weekly-digest
Skill36 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Automated weekly summary of what changed in your product — top frustrations, new errors, trends up/down, conversion changes. Use when asking "what changed this week", "give me the weekly recap", or "what's new since last week.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aryaminus/socials-assistanttheir own version, first seen Aug 23, 2026
- glebis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 1, 2026
- JAVICHILEON/claude---Skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 1, 2026
- chengkj99/kj-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 26, 2026
- aiflaredev/aiflaretheir own version, first seen May 16, 2026
- composio-community/support-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 10, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- glebis/claude-skills★ 410same name
- composio-community/support-skills★ 18same name
- chengkj99/kj-skills★ 14same name
- aiflaredev/aiflare★ 0same name
- aryaminus/socials-assistant★ 0same name
- JAVICHILEON/claude---Skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-analyzerSkill
- annotation-opsSkill
- anomaly-detectorSkill
- api-monitorSkill
- benchmark-analyzerSkill
- campaign-trackerSkill
- changelog-detectiveSkill
- cohort-compassSkill
- comparisonsSkill
- customer-360Skill
- dashboard-builderSkill
- deploy-radarSkill
- error-forensicsSkill
- experiment-analyzerSkill
- feature-adoptionSkill
- form-analyzerSkill
- frustration-hunterSkill
- funnel-doctorSkill
- general-analysisSkill
- heatmap-generatorSkill
- incident-responderSkill
- jira-bug-reporterSkill
- journey-builderSkill
- lifecycle-analyzerSkill
- metric-auditorSkill
- mobile-analyzerSkill
- nps-proxySkill
- onboarding-tutorSkill
- page-performanceSkill
- persona-builderSkill
- predictive-alertsSkill
- privacy-auditorSkill
- query-translatorSkill
- quick-statsSkill
- report-deckSkill
- retention-analyzerSkill
- revenue-impactSkill
- scroll-depth-analyzerSkill
- segment-wizardSkill
- session-playlistSkill
- session-reviewSkill
- session-searchSkill
- slack-reporterSkill
- user-journeySkill
- webhook-healthSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
Use free fullstory:discover_groups and fullstory:get_opportunity_stats for live signals.
- Very specific: line 34
Call fullstory:discover_groups(compare_to_previous=true).
- Distinctive: line 115
Default comparison: this week vs last week.
- Distinctive: line 116
If a metric doesn't exist yet, build it — but note that next week's digest will be faster since it can reuse the metric.
- Distinctive: line 118
If everything is stable, say so: "No significant changes this week.
- Very specific: line 119
Always surface metric_url for each metric so the user can verify in the UI.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Weekly Digest
A structured weekly summary of what changed in your product: frustrations, errors, conversion trends, and notable shifts.
When to Use
- "What changed this week vs last week?"
- "Give me a weekly recap of product health"
- "What should I put in the weekly product update?"
- "Anything trending sharply up or down this week?"
- "What new errors appeared this week?"
Mental Model
The digest compares two time periods — typically "this week" vs "last week" — across four dimensions:
- Frustration signals — rage clicks, dead clicks, form abandonment
- Errors — console errors, network failures, crashes
- Conversion — key funnel metrics
- Traffic — overall page views and session count
The output is a structured report, not a deep investigation. Flag what's worth digging into; the user can then invoke the specific skill (frustration-hunter, error-forensics, funnel-doctor) for the things that matter.
Use free fullstory:discover_groups and fullstory:get_opportunity_stats for live signals. Discovery accepts one scope at a time (page_id, domain, app_name, segment_id, or funnel_id); use a segment for device/user filters and the live schema for time ranges. Use computed metrics for exact custom windows.
Workflow
Step 1: Frustrations
Call fullstory:discover_groups(compare_to_previous=true). Compare to prior 7 days.
For each opportunity, call fullstory:get_opportunity_stats. Flag anything with:
- User count increase >20% week-over-week
- New signal that didn't exist last week
- Frustration rate significantly above site average
Present top 3-5 as a ranked list with week-over-week change.
Step 2: Errors
Build a metric for errors (console errors, network failures):
fullstory:build_metric(
query="console errors and network failures",
output_type="trend"
)
fullstory:compute_metric(metric_id, time_range="last_14_days")Flag:
- Errors that started this week (zero last week, non-zero now)
- Errors with >50% increase week-over-week
- Most frequent error overall
Step 3: Conversion
Pick 2-3 key funnels (checkout, signup, onboarding). If they don't exist in the account, ask the user which funnels matter. Build a trend metric for each:
fullstory:compute_metric(funnel_metric_id, time_range="last_14_days")Flag any funnel with >10% drop in completion rate week-over-week.
Step 4: Traffic
Quick sanity check — is the site getting more or less traffic?
fullstory:build_metric(query="page views", output_type="trend")
fullstory:compute_metric(metric_id, time_range="last_14_days")Step 5: Assemble the digest
Format:
## Weekly Digest — August 1–7, 2026
### Frustrations
- Rage clicks on "Apply Promo Code": 412 users (+23% vs last week) 🔴
- Dead clicks on cart icon: 287 users (+12%)
- Form abandonment at password: 218 users (-8%) 🟢
### Errors
- TypeError on /dashboard: NEW — 89 users this week 🔴
- 504 on /api/orders: 156 users (+5%)
- Console error on /settings: resolved (0 users this week) ✅
### Conversion
- Checkout completion: 18% (down from 22% last week) 🔴
- Signup completion: 64% (stable)
- Onboarding completion: 45% (up from 41%) 🟢
### Traffic
- 1.2M page views (+3% week-over-week)
- 89K sessions (+2%)
### Worth investigating
1. Promo code rage clicks are up 23% — run frustration-hunter
2. New TypeError on /dashboard — run error-forensics
3. Checkout conversion dropped 4 points — run funnel-doctorStep 6: Offer next steps
For each "worth investigating" item, offer to run the relevant deep-dive skill. Let the user pick what matters most.
Guidelines
- The digest is a status report, not an investigation. Don't pull session transcripts unless the user asks.
- Default comparison: this week vs last week. Ask if they want a different window.
- If a metric doesn't exist yet, build it — but note that next week's digest will be faster since it can reuse the metric.
- Green (🟢) = improving, red (🔴) = worsening, no emoji = stable.
- If everything is stable, say so: "No significant changes this week. Site health is steady."
- Always surface
metric_urlfor each metric so the user can verify in the UI.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

