analyze
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cross-check spec, plan, and tasks for consistency. Phase 4.5 of the eight-phase workflow. Catches scope drift, missing acceptance criteria, dependency cycles. Modeled on github/spec-kit /speckit.analyze. Run after /tasks, before /implement.
70 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jhlee0409/proc-janitortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Beskars-Code/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Gabriel-Lafrance/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use revise, write and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
stormlightlabsSkillrevise
Address review comments on an open pull request and push the fixes. Use for /edit, /revise, or when asked to respond to review feedback on a PR number.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DockerSkillwrite
Write or edit reader-facing technical prose for immediate comprehension. Use for documentation, PR titles and descriptions, release notes, design documents, user-facing explanations, and substantive comments. Also use when asked to make writing clearer, more natural, less AI-generated, or easier to read. For documentation fixes, handles edits, formatting, self-review, and commits after research identifies what to change. Do not use for code-only tasks with no prose deliverable.
Also in 6 projects that use this
H-mmerSkillsubmit
Draft and submit a vulnerability report to the bug bounty platform. Reads scope.yaml for platform/program, uses brain + findings for content. Always drafts first for review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillquality
Evaluates whether a GitHub issue is spam, empty, needs more information, or is OK to proceed.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillchecklist
Generate quality validation checklist from spec, plan, and tasks. Use after creating tasks. Triggers on: create checklist, quality checklist, validation checklist.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JosBen74Skillosint
OSINT-sökning och informationsinhämtning från öppna källor för Länsstyrelsen VG
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions70 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 70
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex★ 34ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- H-mmer/pentest-agents★ 815same name
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tool★ 432same name
- hardisgroupcom/sfdx-hardis★ 432same name
- nwiizo/tfmcp★ 373same name
- hsantanna88/clo-author★ 262same name
- hugosantanna/clo-author★ 262same name
- ansvisor/ansvisor★ 233same name
60 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository60 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- animation-disciplineSkill
- api-versioningSkill
- autopilotSkill
- browser-e2eSkill
- characterizeSkill
- clarifySkill
- codemodSkill
- constitution-compactSkill
- constitutionSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- creative-webSkill
- db-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- detect-stackSkill
- dispatch-criteriaSkill
- dreamSkill
- experimentSkill
- fastapiSkill
- flag-cleanupSkill
- flag-rolloutSkill
- flask-realtimeSkill
- framework-detectorSkill
- front-end-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- image-generationSkill
- implementSkill
- initiativeSkill
- instinctSkill
- loopSkill
- nextjsSkill
- observabilitySkill
- okr-alignSkill
- parallel-swarmSkill
- pivotSkill
- planSkill
- pr-bodySkill
- prime-disciplineSkill
- prod-observabilitySkill
- react-nodeSkill
- react-viteSkill
- release-trainSkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- security-guardSkill
- self-healSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- specifySkill
- tailwind-disciplineSkill
- tasksSkill
- tdd-loopSkill
- token-budgetSkill
- typographySkill
- verify-loopSkill
- verifySkill
- wip-checkpointSkill
- <kebab-case-skill-name>Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 60 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Read the spec (specs/active/<id>-<slug>.md).
- Very specific: line 17
Read the plan (plans/active/<id>-<slug>.md).
- Very specific: line 18
Read the tasks in tasks/TASKS.md filtered by spec:<id>.
- Distinctive: line 19
Run the consistency checklist (below).
- Very specific: line 23
Write .claude/state/analyze-<id>.json with exactly:
- Distinctive: line 67
After save: post the summary to the user.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 60 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Analyze
Cross-artifact consistency check. Catch drift before it becomes code.
Process
- Read the spec (
specs/active/<id>-<slug>.md). - Read the plan (
plans/active/<id>-<slug>.md). - Read the tasks in
tasks/TASKS.mdfiltered byspec:<id>. - Run the consistency checklist (below).
- Report findings, severity-tagged.
- Write the machine marker (e2e-audit spec-pipeline-1 — this is what makes the
gate real; without it next-task.sh/workflow-state.sh see the spec as unanalyzed):
Write
.claude/state/analyze-<id>.jsonwith exactly:{"verdict": "PASS|BLOCK", "blockers": ["<each BLOCKER finding>"], "date": "<ISO>"}<id>is the numeric spec id (e.g.analyze-042.json). Re-running /analyze overwrites the marker — verdict reflects the LATEST run. - Block
/implementif any blockers — the marker'sverdict: BLOCKis enforced bynext-task.sh --require-analyze(loop path), not just by this prose.
Consistency checks
- Every spec acceptance criterion has at least one task that exercises it.
- Every plan component is implemented by at least one task.
- No task references a file outside the plan's scope.
- No cyclic dependencies in the task DAG.
- Every task's
accept:command is syntactically valid (no obvious typos). - All declared dependencies (packages, services, MCP servers) appear in install/setup tasks.
- Spec, plan, and tasks share the same id namespace.
- No open
[OQ]items in the spec. - Phase boundaries align — every plan phase has tasks; no orphan tasks.
- Risks in the plan have mitigation tasks or explicit acceptance of the risk.
- Backwards-compat constraints from the spec appear as tests.
Output
# Analysis — feature <id> — <date>
## Coverage
- Spec criteria with tasks: 8/8 ✓
- Plan components with tasks: 6/6 ✓
- Tasks with accept commands: 12/12 ✓
## Gaps
- BLOCKER: Acceptance criterion "rate limit 100 req/min" has no task.
- HIGH: Plan mentions `redis-rate-limiter` but no install task.
## Cycles
- None ✓
## Verdict
BLOCK — 1 blocker, 1 high. Address before /implement.After save: post the summary to the user. If green, "Ready for /implement." If red, list the gaps.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

