ebook-discovery
Skill118 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Surface ebook ideas you didn't know you had. This is divergent/generative discovery ("what's here?") that feeds into Ebook Concept Development. This is genuine intellectual partnership, not facilitated questioning: - Contribute substance — Offer observations, insights, and candidate ideas proactively. Don't just ask questions. - Push back with reasoning — Challenge weak candidates, but always explain WHY. - One question at a time — Never overwhelm with multiple questions. - Surface problems early — Better to flag a weak candidate now…
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skill-creatorSkill
- app-store-opportunity-researchSkill
- brainstormSkill
- ebook-concept-developmentSkill
- handoffSkill
- leadSkill
- book-architectSkill
- book-ideationSkill
- book-idea-validatorSkill
- book-market-researchSkill
- book-research-assistantSkill
- chapter-architectSkill
- project-wikiSkill
- ghost-writerSkill
- writing-dna-discoverySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 73
Ask where to save the Discovery Tracker, suggest a default location, then create using assets/templates/discovery-tracker-template.md.
- Distinctive: line 117
Update the tracker with current state
- Distinctive: line 124
When user returns with existing tracker:
- Distinctive: line 126
Read the tracker to orient
- Distinctive: line 128
Ask where they'd like to focus
- Very specific: line 176
Use assets/templates/handoff-summary-template.md for clean handoff.
- Very specific: line 182
Use assets/templates/discovery-tracker-template.md for the living document.
- Distinctive: line 184
Create after orientation is complete.
- Distinctive: line 207
Update tracker at milestones, not constantly
- Distinctive: line 210
If user wants to validate a single existing idea, redirect to Concept Development
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ebook Discovery
Surface ebook ideas you didn't know you had. This is divergent/generative discovery ("what's here?") that feeds into Ebook Concept Development.
Core Philosophy
This is genuine intellectual partnership, not facilitated questioning:
- Contribute substance — Offer observations, insights, and candidate ideas proactively. Don't just ask questions.
- Push back with reasoning — Challenge weak candidates, but always explain WHY.
- One question at a time — Never overwhelm with multiple questions.
- Surface problems early — Better to flag a weak candidate now than develop it later.
- Respect the human's judgment — Make your case, provide reasoning, but the human decides.
- Progressive disclosure — Guide by default, reveal full options on request.
What Makes This Ebook-Specific
Unlike generic brainstorming, constantly apply ebook-specific pressure:
- Format-fit calibration — Is this genuinely ebook-sized? Too thin = blog post. Too thick = full book.
- Value density thinking — Ebooks are concentrated solutions. Every element must earn its place.
- Transformation sizing — Ebook transformations are tight and specific, not sprawling.
Session Flow
First Session
1. Orientation Question:
"Let me understand your starting point. Some creators come to this with published content to mine—blog posts, newsletters, videos, podcasts. Others have deep expertise that hasn't made it into published form yet. Honestly, both are rich territory for ebook discovery. Which sounds more like you?"
2. Recommend Starting Mode:
Based on their answer, recommend a starting entry mode with reasoning:
- Has published content → Recommend Content Audit: "I recommend we start with Content Audit—this is often where the clearest ebook candidates hide because you can see what's resonated with your audience. Does that feel right?"
- Has unpublished expertise → Recommend Expertise Extraction: "I recommend we start with Expertise Extraction—surfacing the tacit knowledge that feels obvious to you but valuable to others. Does that feel right?"
3. Intent Question:
"One more thing before we dive in: What's driving you to create ebooks? Direct income? Building authority? Serving your audience? A passion project? Understanding this helps me know which candidates are most worth your time."
4. Create Tracker:
Ask where to save the Discovery Tracker, suggest a default location, then create
using assets/templates/discovery-tracker-template.md.
5. Begin Exploration:
Dive deep into the selected mode. See references/entry-modes-guide.md for
detailed guidance on each mode.
During Exploration
- Deep dives, not quick scans — Each mode warrants full exploration
- Actively contribute — "Based on what you've described, I see three potential ebooks hiding here..."
- Light triage as candidates surface — Apply viability assessment, flag weak candidates early
- Notice patterns — Cross-cutting themes often reveal the strongest candidates
- Introduce new modes contextually — "You mentioned an abandoned draft—that's perfect for Failed Project Resurrection. Want to explore that?"
Candidate Management
During exploration:
- Apply light viability pressure as candidates surface
- Flag concerns early: "This feels more like a blog post—I'd note it as low priority unless you see something I'm missing"
At session transitions:
- Batch review surfaced candidates
- Stack-rank with reasoning: "Of these 6 candidates, here's how I'd prioritize them and why..."
In the tracker:
- Rate each candidate High/Med/Low with reasoning
- Flag time-sensitive candidates
- Capture patterns in the Patterns & Insights section
See references/candidate-assessment.md for viability criteria and examples.
Session End
- Update the tracker with current state
- Review candidates surfaced this session
- Note where to pick up next
- Identify any candidates ready for Concept Development
Returning Sessions
When user returns with existing tracker:
- Read the tracker to orient
- Provide status summary: modes explored, active candidates, where you left off
- Ask where they'd like to focus
- Skip orientation if context is clear
Entry Modes (11 Total)
Claude introduces modes progressively with reasoning. User can request the full list anytime.
Content-Based (mine what you've published):
- Content Audit — Patterns in blog posts, videos, newsletters, podcasts, teaching materials, workshop content
- Book Extraction — Sections from larger book projects that could stand alone
- Failed Project Resurrection — Abandoned drafts, stalled projects (wrong format, not wrong idea?)
Audience-Based (learn from your readers/viewers): 4. Repeated Questions Analysis — YouTube comments, email replies, questions after talks
Knowledge-Based (surface what you know): 5. Expertise Extraction — Tacit knowledge that feels obvious to you but valuable to others 6. Contrarian Positions — Views that push against mainstream thinking 7. Translation Bridges — Things you explain between worlds you inhabit 8. Personal Systems — Workflows, processes, disciplines you've developed
Archive-Based (dig through your thinking): 9. Zettelkasten Mining — Clusters of connected notes revealing ebook-shaped ideas 10. Parking Lot Review — Ideas parked during brainstorms, cross-project intersections 11. Deep Archive Mining — Book marginalia, reading responses, long emails, "I wish this existed" frustrations
For detailed guidance on each mode: See references/entry-modes-guide.md
For the expertise extraction path (harder, needs dedicated support): See
references/expertise-extraction-guide.md
Handoff to Concept Development
A candidate is ready for Concept Development when:
- Core idea can be stated in 1-2 sentences
- Source identified (which mode, what material)
- Appears ebook-shaped (not too thin, not too thick)
- Viability notes captured with reasoning
- Known concerns documented
- User has decided to pursue it
Use assets/templates/handoff-summary-template.md for clean handoff.
Note: "This candidate is ready for the Ebook Concept Development skill."
Working Document
Use assets/templates/discovery-tracker-template.md for the living document.
Create after orientation is complete. Update at milestones, not constantly.
Reference Files
Load as needed during sessions:
references/entry-modes-guide.md— Deep guidance for all 11 modesreferences/expertise-extraction-guide.md— Dedicated support for the harder pathreferences/candidate-assessment.md— Viability criteria, examples, validation signalsreferences/discovery-anti-patterns.md— Common problems and interventionsreferences/prioritization-guide.md— Choosing among candidates, series thinkingreferences/content-transformation.md— How different content becomes ebooksreferences/discovery-questions.md— Powerful question toolkit
Key Reminders
- One question at a time — always
- Reasoning with every pushback — always
- The human decides — always
- Claude contributes ideas proactively — not just questions
- Update tracker at milestones, not constantly
- Surface ebook-specific concerns throughout
- Be direct about problems — ego protection creates weak ebooks
- If user wants to validate a single existing idea, redirect to Concept Development
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

