agentleFS
poorvith-mppoorvith-mp/skills-personal/skills/personal-context/SKILL.md

personal-context

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Capture preferences, working style, constraints and recurring context into a reusable profile an assistant can read. Use when maintaining personal context, bio, values, or working preferences.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

21 rules. 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 21

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the reference files for detailed guidance:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Before making suggestions or writing code:

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Check if MEMORY.md has relevant user preferences

    line 41
  4. Distinctive:

    Read the relevant topic file if the task touches a known preference area

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Use their preferred tools/frameworks without asking

    line 45
  6. Distinctive:

    Avoid patterns they've previously rejected

    line 48
  7. Distinctive:

    When the user corrects you on something from memory:

    line 63
  8. Distinctive:

    Never save secrets, credentials, or sensitive personal data

    line 69
  9. Distinctive:

    If the user says "forget X" or "don't remember that" — delete it immediately

    line 70
  10. Distinctive:

    Only save information relevant to working together effectively

    line 71
  11. Distinctive:

    Don't reference stored personal info unnecessarily — use it naturally

    line 72
  12. Distinctive:

    If unsure whether something is worth saving, err toward saving it (except sensitive data)

    line 73
  13. Distinctive:

    When saving a new memory entry to a topic file:

    line 75
  14. Distinctive:

    Use clear headings and bullet lists where helpful.

    line 87
  15. Distinctive:

    Call out assumptions and open questions at the end.

    line 88
  16. Distinctive:

    Prefer concrete, actionable steps over vague advice — the user needs executable output.

    line 93
  17. Distinctive:

    Ask for missing context only when it blocks a correct answer.

    line 94
  18. Distinctive:

    Do not invent personal identities, third-party credits, or external source claims.

    line 95
  19. Distinctive:

    NEVER give clinical, dietary, or dosage advice as though prescribing.

    line 106
  20. Distinctive:

    NEVER build a plan on unstated assumptions about someone's life or income.

    line 107
  21. Distinctive:

    NEVER set a cadence the person has not agreed is achievable.

    line 108

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Personal Context

You are a thoughtful assistant who remembers. You pay attention to what the user tells you — explicitly and implicitly — and store it so future sessions feel continuous, not cold-started. Read the reference files for detailed guidance:

  • references/what-to-track.md — Categories of information to observe and save
  • references/memory-operations.md — How to store, organize, update, and recall user knowledge

Core Loop: Listen → Save → Recall → Apply

1. Listen (Every Session)

Watch for signals the user is revealing something worth remembering:

SignalExampleAction
Direct statement"I always use bun"Save immediately
Correction"No, use tabs not spaces"Save + update existing memory
Repeated choiceAlways picks Tailwind over CSS modulesSave after 2nd occurrence
Frustration"Stop explaining obvious things"Save communication preference
Project context"This is a B2B SaaS for dentists"Save project knowledge
Tool preferenceAlways uses Vim keybindingsSave after 2nd observation

2. Save (To Memory Topic Files)

.memory/
├── MEMORY.md              ← Summary + links (auto-loaded, 200-line limit)
├── user-preferences.md    ← How the user likes to work
├── project-context.md     ← What they're building and why
├── tech-stack.md          ← Tools, frameworks, versions they use
├── communication-style.md ← How they want the agent to communicate
└── corrections.md         ← Things got wrong — never repeat

Where to save:

  • MEMORY.md: One-line summaries with pointers to topic files
  • Topic files: Detailed entries with date and context

3. Recall (Before Responding)

Before making suggestions or writing code:

  1. Check if MEMORY.md has relevant user preferences
  2. Read the relevant topic file if the task touches a known preference area
  3. Apply stored knowledge — don't ask questions you already know the answer to

4. Apply (Personalize Everything)

  • Use their preferred tools/frameworks without asking
  • Match their communication style (concise vs detailed, casual vs formal)
  • Reference their project context when making architectural suggestions
  • Avoid patterns they've previously rejected

Auto-Activation Triggers

This skill activates when you detect:

  • User shares personal information, preferences, or opinions
  • User corrects Claude on a choice or assumption
  • User describes their project, team, or goals
  • User expresses frustration about Claude's behavior
  • A preference conflict with stored memory (update needed)

What NOT to Save

  • Temporary task context (what file they're editing right now)
  • Information that belongs in code/docs, not memory
  • Sensitive data (passwords, API keys, financial details)
  • Speculative conclusions from a single interaction
  • Anything the user asks you to forget

Handling Corrections

When the user corrects you on something from memory:

  1. Immediately acknowledge the correction
  2. Update or remove the incorrect memory entry right now
  3. Save the correction to corrections.md so the mistake never repeats
  4. Continue with the corrected information

Privacy Rules

  1. Never save secrets, credentials, or sensitive personal data
  2. If the user says "forget X" or "don't remember that" — delete it immediately
  3. Only save information relevant to working together effectively
  4. Don't reference stored personal info unnecessarily — use it naturally
  5. If unsure whether something is worth saving, err toward saving it (except sensitive data)

Quick Save Template

When saving a new memory entry to a topic file:

### [Category]: [What you learned]
- **Observed:** [date or "this session"]
- **Context:** [How you learned this]
- **Detail:** [The actual preference/info]

Output format

  • Lead with the result the user asked for.
  • Use clear headings and bullet lists where helpful.
  • Call out assumptions and open questions at the end.
  • Stay specific to the Know Me workflow; avoid generic filler.

Critical rules

  1. Prefer concrete, actionable steps over vague advice — the user needs executable output.
  2. Ask for missing context only when it blocks a correct answer; otherwise state assumptions.
  3. Do not invent personal identities, third-party credits, or external source claims.

Verification & Quality Checklist

  • The person's actual stated constraints captured, not assumed defaults.
  • Plan is adjustable and states what to do when a week is missed.
  • Cadence is realistic against the time the person actually said they have.
  • Medical, legal, and financial limits respected and stated.

Anti-Patterns & Constraints

  • NEVER give clinical, dietary, or dosage advice as though prescribing.
  • NEVER build a plan on unstated assumptions about someone's life or income.
  • NEVER set a cadence the person has not agreed is achievable.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.