agentleFS
proffesor-for-testingproffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/.claude/skills/validation-pipeline/SKILL.md

validation-pipeline

Skill524 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run structured validation pipelines that execute steps sequentially, enforce gates at blocking failures, and produce scored reports.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    When validating requirements documents

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    When running structured quality gates

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    When assessing document completeness, testability, or traceability

    line 21
  5. Very specific:

    When invoked via /validation-pipeline

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Read the file specified by the user.

    line 44
  7. Distinctive:

    After pipeline execution, record the outcome for learning:

    line 115

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Validation Pipeline

Purpose

Run structured validation pipelines that execute steps sequentially, enforce gates at blocking failures, and produce scored reports. Uses .claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs with 13 requirements validation steps (BMAD-003).

Activation

  • When validating requirements documents
  • When running structured quality gates
  • When assessing document completeness, testability, or traceability
  • When invoked via /validation-pipeline

Quick Start

# Validate a requirements document (all 13 steps)
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md

# Validate with specific steps only
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --steps format-check,completeness-check,invest-criteria

# Continue past blocking failures
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --continue-on-failure

# Output as JSON
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --json

Workflow

Step 1: Read the Target Document

Read the file specified by the user. If no file is provided, ask for one.

Read the target document using the Read tool.
Store the content for pipeline execution.

Step 2: Select Pipeline

Choose the appropriate pipeline based on the user's request:

PipelineStepsUse Case
requirements13Requirements documents, PRDs, user stories

Additional pipelines can be added to .claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs.

Step 3: Execute Pipeline

The pipeline helper (.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs) handles execution:

  1. Sequential execution — steps run in order, each receiving results from prior steps
  2. Gate enforcement — blocking steps that fail halt the pipeline (unless --continue-on-failure)
  3. Per-step scoring — each step produces a 0-100 score with findings and evidence
  4. Weighted rollup — overall score uses category weights (format=10%, content=30%, quality=25%, traceability=20%, compliance=15%)

Requirements Pipeline Steps (13 total)

#Step IDCategorySeverityWhat It Checks
1format-checkformatblockingHeadings, required sections, document length
2completeness-checkcontentblockingRequired fields populated, acceptance criteria present
3invest-criteriaqualitywarningIndependent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable
4smart-acceptancequalitywarningSpecific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound
5testability-scorequalitywarningCan each requirement be tested?
6vague-term-detectioncontentinfoFlags "should", "might", "various", "etc."
7information-densitycontentinfoEvery sentence carries weight, no filler
8traceability-checktraceabilitywarningRequirements-to-tests mapping exists
9implementation-leakagequalitywarningRequirements don't prescribe implementation
10domain-compliancecomplianceinfoAlignment with domain model
11dependency-analysistraceabilityinfoCross-requirement dependencies identified
12bdd-scenario-generationqualitywarningCan generate Given/When/Then for each requirement
13holistic-qualitycomplianceblockingOverall coherence, no contradictions

Step 4: Report Results

Format the pipeline result as a structured report:

# Validation Report: Requirements Pipeline

**Overall**: PASS/FAIL/WARN | **Score**: 85/100 | **Duration**: 42ms

## Step Results
| # | Step | Status | Score | Findings | Duration |
|---|------|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | Format Check | PASS | 100 | 0 | 2ms |
| 2 | Completeness | WARN | 60 | 2 | 5ms |
...

## Blockers
- (blocking findings listed here)

## All Findings
- [HIGH] Missing acceptance criteria: Requirement US-104 has no AC
- [MEDIUM] Vague term: "should" used 5 times without specifics
...

Step 5: Record Learning

After pipeline execution, record the outcome for learning:

// Store validation pattern
memory store --namespace validation-pipeline --key "req-validation-{timestamp}" --value "{score, findings_count, halted}"

Parameters

ParameterTypeDefaultDescription
pipelinestringrequirementsPipeline type to run
filestringrequiredPath to document to validate
--stepsstringallComma-separated step IDs to run (e.g., format-check,completeness-check)
--continue-on-failurebooleanfalseSkip blocking gates
--jsonbooleanfalseOutput as JSON instead of markdown
--metadataobject{}Additional context for steps

Integration Points

  • qe-requirements-validator agent — delegates structured validation to this pipeline
  • qe-quality-gate agent — uses pipeline for gate evaluation
  • YAML Pipelines — can invoke validation steps as workflow actions
  • MCP — accessible via pipeline_validate tool

Output Schema

The pipeline produces a PipelineResult object (see schemas/output.json):

{
  pipelineId: string;
  pipelineName: string;
  overall: 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn';
  score: number;           // 0-100 weighted average
  steps: StepResult[];     // per-step details
  blockers: Finding[];     // blocking findings
  halted: boolean;
  haltedAt?: string;       // step ID where halted
  totalDuration: number;
  timestamp: string;
}

Error Handling

  • Step throws exception — captured as a FAIL with critical finding, pipeline continues or halts per severity
  • File not found — report error, do not run pipeline
  • Empty document — format-check step will catch this as a blocking failure

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.