dossier
Skill142 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Renders a polished, self-contained HTML briefing from any data source — SharePoint lists, uploaded documents, or a verbal description. Use when asked to build a competitor landscape, account brief, candidate summary, site inventory, board bio, speaker profile, partner overview, or any grid of profile cards or single-subject one-pager. Interviews the user if data is incomplete, constructs a validated JSON document, then renders it into a sandbox-safe HTML file using grid mode (2–8 subjects as responsive cards) or one-pager mode (1 subject as a rich briefing). No external dependencies — output runs inside a SharePoint sandboxed iframe.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yuanhaorannnnnn/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- koffih/claude-skill-dossiertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- eins78/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- JohnnyMcGee/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- samuel-neveugall/client-dossiertheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- eins78/agent-skills★ 2same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- samuel-neveugall/client-dossier★ 1same name
- dacrypt/tesla-claude-plugin★ 0same name
- JohnnyMcGee/claude-skills★ 0same name
- koffih/claude-skill-dossier★ 0same name
- stefanhoth/dossier★ 0same name
- yuanhaorannnnnn/agent-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository61 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-document-librarySkill
- broken-link-auditorSkill
- build-sharepoint-business-solutionSkill
- campaign-storySkill
- convert-cowork-skill-to-sharepointSkill
- copilot-toolboxSkill
- custom-image-taggerSkill
- decision-register-builderSkill
- document-browserSkill
- exec-reportSkill
- file-classifierSkill
- find-relevant-skillSkill
- flashcards-dashboardSkill
- generate-site-onboarding-guideSkill
- generate-test-contentSkill
- guest-access-reviewerSkill
- intranet-page-lifecycle-reviewSkill
- invoice-po-reconciliationSkill
- kb-ai-review-liteSkill
- knowledge-readiness-advisorSkill
- learning-designerSkill
- library-cleanupSkill
- list-stylingSkill
- metadata-completeness-auditorSkill
- narrated-story-animationSkill
- news-governance-reviewSkill
- organize-librarySkill
- permission-reportSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-intelligence-change-event-extractionSkill
- project-intelligence-root-cause-analysisSkill
- project-intelligence-timeline-dashboardSkill
- rename-files-date-prefixSkill
- resume-screening-summarizerSkill
- review-councilSkill
- rfp-response-compliance-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-content-finderSkill
- rfp-response-content-generationSkill
- rfp-response-extractionSkill
- rfp-response-proposal-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-quality-tone-reviewSkill
- rfp-response-strategy-synthesisSkill
- roadmap-timelineSkill
- scorecard-matrixSkill
- sharepoint-safe-htmlSkill
- site-pages-content-calendarSkill
- site-storage-heatmapSkill
- style-bentoSkill
- style-blueprintSkill
- style-figma-cleanSkill
- style-glassmorphismSkill
- style-high-contrastSkill
- style-monochromeSkill
- style-neobrutalismSkill
- style-pastelSkill
- style-retroSkill
- style-terminalSkill
- sync-blocker-auditorSkill
- team-newsletter-publisherSkill
- topic-explainerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Check what the user has already provided before asking anything:
- Very specific: line 25
SharePoint lists: Call list_items on the relevant lists.
- Distinctive: line 33
If the data or intent is not fully clear, ask these questions in a single message — not one at a time:
- Distinctive: line 39
Narrative emphasis: Should the summary emphasize product/capabilities, financials, relationships, risks, or something else?
- Distinctive: line 55
Do not ask about mode unless the count is exactly 1 and the user has not indicated a preference.
- Distinctive: line 104
Run every check before rendering.
- Distinctive: line 142
No external URLs, CDN links, or web fonts in the output HTML.
- Distinctive: line 144
All values must be pre-rendered — the page must be fully correct with JavaScript disabled.
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not generate Python, PowerShell, or any other scripts — output is always the HTML file.
- Distinctive: line 146
Do not render until the validation checklist passes.
- Distinctive: line 147
Do not use SharePoint Person column types in any accompanying list schema — use text columns only.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dossier
Generates a complete, self-contained HTML briefing by (1) interviewing the user or parsing their data, (2) constructing and validating a JSON document, then (3) rendering that JSON into HTML using assets/dossier-template.html. The JSON is the authoritative source of truth; the HTML is fully determined by it.
Step 1: Determine the Data Source
Check what the user has already provided before asking anything:
- SharePoint lists: Call
list_itemson the relevant lists. Read all needed columns before proceeding. - Uploaded documents or tables pasted in chat: Parse all content. Do not ask for data you already have.
- Verbal description only: Proceed to Step 2.
Step 2: Interview the User
If the data or intent is not fully clear, ask these questions in a single message — not one at a time:
- Subject type: What are you profiling? (competitors, accounts/prospects, candidates, SharePoint sites, board members, speakers, partners, vendors — or something else)
- Subject count: How many subjects? This determines the rendering mode.
- Purpose and audience: What decision does this briefing support? Who reads it? This determines detail level and which key facts matter most.
- Key facts: What are the 3–6 structured facts most important for each subject? Examples for competitors: HQ, founded, ARR, headcount. For candidates: current role, tenure, location, skills. For sites: owner, content type, last activity.
- Narrative emphasis: Should the summary emphasize product/capabilities, financials, relationships, risks, or something else?
- Palette: Warm paper (cream/terra-cotta), deep ink (dark/gold), clean white (white/green), or slate (gray/blue)? Default to warm paper.
- Mode override (only ask if count is 1 or user seems to want detail): Do you want a full one-pager briefing or a compact card?
Confirm your understanding before building the JSON.
Step 3: Choose the Rendering Mode
Auto-detection rule:
- 2–8 subjects → grid mode
- 1 subject → one-pager mode
- User explicitly says "one-pager" or "full briefing" → one-pager mode regardless of count
- User explicitly says "grid" or "landscape" → grid mode
Do not ask about mode unless the count is exactly 1 and the user has not indicated a preference.
Step 4: Decide What Goes Where
Key facts hold structured, scannable, low-word-count data — the kind of facts a reader needs in 5 seconds. Rules:
- 3–6 pairs. No sentences. Values should be short (under 6 words).
- Good:
"HQ | Austin, TX","ARR | ~$40M est.","Founded | 2019" - Bad:
"Company description | This is a company that..."(belongs in summary)
Tags are the fastest signal — 2–5 short labels that classify the subject. Use for: industry vertical, stage, geography, product category, or any grouping the reader uses for orientation.
Summary is 2–5 sentences of prose. Write in third person. Lead with the most important fact. No bullet points. This is the editorial paragraph — what an analyst would write.
Activity holds the 2–5 most recent, most relevant developments — in most-recent-first order. Each item gets a short date prefix (e.g., "Apr 2026") and a one-sentence description. For competitors: product launches, fundraises, acquisitions, executive changes. For candidates: recent projects, promotions, publications. For sites: content updates, ownership changes, traffic milestones.
Step 5: Build and Validate the JSON Document
Construct the JSON object. Top-level structure:
report object (document metadata):
| Field | Required | Description |
title | yes | Page title, e.g. "Competitor Landscape — Q2 2026" |
subtitle | no | Optional subtitle shown below title |
palette | yes | warm-paper, deep-ink, clean-white, or slate |
mode | no | "grid", "one-pager", or "auto" (default: "auto") |
footer | no | Footer text, e.g. "Prepared May 28, 2026 · Confidential" |
subjects array — ordered list of subject objects (1–8 items):
| Field | Required | Description |
id | yes | Unique slug, e.g. "acme-corp" |
name | yes | Subject display name |
type | yes | Category label shown as a pill, e.g. "Competitor", "Prospect", "Enterprise Site" |
status | no | Status label text, e.g. "Active", "Watch", "Inactive" |
status_color | no | green, amber, red, gray, or blue |
key_facts | yes | Array of {label, value} pairs, 2–6 items |
tags | yes | Array of strings, 1–6 tags |
summary | yes | 2–5 sentence prose paragraph |
activity | no | Array of {date, text} items, 0–5, most-recent first |
Validation Checklist
Run every check before rendering. Fix any failure before proceeding.
Document level:
report.paletteis one of:warm-paper,deep-ink,clean-white,slatesubjectsarray has 1–8 entriesreport.modeis"grid","one-pager", or"auto"(or omitted)
Per subject:
idis present and uniquenameandtypeare present and non-emptykey_factshas 2–6 items; each item haslabelandvaluetagshas 1–6 itemssummaryis present and 2–5 sentencesstatus_color(if present) is one of:green,amber,red,gray,blueactivityitems (if present) each havedateandtext; at most 5 items
Data integrity:
- No
key_factsvalue is a sentence — values must be short labels - Activity items are ordered most-recent first
- Subject count matches the chosen mode (grid: 2–8, one-pager: 1; or mode is explicitly set)
Step 6: Render the HTML
- Read
assets/dossier-template.html. - Replace
{{REPORT_TITLE}}in<title>with a concise page title. - Replace
{{PALETTE_CLASS}}on<body>withpalette-+ the palette name. - Determine final mode: if
report.modeis"auto"or omitted, use"grid"for 2–8 subjects and"one-pager"for 1 subject. - Replace
{{PAGE_HEADER}}with the.rpt-headerstrip (title + optional subtitle). - Replace
{{CONTENT}}with the rendered subjects — either the grid of cards or the one-pager layout. Seereferences/components.mdfor exact HTML patterns. - Replace
{{FOOTER}}with the footer text (or empty string). - Deliver the complete file as the response. No prose outside the file.
Hard Constraints
- No external URLs, CDN links, or web fonts in the output HTML.
- No
<script src>tags. All JavaScript must be inline. - All values must be pre-rendered — the page must be fully correct with JavaScript disabled.
- Do not generate Python, PowerShell, or any other scripts — output is always the HTML file.
- Do not render until the validation checklist passes.
- Do not use SharePoint Person column types in any accompanying list schema — use text columns only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

