agentleFS
Sign inStart free
prestariusprestarius/jet-skills-stack/skills/threat-model/SKILL.md

threat-model

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Quick security pass over code or a design using OWASP Top 10 + STRIDE, findings by severity with a remediation each. Use when the user asks for a threat model, a security pass, or "what could go wrong security-wise" on a design or code path. Distinct from the bundled /security-review, which diffs the branch against origin.

57 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use vuln-scan, supply-chain-review and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    vuln-scan

    Static source-code vulnerability scan. Reads a target directory (and THREAT_MODEL.md if present), spawns parallel review subagents per focus area, and writes VULN-FINDINGS.json + .md for /triage to consume. Read-only — no building, running, or network. For execution-verified crashes, use vuln-pipeline instead. Use when asked to "scan for vulns", "review this code for security issues", "find bugs in <dir>", or as the step between /threat-model and /triage.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • MesteriisSkill

    supply-chain-review

    Reviews lockfiles, installers, provenance, CI permissions, dependency confusion, artifacts, registries, and publishing.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    patch

    Generate candidate fixes for verified security findings. Consumes

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • mbwsimsSkill

    orbit

    Run for repo-wide or diff-wide readiness sweeps: "/orbit", "/orbit pr", "/orbit deep", "/orbit quick", "audit this project", "project-wide review", "is this PR ready overall", or "combined security, tests, codebase, evolution, and instruction review". Use this for broad multi-system assessment, not for a single-file review or a one-domain question.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mbwsimsSkill

    test-plan

    This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan tests", "what should I test", "what tests do I need", "test plan for", "testing strategy for", "test matrix for", "what cases should I cover", "help me plan tests", mentions "/test-plan", or wants to understand what tests are needed before writing any test code.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Sagargupta16Skill

    dependency-audit

    Audit project dependencies for security vulnerabilities, licensing issues, maintenance health, and optimization opportunities. Use it during regular security audits (monthly or quarterly); before a major release when you want to ensure the dependency tree is clean; when evaluating whether to adopt or replace a dependency; after a security advisory affects one of your dependencies; when your install times or bundle sizes have grown noticeably.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read ./CONTEXT.md if present.

    line 8

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Read ./CONTEXT.md if present. Review $ARGUMENTS:

  • OWASP Top 10 walk-through relevant to the surface (authz, injection, secrets, SSRF, etc.).
  • STRIDE per trust boundary (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info disclosure, DoS, Elevation). Output findings by severity with a concrete remediation each. Never weaponize — defensive only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free