisdom ("more information = better decisions")
- A competing approach ("digital note-taking")
The enemy clarifies the thesis by contrast.
8. The Promise
In one sentence, what does the reader get?
This is the book's value proposition. It should:
- Be specific (not "improve your life")
- Be believable (not "become a millionaire in 30 days")
- Connect transformation to method
Template: "This book will help [reader] achieve [transformation] by [method/insight]."
During Session
Collaboration behaviors:
- Surface what's implicit: "It sounds like you're really saying..."
- Challenge weak elements: "I'm not convinced this thesis is contrarian enough. Here's why..."
- Connect elements: "Your enemy suggests your reader might be someone who..."
- Push for specificity: "Can you give me an example of this reader?"
When stuck on an element:
- Skip it and return later (other elements may clarify it)
- Use the "Ideal Reader Interview" technique (imagine interviewing your reader)
- Try the "Anti-Book" technique (what's the opposite book? who's it for?)
Session End
Always conclude with:
- Element status — Which elements are solid, developing, or still raw?
- Key insight — What did we discover this session?
- Overnight question — What should the user sit with?
- Version creation — Generate the next version of the Book Concept Document
Quick Capture Mode
For rapid concept capture when time is short:
- User shares raw idea
- Extract: Reader (rough), Transformation (rough), Thesis (rough), Promise (one sentence)
- Create minimal v1 document
- Note: "Quick capture—expand in future session"
Readiness Criteria
A Book Concept Document is ready for validation when:
| Element | Readiness Test |
| Reader | Can describe them as a specific person, not a category |
| Transformation | Clear before/after with emotional and practical dimensions |
| Thesis | One sentence, contrarian, defensible |
| Author Angle | At least one compelling credibility source |
| Stakes | Urgency is clear—reader feels cost of inaction |
| Key Concepts | 3-7 prioritized, each clearly supporting the thesis |
| Enemy | Named and specific |
| Promise | One sentence that a reader would find compelling |
Output
Use the template at assets/templates/book-concept-template.md for all Book
Concept Documents.
The document is versioned (v1, v2, etc.) and includes:
- All eight elements with current development status
- Session log tracking progress
- Open questions for future sessions
- Readiness assessment for downstream skills
Structural Frameworks Reference
When discussing Key Concepts, it often helps to preview potential book
structures. See references/nonfiction-frameworks.md for framework options to
share with the user. This is for orientation only—structural decisions belong to
book-architect.
Handoff to Downstream Skills
When the Book Concept Document is ready:
→ idea-validator: Will stress-test the thesis and key concepts against existing research → market-research: Will assess KDP viability, competition, and positioning → book-architect: Will use reader/transformation/key concepts to design the structure
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

