exec-report
Skill142 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates a polished, self-contained HTML executive report or dashboard from any data source — SharePoint lists, CSV exports, or a user description. Use when asked to build an exec report, one-pager, summary page, status dashboard, project summary, business review, or any single-page visual summary of data. Interviews the user if data is incomplete, constructs a validated JSON document block by block, then renders it into a single sandbox-safe HTML file using the component library. No external dependencies — output runs inside a SharePoint sandboxed iframe.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- saivarun3407/DFIR-AItheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- saivarun3407/DFIR-AI★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository61 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-document-librarySkill
- broken-link-auditorSkill
- build-sharepoint-business-solutionSkill
- campaign-storySkill
- convert-cowork-skill-to-sharepointSkill
- copilot-toolboxSkill
- custom-image-taggerSkill
- decision-register-builderSkill
- document-browserSkill
- dossierSkill
- file-classifierSkill
- find-relevant-skillSkill
- flashcards-dashboardSkill
- generate-site-onboarding-guideSkill
- generate-test-contentSkill
- guest-access-reviewerSkill
- intranet-page-lifecycle-reviewSkill
- invoice-po-reconciliationSkill
- kb-ai-review-liteSkill
- knowledge-readiness-advisorSkill
- learning-designerSkill
- library-cleanupSkill
- list-stylingSkill
- metadata-completeness-auditorSkill
- narrated-story-animationSkill
- news-governance-reviewSkill
- organize-librarySkill
- permission-reportSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-intelligence-change-event-extractionSkill
- project-intelligence-root-cause-analysisSkill
- project-intelligence-timeline-dashboardSkill
- rename-files-date-prefixSkill
- resume-screening-summarizerSkill
- review-councilSkill
- rfp-response-compliance-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-content-finderSkill
- rfp-response-content-generationSkill
- rfp-response-extractionSkill
- rfp-response-proposal-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-quality-tone-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-strategy-synthesisSkill
- roadmap-timelineSkill
- scorecard-matrixSkill
- sharepoint-safe-htmlSkill
- site-pages-content-calendarSkill
- site-storage-heatmapSkill
- style-bentoSkill
- style-blueprintSkill
- style-figma-cleanSkill
- style-glassmorphismSkill
- style-high-contrastSkill
- style-monochromeSkill
- style-neobrutalismSkill
- style-pastelSkill
- style-retroSkill
- style-terminalSkill
- sync-blocker-auditorSkill
- team-newsletter-publisherSkill
- topic-explainerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Check what the user has already provided before asking anything:
- Very specific: line 25
SharePoint lists: Call list_items on the relevant lists.
- Distinctive: line 33
If the data or intent is not fully clear, ask these questions in a single message — not one at a time:
- Distinctive: line 45
If the user's prompt already signals narrative intent (e.g., "the headline is the gap," "lead with urgency," "show the wins"), skip …
- Distinctive: line 59
Keep total block count to 4–8.
- Very specific: line 84
Never put a headline number in prose when kpi-row can show it larger.
- Very specific: line 85
Never use table for 2–4 numbers — use kpi-row.
- Distinctive: line 106
Run every check before rendering.
- Distinctive: line 146
If the site context specifies a folder for report output, save the file there after delivering it.
- Distinctive: line 152
No external URLs, CDN links, or web fonts in the output HTML.
- Distinctive: line 154
All data values must be pre-rendered into the HTML — the page must be fully correct with JavaScript disabled.
- Distinctive: line 155
Do not generate Python, PowerShell, or any other scripts — output is always the HTML file.
- Distinctive: line 156
Do not render until the validation checklist passes.
- Distinctive: line 157
Follow the no-Person-column-type rule for any accompanying SharePoint schema: use text columns only.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Exec Report
Generates a complete, self-contained HTML report by (1) interviewing the user or parsing their data, (2) constructing and validating a JSON document, then (3) rendering that JSON into HTML using assets/report-template.html. The JSON is the authoritative source of truth; the HTML is fully determined by it.
Step 1: Determine the Data Source
Check what the user has already provided before asking anything:
- SharePoint lists: Call
list_itemson the relevant lists. Read all needed columns before proceeding. - CSV or table pasted in chat: Parse all rows. Do not ask for data you already have.
- Verbal description only: Proceed to Step 2.
Step 2: Interview the User
If the data or intent is not fully clear, ask these questions in a single message — not one at a time:
- Topic: What is this report about? (e.g., "Q2 pipeline health," "IT project status," "department spend overview")
- Audience: Who is reading it? Exec team, department head, all-hands? This determines detail level.
- Narrative intent: What is the shape of the story? Pick the closest match:
- Achievement — "we hit a goal, here's how" (lead with the win: kpi-row + trend dominate)
- Problem — "something needs attention, here's what" (lead with urgency: status-grid or table comes first)
- Status — "here's where everything stands" (balanced overview: status-grid early, kpi-row supporting)
- Headline message: What should the reader walk away knowing? This becomes the hero sentence — one sentence.
- Sections wanted: Any specific sections — comparison to prior period, breakdown by category, status of open items, narrative highlights?
- Palette: Warm paper (cream/terra-cotta), deep ink (dark/gold), clean white (white/green), or slate (gray/blue)? Default to warm paper if no preference.
If the user's prompt already signals narrative intent (e.g., "the headline is the gap," "lead with urgency," "show the wins"), skip question 3 — you already have the answer.
Confirm your understanding before building the JSON.
Step 3: Choose Components and Narrative Order
The component sequence IS the story. Read references/components.md for the full component catalog, props schemas, and HTML patterns.
Always true:
- Open with
hero— sets the company, label, and hero sentence. - Close with
highlights— narrative "so what" belongs last. - Maximum one
trend, onetable, and onehighlightsper report. - Keep total block count to 4–8.
Narrative intent drives the block order:
| Intent | Typical sequence | Hero sentence shape |
| Achievement | hero → kpi-row → trend → bar-list → compare → status-grid → highlights | "We closed $X, up Y% from last quarter." |
| Problem | hero → status-grid → compare → table → bar-list → highlights | "We enter Q3 with X open roles and a gap in Y." |
| Status | hero → status-grid → kpi-row → compare → bar-list → highlights | "Here's where all six workstreams stand heading into Q3." |
The hero sentence signals intent to the reader. Achievement heroes lead with a number and a direction. Problem heroes lead with a situation. Status heroes lead with a scope statement.
Component selection guide:
| Data shape | Component |
| 2–4 headline numbers worth celebrating or tracking | kpi-row |
| Values over time (3+ periods) | trend |
| Category breakdown with relative sizes | bar-list |
| Structured numeric comparison (QoQ, YoY, plan vs. actual) | compare |
| Detailed row data (5+ items with 3+ fields) | table |
| Health or urgency status of multiple items | status-grid |
| Narrative insights: bright spots, risks, actions | highlights |
Hard rules:
- Never put a headline number in prose when
kpi-rowcan show it larger. - Never use
tablefor 2–4 numbers — usekpi-row. kpi-rowis not mandatory — omit it when the story is problem- or urgency-forward and metrics are supporting context, not the lead.
Step 4: Build and Validate the JSON Document
Construct the JSON object. Top-level structure:
report object (document metadata):
| Field | Required | Description |
palette | yes | warm-paper, deep-ink, clean-white, or slate |
footer_l | no | Left footer text, e.g. "Generated May 28, 2026" |
footer_r | no | Right footer text, e.g. "47 deals analyzed" |
blocks array — ordered list of content blocks. Each block: type string + props object. See references/components.md for every component's full props schema.
Validation Checklist
Run every check before rendering. Fix any failure before proceeding.
Document level:
report.paletteis one of:warm-paper,deep-ink,clean-white,slateblocksarray has at least one entry- First block
typeishero - Last block
typeishighlights - Block order reflects the declared narrative intent (achievement / problem / status)
Per block:
typeis one of:hero,kpi-row,trend,bar-list,compare,table,status-grid,highlights- All required props are present (see components.md)
- Numeric values are numbers, not strings with embedded units
- No block exceeds its item count limits (see components.md limits table)
Data integrity:
kpi-rowitems count is 2–4bar-listshares: largest item = 1.0, all others ≤ 1.0trenddata and labels arrays have the same length (3–12)trendprior_data (if present) same length as datacomparerows havedirset to"up"or"down"on every rowtableheaders count matches every row's cell counthighlightsitems count is 3–5
Step 5: Render the HTML
- Read
assets/report-template.html. - Replace
{{REPORT_TITLE}}in<title>with a concise page title (company + report label). - Replace
{{PALETTE_CLASS}}on<body>withpalette-+ the palette name (e.g.palette-warm-paper). - Generate the
heroblock HTML (.rpt-header+.hero) and replace{{HERO}}. - Generate all remaining blocks in order and replace
{{BLOCKS}}. - Replace
{{FOOTER_L}}and{{FOOTER_R}}with footer text (or empty strings). - Generate the
{{INLINE_SCRIPT}}content. Include:- Segment bar fill-in code (if any
bar-listblocks are present) - Trend tooltip JS with embedded
TREND_DATAarray (if atrendblock is present) - See the template's script comment block for the exact code patterns to use.
- Segment bar fill-in code (if any
- Deliver the complete file as the response. No prose outside the file.
If the site context specifies a folder for report output, save the file there after delivering it.
Hard Constraints
- No external URLs, CDN links, or web fonts in the output HTML.
- No
<script src>tags. All JavaScript must be inline. - All data values must be pre-rendered into the HTML — the page must be fully correct with JavaScript disabled. JS adds animations and tooltips but must never be required for correctness.
- Do not generate Python, PowerShell, or any other scripts — output is always the HTML file.
- Do not render until the validation checklist passes.
- Follow the no-Person-column-type rule for any accompanying SharePoint schema: use text columns only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

