agentleFS
reatlatreatlat/fullstory-claude-plugin/skills/nps-proxy/SKILL.md

nps-proxy

Skill36 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Behavioral proxy for user satisfaction — use frustration signals, engagement patterns, and conversion behavior as a real-time NPS alternative. Use when the user wants to measure satisfaction but doesn't have survey data in Fullstory.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No frustration events in any session

    line 40
  2. Distinctive:

    Always caveat: "This is a behavioral proxy, not a survey." Repeat it in every report.

    line 144
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't compare your proxy score to industry NPS benchmarks.

    line 147
  4. Distinctive:

    If you DO have survey data (NPS, CSAT, CES), correlate it with the behavioral proxy.

    line 148

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

NPS Proxy

Measure user satisfaction from behavior when you don't have survey data — frustration signals, engagement patterns, and conversion behavior as a real-time proxy for how users feel.

When to Use

  • "What's our user satisfaction looking like?"
  • "We don't run NPS surveys — can Fullstory give us a satisfaction signal?"
  • "Which users are likely promoters vs detractors based on behavior?"
  • "Did satisfaction improve after the redesign?"
  • "Show me our 'frustration score' trend over time"

Mental Model

NPS (Net Promoter Score) asks users: "How likely are you to recommend us?" Fullstory doesn't do surveys. But you can build a behavioral proxy from three signals:

  1. Success signals (promoters): Completed key tasks, returned multiple times, used advanced features, high engagement
  2. Frustration signals (detractors): Rage clicks, dead clicks, errors, form abandonment, one-and-done sessions
  3. Engagement signals (passives): Consistent but shallow usage, moderate session frequency, no strong positive or negative signals

The ratio of success to frustration signals gives you a directional satisfaction measure. It's not a survey. It's a behavioral proxy. Treat it accordingly.

Workflow

Step 1: Define success and frustration signals

Work with the user to define what "happy" and "unhappy" look like in their product:

Success signals (any 2+ = likely satisfied):

  • Completed a purchase, signup, or key conversion
  • Used the product 3+ times in 30 days
  • Session duration >5 minutes (engaged, not bouncing)
  • Used advanced features (beyond basics)
  • Returned after first session (retained)
  • No frustration events in any session

Frustration signals (any 1 = likely unsatisfied):

  • Rage clicked any element
  • Dead clicked any element
  • Hit a console error or network failure
  • Abandoned a form mid-completion
  • Bounced after 1 page view (<10 seconds)
  • Visited help/support pages repeatedly

Step 2: Build satisfaction segments

fullstory:build_segment("users with at least 2 success signals and 0 frustration signals in last 30 days") → promoters
fullstory:build_segment("users with at least 1 frustration signal in last 30 days") → detractors
fullstory:build_segment("users with neither strong success nor frustration signals in last 30 days") → passives

Step 3: Compute the proxy score

fullstory:build_metric(query="unique users", output_type="single_number")
→ compute for promoters segment → 4,200
→ compute for detractors segment → 1,800
→ compute for passives segment → 6,400

Behavioral Proxy Score = % Promoters - % Detractors
= (4,200/12,400) - (1,800/12,400)
= 33.9% - 14.5%
= +19.4

Step 4: Present with caveats

## Behavioral Satisfaction Proxy — Last 30 Days

### Signal Distribution
- Promoters (2+ success, 0 frustration): 4,200 (33.9%) ✅
- Passives (neither strong positive nor negative): 6,400 (51.6%) 
- Detractors (1+ frustration): 1,800 (14.5%) 🔴

### Proxy Score: +19.4
(A positive score means more promoters than detractors. The theoretical range is -100 to +100.)

### What This Means
About 1 in 3 users show strong satisfaction signals — they're completing tasks, returning, and not hitting frustration. About 1 in 7 users show frustration — they're rage-clicking, hitting errors, or abandoning.

### Top Frustration Drivers
1. Rage clicks on "Apply Promo": 412 users (the biggest detractor driver)
2. Checkout form abandonment: 340 users
3. Console errors on /dashboard: 89 users

### Trend
- This month: +19.4
- Last month: +17.2
- Improvement: +2.2 points 🟢
→ Frustration is decreasing, satisfaction trending up

### ⚠️ Important Caveat
This is a behavioral proxy, NOT an NPS survey. It measures what users DO, not what they SAY. Some frustrated users might still recommend you. Some happy users might not. Use as a directional signal, not a precise metric.

Step 5: Segment the score

Break down by user properties to find where satisfaction lives:

By plan:
Enterprise: +42 (high satisfaction — they get value)
Free: +8 (mediocre — some get value, many don't)

By device:
Desktop: +24
Mobile: +8 (mobile users are twice as frustrated)
→ Mobile UX is dragging down overall satisfaction.

By acquisition:
Organic: +28
Paid ads: +4 (paid users are less satisfied — possible expectation mismatch)

Step 6: Track over time

Build a trend of the proxy score:

fullstory:build_metric(query="unique users", output_type="trend")
→ compute for promoters, detractors, and passives over time
→ plot: proxy score over the last 6 months
→ annotate key events (deploys, feature launches, campaigns)

Behavioral NPS by Product Type

Product TypeStrong Success SignalStrong Frustration Signal
E-commerceCompleted purchaseCheckout abandonment, payment error
SaaSUsed 3+ features, returned weeklyRage clicks on core workflow, form abandonment
Content/MediaRead 3+ articles, returned within 7 daysBounced after <10s, dead clicks on nav
MarketplaceCompleted transaction, messaged sellerSearch with no results, dead clicks on listings
B2B/EnterpriseMultiple team members active, used admin featuresPermission errors, feature access denied

Guidelines

  • Always caveat: "This is a behavioral proxy, not a survey." Repeat it in every report. Don't let anyone mistake this for real NPS.
  • The proxy is most useful as a trend. A single month's score (+19.4) is less meaningful than "up from +17.2 last month." Track direction, not absolute value.
  • Frustration signals are more reliable than success signals. A rage click definitely means frustration. A completed purchase might mean satisfaction, or it might mean "I needed this and powered through a bad experience." Weight frustration signals higher.
  • Don't compare your proxy score to industry NPS benchmarks. An NPS of +40 is "excellent." A behavioral proxy of +40 means something completely different. They're different scales.
  • If you DO have survey data (NPS, CSAT, CES), correlate it with the behavioral proxy. You might find that session rage clicks are a leading indicator for NPS drops 2 weeks later — that's much more valuable than the proxy alone.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.