sync-blocker-auditor
Skill142 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audits a SharePoint document library for names and paths that break OneDrive sync, File Explorer, and Teams file access. Flags illegal characters, leading/trailing spaces, trailing periods, Windows reserved names, "#"/"%" legacy characters, paths over the 400-character URL limit, excessive nesting, long-term checked-out files, and junk artifacts. Scores sync readiness, proposes a safe rename for every blocker, and saves a self-contained HTML report. It is strictly read-only — it never renames, moves, or deletes anything.
In this repository61 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-document-librarySkill
- broken-link-auditorSkill
- build-sharepoint-business-solutionSkill
- campaign-storySkill
- convert-cowork-skill-to-sharepointSkill
- copilot-toolboxSkill
- custom-image-taggerSkill
- decision-register-builderSkill
- document-browserSkill
- dossierSkill
- exec-reportSkill
- file-classifierSkill
- find-relevant-skillSkill
- flashcards-dashboardSkill
- generate-site-onboarding-guideSkill
- generate-test-contentSkill
- guest-access-reviewerSkill
- intranet-page-lifecycle-reviewSkill
- invoice-po-reconciliationSkill
- kb-ai-review-liteSkill
- knowledge-readiness-advisorSkill
- learning-designerSkill
- library-cleanupSkill
- list-stylingSkill
- metadata-completeness-auditorSkill
- narrated-story-animationSkill
- news-governance-reviewSkill
- organize-librarySkill
- permission-reportSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-intelligence-change-event-extractionSkill
- project-intelligence-root-cause-analysisSkill
- project-intelligence-timeline-dashboardSkill
- rename-files-date-prefixSkill
- resume-screening-summarizerSkill
- review-councilSkill
- rfp-response-compliance-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-content-finderSkill
- rfp-response-content-generationSkill
- rfp-response-extractionSkill
- rfp-response-proposal-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-quality-tone-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-strategy-synthesisSkill
- roadmap-timelineSkill
- scorecard-matrixSkill
- sharepoint-safe-htmlSkill
- site-pages-content-calendarSkill
- site-storage-heatmapSkill
- style-bentoSkill
- style-blueprintSkill
- style-figma-cleanSkill
- style-glassmorphismSkill
- style-high-contrastSkill
- style-monochromeSkill
- style-neobrutalismSkill
- style-pastelSkill
- style-retroSkill
- style-terminalSkill
- team-newsletter-publisherSkill
- topic-explainerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not use this skill to actually rename or fix items.
- Distinctive: line 60
If no scope can be resolved, ask the user which library to audit.
- Distinctive: line 62
Only audit content the current user can already see.
- Very specific: line 69
Use list_items with recursive=true to enumerate files and folders, projecting at minimum: FileLeafRef (name), FileRef (server-relative …
- Very specific: line 83
Do not evaluate the rules by eye.
- Very specific: line 139
If the proposal collides with an existing name in the same folder, append (2), (3),
- Distinctive: line 140
If a name cannot be made safe by renaming alone (for example, the path is long because of folder depth, not the file name), say so and …
- Distinctive: line 154
No scripts. No external CSS, fonts, images, or resources.
- Distinctive: line 175
Keep percentages as whole numbers and be consistent throughout the report.
- Very specific: line 182
Create the Sync Reports folder only if it does not exist, and only to hold the report.
- Very specific: line 183
Use a clear filename: Sync-Blocker-Audit-<Library>-YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM.html.
- Distinctive: line 184
If the save fails because the user lacks write access anywhere on the site, do not stop — say the report could not be saved, and return the …
- Distinctive: line 188
After saving, reply with a compact Markdown summary and the report link:
- Very specific: line 225
Strictly read-only: Never rename, move, delete, check in, check out, or modify any item, folder, column, view, or setting.
- Distinctive: line 228
Never fabricate items, paths, names, or check-out owners — everything comes from the actual library.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sync Blocker Auditor
Purpose
SharePoint accepts file and folder names that the OneDrive sync client, File Explorer, and the Teams Files tab later refuse to handle. The result is the classic "we can't sync this file" error that surfaces one user at a time, long after the content was uploaded, with no way to see how widespread the problem is.
This skill audits a document library against Microsoft's documented naming and path restrictions, scores its sync readiness, and produces a severity-ranked HTML report with a proposed safe name for every blocked item.
It is strictly read-only: it never renames, moves, deletes, checks in, or modifies any item. The only thing it writes is the HTML report file.
Trigger Phrases
Activate this skill when the user says any of the following (or close variations):
- "sync blockers" / "sync health check" / "sync readiness report"
- "why won't this library sync" / "OneDrive sync errors" / "sync is failing"
- "check file names" / "invalid file names" / "illegal characters" / "bad characters"
- "path too long" / "url too long" / "400 character limit"
- "files stuck checked out" / "who has files checked out"
Do not use this skill to actually rename or fix items. If the user asks for the fix to be applied, explain that this skill is read-only, hand them the rename plan from the report, and point them at a rename-capable skill or a bulk-rename tool.
Inputs & Scope
Determine the audit scope from the user's request and the current context, in this order:
- Selected items or folder — if the user has items selected or says "these/this folder", audit that subtree.
- Named library — if the user names one (e.g., "audit the Project Files library"), resolve it on the current site.
- Current library — if the user is in a library and gives no other scope, audit it recursively from its root.
- If no scope can be resolved, ask the user which library to audit. Do not guess.
Only audit content the current user can already see. Never invent items, paths, or values.
Steps
Step 1 — Resolve the library and enumerate every item
- Resolve the target library and capture its server-relative root URL (needed for accurate path-length maths).
- Use
list_itemswithrecursive=trueto enumerate files and folders, projecting at minimum:FileLeafRef(name),FileRef(server-relative path),FileDirRef(parent path),FSObjType(0 = file, 1 = folder),File_x0020_Size,Modified,Editor, and the check-out fields (CheckoutUser/IsCheckedoutToLocal) when available. - Page through the entire library — do not stop at the first page. A single recursive
list_itemscall can exceed the response-size limit above roughly 1,000 items, which is exactly the size of the migrated libraries this skill targets. If that happens, fall back to walking one folder at a time and aggregating the running totals withexecute_code. If a read fails or returns partial data, record that plainly in the report's Limitations section instead of guessing.
Tell the user the scope and item count before analysing.
Step 2 — Apply the rule set
Do not evaluate the rules by eye. Use execute_code to do the character counting, pattern
matching, and aggregation — exact URL lengths, character-class matches, and per-rule totals must
be computed, not estimated.
An item can match several rules; record all matches, and rank the item by its highest severity. The Scope column says which item types a rule applies to.
Blockers (severity: Blocker — sync fails, or the item is unreachable from Explorer)
| ID | Rule | Detection | Scope | |
B1 | Illegal characters | Name contains any of `" * : < > ? / \ | ` | files + folders |
B2 | Leading or trailing whitespace | Name starts or ends with a space or tab | files + folders | |
B3 | Trailing period | The full name ends with ., or the base name (the text before the final extension) ends with .. A period between words, as in Q3.Budget.docx, is not a finding. | files + folders | |
B4 | Reserved Windows device name | Base name (case-insensitive) is CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, COM0–COM9, or LPT0–LPT9 | files + folders | |
B5 | Reserved SharePoint/OneDrive name | Name is .lock or desktop.ini; _vti_ appears anywhere in the name; a file or folder at the library root is named forms; a folder name begins with ゛ or ဧ | files + folders | |
B6 | Leading tilde-dollar | Name starts with ~$ — an orphaned Office lock file, disallowed by OneDrive and SharePoint | files + folders | |
B7 | URL over the SharePoint limit | Full decoded URL (https://<tenant>/<site>/<library>/<path>/<name>) exceeds 400 characters | files + folders | |
B8 | Name segment too long | Any single file or folder name exceeds 255 characters — the per-name limit in File Explorer and Finder, not in SharePoint itself | files + folders |
Risks (severity: Risk — works in the browser, breaks desktop clients, tooling, or migrations)
| ID | Rule | Detection | Scope |
R1 | Characters hostile to legacy clients and tooling | Name contains #, %, &, {, }, or +. These have been fully supported by SharePoint Online since 2017 — modern sharing links encode them correctly. They remain a risk for hand-constructed REST/CSOM URLs, migration tools, third-party integrations, and on-premises clients. | files + folders |
R2 | Path over the Windows limit | Full path exceeds 260 characters — File Explorer and the Office desktop apps cannot open, rename, or move the item, and the local sync root adds a further 30–60 characters on top. This bites long before B7 does. | files + folders |
R3 | Deep nesting | Item is more than 8 folder levels below the library root | files + folders |
R4 | Long-term check-out | Checked out for more than 7 days — colleagues only ever receive the last checked-in version | files only |
R5 | Non-printable or bidirectional characters | Name contains control characters, zero-width characters, or RTL/LTR override marks | files + folders |
R6 | TMP files | Extension is .tmp or .temp — OneDrive does not sync TMP files at all | files only |
Info (severity: Info — noise that should not be in a synced library)
| ID | Rule | Detection | Scope |
I1 | Junk artifacts | Thumbs.db, .DS_Store, ehthumbs.db | files only |
I2 | Backup / leftover files | Extension is .bak, .old, .partial, .crdownload, or .laccdb | files only |
I3 | Zero-byte files | File size is 0 bytes | files only |
I1–I3 are advisory — never present them as sync failures. Never apply a files only rule
to a folder: folders report a size of 0 and would otherwise all be flagged by I3.
Do not flag names merely for being vague, generic, or unhelpful (Document.docx,
Untitled.xlsx, Misc), and do not flag leading-dot names such as .gitignore for having an
empty base name. Readability is a different problem, handled by other skills. This skill only
reports technical sync and URL blockers.
Step 3 — Propose a safe name for every Blocker
For each item with a Blocker, derive a suggested name — as a proposal only, never applied:
- Replace every illegal character (
B1) with a single-. - Replace
#,%,&,{,},+with-only when the item already has a Blocker; otherwise leave them and report asR1. - Collapse runs of
-or spaces into one, then trim leading/trailing spaces, tabs, and periods. - For
B4reserved device names, prefix the name withfile-(CON.docx→file-CON.docx). ForB5/B6, first strip the reserved~$or_vti_prefix, then addfile-(~$Proposal.docx→file-Proposal.docx) — never leave the reserved prefix in place. - For
B7/B8, shorten the base name — keep the first meaningful words, drop filler, and always preserve the original extension. State the new full-URL length. - If the proposal collides with an existing name in the same folder, append
(2),(3), … - If a name cannot be made safe by renaming alone (for example, the path is long because of folder depth, not the file name), say so and recommend the folder-level fix instead.
Show both the original and the proposal so a human can approve each one.
Step 4 — Compute the scores
- Sync readiness % = items with no Blocker ÷ total items scanned, as a whole number.
- Counts of Blocker / Risk / Info items (an item counts once, at its highest severity).
- Rule frequency — how many items matched each rule ID, sorted descending.
- Folder hot spots — the folders containing the most affected items.
- Longest URL — the single worst path, with its character count.
Step 5 — Build a self-contained HTML report
Draft one self-contained HTML file:
- No scripts. No external CSS, fonts, images, or resources. Inline CSS only.
- Summary band — items scanned, sync readiness %, Blocker / Risk / Info counts, longest URL length, and the single most common rule.
- Severity strip — three coloured cards: Blocker (red
#b3261e), Risk (amber#a16207), Info (blue#1e40af). - Rule frequency chart — one row per matched rule showing rule ID, plain-English label, and
a horizontal bar drawn with inline-CSS width (e.g., a coloured
<div>atwidth: 62%), coloured by the rule's severity. - Findings table — one row per affected item: name, folder path, severity badge, matched rule IDs, a plain-English reason, and the proposed safe name. Sort Blockers first.
- Path-length table — the 10 longest URLs with their character counts, each drawn as a bar against the 400-character SharePoint limit, with the 260-character Windows limit marked so it is obvious which items already break the desktop clients.
- Checked-out table — file, who has it checked out, and for how many days (omit the section entirely if there are none).
- Folder hot spots — the folders with the most affected items.
- Remediation list — a short, prioritised, plain-English list, most impactful first
("Rename 12 files containing
:— sync fails for every user", "FlattenProjects/2026/Q3/...— 6 files are within 40 characters of the URL limit"). - Limitations section — only if any data was unavailable or the scan was partial.
Keep percentages as whole numbers and be consistent throughout the report.
Step 6 — Save the report
- Save the HTML file in a
Sync Reportsfolder in the site's default Documents library (or Site Assets). Never write into the library under audit unless the user explicitly asks — writing a report into the audited scope changes the very thing that was just measured, and the reports accumulate as findings on the next run. - Create the
Sync Reportsfolder only if it does not exist, and only to hold the report. - Use a clear filename:
Sync-Blocker-Audit-<Library>-YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM.html. - If the save fails because the user lacks write access anywhere on the site, do not stop — say the report could not be saved, and return the full findings inline as Markdown instead.
Step 7 — Respond to the user
After saving, reply with a compact Markdown summary and the report link:
# Sync blocker audit complete
[Open the report](<link>)
- Scope: <library / folder audited>
- Items scanned: <n> (<n> files, <n> folders)
- Sync readiness: <n>% (Blockers <n> · Risks <n> · Info <n>)
- Top blocker: <rule label> on <n> items
- Longest URL: <n> characters (limit 400)Example
User: "Why won't the Project Files library sync?"
Agent response after processing:
I audited Project Files (412 items — 366 files, 46 folders) against the OneDrive sync and URL rules.
Metric Result Sync readiness 91% Blockers / Risks / Info 36 / 58 / 9 Top blocker Illegal characters ( B1) on 21 itemsLongest URL 438 characters (limit 400) The worst offender is
Clients/Northwind/Contracts/Q3: Signed & Approved/— the:in that folder name blocks every one of the 14 files inside it for every synced user.I saved the report to
Sync Reports/Sync-Blocker-Audit-Project-Files-2026-08-20-1130.html, including a proposed safe name for all 36 blocked items. Nothing was renamed.
Constraints
- Strictly read-only. Never rename, move, delete, check in, check out, or modify any item,
folder, column, view, or setting. The only thing this skill writes is the HTML report file
(and, if needed, the
Sync Reportsfolder to hold it). - Never fabricate items, paths, names, or check-out owners — everything comes from the actual library.
- Rename suggestions are proposals only. Always present them for human approval and state explicitly that nothing was changed.
- Measure URL length against the full decoded URL, not the file name alone, and always state
the limit next to the number — 400 characters for SharePoint (
B7), 260 for Windows (R2). - Compute lengths, character matches, and totals with
execute_code. Never estimate a character count by inspection. - Report technical blockers only. Do not flag names for being vague, generic, or unhelpful.
- Page through the entire library; report partial results plainly if a tool fails.
- The HTML report must be fully self-contained: no scripts, no external resources, inline CSS only.
- Match on names case-insensitively, but always display the original name exactly as stored,
including the whitespace that caused the finding (wrap such names in
`so trailing spaces stay visible).
References
- Restrictions and limitations in OneDrive and SharePoint — the disallowed names (
.lock,desktop.ini,~$…,_vti_, rootforms) and the TMP-files behaviour behindB5,B6, andR6. - What are the file path length limits? — the 400-character decoded-path limit (
B7), the 255-character per-name limit (B8), and the 260-character Windows limit (R2). - SharePoint Online limits
The illegal-character, whitespace, and trailing-period rules (
B1–B3) are enforced by SharePoint and Windows at upload and rename time rather than being listed in the article above. They matter because content that arrived through migrations, the API, or third-party tools bypassed that enforcement — which is why these names exist in real libraries at all.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

