feature-adoption
Skill36 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Track feature adoption — who's using the new feature, how deeply, are they sticking with it, and what's blocking adoption. Use when launching a new feature, measuring feature engagement, or understanding feature usage patterns.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SkeneTechnologies/plg-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- SkeneTechnologies/plg-skills★ 19same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-analyzerSkill
- annotation-opsSkill
- anomaly-detectorSkill
- api-monitorSkill
- benchmark-analyzerSkill
- campaign-trackerSkill
- changelog-detectiveSkill
- cohort-compassSkill
- comparisonsSkill
- customer-360Skill
- dashboard-builderSkill
- deploy-radarSkill
- error-forensicsSkill
- experiment-analyzerSkill
- form-analyzerSkill
- frustration-hunterSkill
- funnel-doctorSkill
- general-analysisSkill
- heatmap-generatorSkill
- incident-responderSkill
- jira-bug-reporterSkill
- journey-builderSkill
- lifecycle-analyzerSkill
- metric-auditorSkill
- mobile-analyzerSkill
- nps-proxySkill
- onboarding-tutorSkill
- page-performanceSkill
- persona-builderSkill
- predictive-alertsSkill
- privacy-auditorSkill
- query-translatorSkill
- quick-statsSkill
- report-deckSkill
- retention-analyzerSkill
- revenue-impactSkill
- scroll-depth-analyzerSkill
- segment-wizardSkill
- session-playlistSkill
- session-reviewSkill
- session-searchSkill
- slack-reporterSkill
- user-journeySkill
- webhook-healthSkill
- weekly-digestSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
If this number is low, the problem is discovery, not the feature itself.
- Distinctive: line 145
Always compare feature adoption across user segments — the overall number hides important patterns.
- Distinctive: line 147
If the feature is gated (enterprise-only, beta), adjust expectations — adoption will be lower and that's normal.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature Adoption
Track how users adopt new features — who's using it, how deeply, are they coming back, and what's preventing adoption.
When to Use
- "How many users have tried the new dashboard?"
- "Are users who tried the new search feature coming back to it?"
- "What's blocking adoption of the new onboarding flow?"
- "Compare feature usage between enterprise and free users"
- "Is the new feature replacing the old one, or are users using both?"
- "Show me sessions where users started using the new feature but stopped"
Mental Model
Feature adoption is a funnel:
- Awareness: Users who saw the feature (visited the page, saw the announcement)
- Trial: Users who tried it (clicked on it, interacted once)
- Adoption: Users who used it repeatedly (came back, integrated into workflow)
- Retention: Users who are still using it N days later
The drop-off between each stage tells you where the problem is.
Workflow
Step 1: Define the feature
Clarify what "using the feature" means:
- A page visit? (e.g., visited /dashboard/new)
- A click event? (e.g., clicked "New Report" button)
- A custom event? (e.g.,
feature_search_v2_used) - A sequence? (e.g., visited /search → typed query → clicked result)
Step 2: Measure awareness
How many users encountered the feature?
fullstory:build_metric(
query="users who visited /dashboard/new",
output_type="single_number"
)If this number is low, the problem is discovery, not the feature itself.
Step 3: Measure trial
Of those who were aware, how many tried it?
fullstory:build_metric(
query="users who interacted with the new dashboard (clicked any element or spent >10 seconds)",
output_type="single_number"
)Trial rate = trial users / aware users. Low trial rate = the feature doesn't look compelling or its purpose isn't clear.
Step 4: Measure adoption (repeat usage)
Of those who tried it, how many came back?
fullstory:build_segment("users who used new dashboard at least once")
fullstory:build_metric(query="sessions with new dashboard usage per user in last 30 days", output_type="top_n")
→ "60% used it once, 25% used it 2-3 times, 15% used it 4+ times"The "used once and never returned" group is the most important to investigate.
Step 5: Segment adoption
Break down by user properties:
By plan:
Enterprise: 42% adoption
Free: 8% adoption ← BIG GAP
By onboarding:
Completed onboarding: 35% adoption
Skipped onboarding: 5% adoptionA big gap between segments tells you where to focus adoption efforts.
Step 6: Investigate blockers
For users who tried but didn't adopt:
fullstory:build_segment("users who used new dashboard exactly once in last 30 days")
fullstory:get_sessions(segment_id, limit=5)
→ session-context agent: "What did the user do on the new dashboard? Did they encounter errors, confusion, or dead clicks? Why didn't they return?"Look for:
- Errors or crashes during first use
- Rage clicks or dead clicks (confusing UI)
- Users switching back to the old feature immediately after trying the new one
- Users spending very little time (they bounced immediately)
Step 7: Report
## Feature Adoption — New Dashboard (launched Jul 15, 30 days)
### Adoption Funnel
- Aware: 8,200 users (visited /dashboard/new)
- Tried: 3,400 users (41% trial rate)
- Adopted: 1,100 users (32% of trial users, 2+ sessions with feature)
- Retained: 780 users (71% of adopters still using in Week 4)
### Drop-off Analysis
- Biggest drop: Trial → Adoption (68% tried once and never returned)
- These 2,300 users need investigation — run frustration-hunter on /dashboard/new
### By Segment
- Enterprise: 42% adoption | Free: 8% adoption
- Feature isn't reaching free users — consider in-app promotion or gating
### Comparison to Old Dashboard
- Old dashboard still has 5,200 active users
- 1,800 users use both (transitioning slowly)
- 600 users tried the new one, went back exclusively to the old one
### Recommendations
1. Investigate why 68% of trial users don't return (session evidence needed)
2. Promote the new dashboard to free users — they're not discovering it
3. Consider sunset timeline for old dashboard once adoption hits 60%Feature Lifecycle Stages
| Stage | Metric | Healthy Range |
| Launch week | Trial rate | >25% of users who see it |
| Month 1 | Adoption rate | >20% of trial users return |
| Month 2 | Retention | >50% of adopters still active |
| Month 3 | Cannibalization | New feature usage > old feature usage |
| Month 6 | Default | New feature is the primary path for >80% of users |
Guidelines
- Always compare feature adoption across user segments — the overall number hides important patterns.
- "Tried once, never returned" is the single most important group to investigate. That's where the UX problems live.
- If the feature is gated (enterprise-only, beta), adjust expectations — adoption will be lower and that's normal.
- Old feature usage is a key metric. If nobody switches, the new feature isn't solving a real problem (or migration is too hard).
- Custom events are the most reliable way to track feature usage. If your team fires a
feature_X_usedevent, use that instead of page visits or click patterns.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

