agentleFS
peter-tu-zynkrpeter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder/skills/2-sales-consultant/consult-solution-planning/SKILL.md

consult-solution-planning

Skill21 starsChanged 49 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Turn an engagement's discovery outputs — consult-discovery summaries, consult-session-notes 痛點 ledgers, the client's stated goals — into a structured solution plan: persona, operator journey, pains ranked by 影響範圍 size × 強度 intensity × 頻率 frequency, selected opportunities, MVP scope, and success metrics — filed as a "[Plan]" Google Doc in the client's numbered [N] Drive folder and ending in an explicit handoff block for /consult-brd-writer. Operationalizes MrPM-Stanley's 產品企劃力 product-planning framework for consulting engagements. Trigger on /consult-solution-planning or when Peter says "幫客戶做需求規劃", "把痛點整理成方案規劃", "方案企劃", "規劃 MVP 範圍", "plan the client solution", "turn the pains into a plan", or "solution planning for this engagement". Distinct from product-planning (the generic mirror — raw product idea in, no engagement context, no filing; use it outside engagements), from consult-discovery / consult-session-notes (upstream producers of this skill's inputs), and from consult-brd-writer (downstream — formalizes THIS skill's plan into the client-grade BRD/PRD).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.